Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities (EJPAU) founded by all Polish Agriculture Universities presents original papers and review articles relevant to all aspects of agricultural sciences. It is target for persons working both in science and industry,regulatory agencies or teaching in agricultural sector. Covered by IFIS Publishing (Food Science and Technology Abstracts), ELSEVIER Science - Food Science and Technology Program, CAS USA (Chemical Abstracts), CABI Publishing UK and ALPSP (Association of Learned and Professional Society Publisher - full membership). Presented in the Master List of Thomson ISI.
2006
Volume 9
Issue 4
Topic:
Agronomy
ELECTRONIC
JOURNAL OF
POLISH
AGRICULTURAL
UNIVERSITIES
Sawinska Z. , Małecka I. , Blecharczyk A. 2006. IMPACT OF PREVIOUS CROPS AND TILLAGE SYSTEMS ON HEALTH STATUS OF WINTER WHEAT, EJPAU 9(4), #51.
Available Online: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume9/issue4/art-51.html

IMPACT OF PREVIOUS CROPS AND TILLAGE SYSTEMS ON HEALTH STATUS OF WINTER WHEAT

Zuzanna Sawinska, Irena Małecka, Andrzej Blecharczyk
Department of Plant and Soil Cultivation, Agricultural University of Poznan, Poland

 

ABSTRACT

The paper presents results of 3-year experiment (2001-2003) on the effect of different previous crops (winter wheat, pea, spring barley) and tillage systems (conventional tillage and direct drilling) on the incidence of fungal diseases of leaves, ear, stem base and roots of winter wheat. The highest infection percentage and index for the take-all and brown foot rot diseases were found when winter wheat was sown directly into the stubble. Significantly higher infection with the stem base and root diseases occurred after cereals (spring barley, winter wheat) than after pea. The conventional tillage increased the incidence of leaf and ear diseases of winter wheat as compared with direct drilling, except for the dry year. The occurrence and severity of wheat diseases depended on the previous crops and environmental conditions.

Key words: winter wheat, stem base and root diseases, leaf and ear diseases, previous crop, tillage system.

INTRODUCTION

Recent changes in agricultural practices towards conservation tillage cause us to wonder if farming is entering a new era of disease problems [3]. Tillage practices in combination wits the crop residue may physically, biologically and structurally alter the local field environment by affecting soil temperature and moisture, competition among microorganisms [18]. In no-till systems, the post-harvest residues left on the field surface become a direct source of fungal diseases, especially those which infect roots [2,3,5,12,17,18]. The investigations into the impact of the direct seeding on the occurrence of stem base diseases in winter wheat have given no clear-cut results. The effect of tillage systems on subsequent disease severity depends heavily on the previous crop. The crop selection affects the quantity and the quality of plant residue left on the surface or in the soil which can influence pathogen development, sporulation and survival rate through a release of fungicidal and fungistatic substances during the process of residue decomposition, or alternatively by providing substrates for specific pathogens to feed on. The relationship between the pathogen development and the kind of crop residue may be also modified by environmental conditions [3,5]. Alternative crops such as pea used to diversify cereal grain cropping systems play a valuable role to breaking the life cycle of fungal diseases [8,9,10,14,20,23].

The working hypothesis has assumed that in the direct seeding sysem the crop residue on the soil surface has a direct impact on the crop health status. However, the risk of diseases of direct-seeding winter wheat can be lower by eliminating monoculture and improving the diversity of crops in the rotation.

The aim of this paper was to determine the impact of previous crops and soil tillage systems on the occurrence of leaves, ears and stem base as well as root fungal diseases of winter wheat.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The studies carried out over 2001-2003 involved a static field experiment established in 1995 at the Brody Research Station of the Agricultural University in Poznań. The soil of the experimental fields is classified as Albic Luvisols developed on loamy sands overlying loamy material. ‘Sakwa’ winter wheat was grown after various previous crops (winter wheat, pea, spring barley) using conventional tillage (skimming + pre-sow ploughing) or direct drilling into the stubble with a disc coulter drill of the Great Plains Company. The fertilizer rates were applied at 26 kg P·ha-1, 81 kg K·ha-1 and 120 kg N·ha-1 doses. The herbicide program for tillage systems used pre-plant and post-emergence applications. Before planting 3 dm3·ha-1 of glyphosate herbicide was applied on all plots with direct drilling to control perennial weed and forecrop volunteers. For weed control during the growing season post-emergence Huzar 05 WG (jodosulphuron) was applied at the rate of 0.2 kg·ha-1. The seeds were dressed with Raxil Extra 060 FS fungicide (60 ml per 100 kg seed) containing thiuram and tebuconazol. For diseases control Alert 375 SC fungicide (flusilazole and carbendazime) at the rate of 1 dm3·ha-1 was applied on all plots at GS 31 growth stage.

The assessment of the winter wheat infection with the stem base and root diseases was carried out at four growth stages [25]: shooting (GS 31), beginning of heading (GS 51), beginning of milk stage (GS 73) and at full maturity (GS 92). Crop infection with the stem base and root diseases was evaluated visually at the lower parts of culms and roots with characteristic spots, discolorations and necroses. For each of the diseases there were calculated the percentage of plants with such symptoms, irrespective of their severity, as well as the infection index. The degree of infection with the take-all was assessed on the roots of plants with the 5-grade scale based on the CEB – Commission des Essais Biologiques de I’Association Nationale de Protection des Plantes [6], while the severity of the brown foot rot on the culm according to the 3-degree scale [24]. The infection of winter wheat plants with leaf and ear pathogens was assessed at the milk stage (GS 73) by determining the percentage of total leaf and ear area with disease symptoms using a graphic key for the determination of diseases developed by EPPO.

The results were subjected to variance analysis for randomized complete block design. The results were compared using Fisher-Snedecor’s test and verified with the Tukey test at P ≤ 0.05.

The weather conditions varied considerably over the experimental period. The mean air temperature during the spring vegetation period of winter wheat was above the multi-year mean, except for June 2001. Growing season precipitation from 2001 to 2003 (from sowing to harvest) was 447, 450 and 470 mm, respectively. Greater variations in precipitation occurred April through June and ranged from 148 mm in 2001 to 76 mm in 2003, whereas in 2002 amounted to 135 mm. To conclude, the weather conditions were more favorable to the development of wheat diseases in 2001 and 2002 than in 2003.

RESULTS

The dominant pathogens identified in the experiment were: Gaeumannomyces graminis (Sacc.) v. Arx et Olivier causing take-all and Fusarium spp. inflicting brown foot rot, Mycosphaerella graminicola (Fuck.) Schrot. – wheat leaf spot, Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Died.) Drechs.– leaf blotch and Blumeria graminis DC – powdery mildew. The stem base and root diseases severity increased from GS 31 to GS 92 (Table 1), which was seen from both the percentage and index of root infection in respective years. In 2001 and 2002 the percentage of plants infected with take-all at the successive evaluation dates was higher than in 2003 which coincided with the weather conditions unfavorable to the development. Before harvest, disease symptoms were recorded on 61.7% plants in the first year of the experiment, on 67.3% – in the second and on 36.7% – in the last year of the investigations. The extent of winter wheat infection with take-all expressed by the index of root infection also varied in the successive years of the experiment. In early spring the value of the infection index was higher in 2003 than in 2001 and 2002, although none of the values recorded exceeded mild infection levels. Towards the end of the vegetation period of winter wheat, this parameter increased and reached strong infection in 2001 (37.3) and in 2002 (31.6) and moderate infection in the last year of the studies (14.7).

Table 1. Infection of winter wheat with stem base and root diseases depending on the growth stage (mean for experimental factors)

Winter wheat growth stage

Gaeumannomyces graminis

Fusarium spp.

2001

2002

2003

2001

2002

2003

% of the stems infected

GS 31

16.2 a*

23.0 a

20.0 a

GS 51

23.3 b

35.4 b

26.5 b

34.4 a

33.8 a

20.4 a

GS 73

45.8 c

47.7 c

30.3 c

56.8 b

50.4 b

35.3 b

GS 92

61.7 d

67.3 d

36.7 d

73.7 c

82.0 c

41.9 c

infection index

GS 31

1.7 a

5.5 a

7.3 a

GS 51

4.1 b

7.8 b

8.3 a

66.6 a

44.7 a

44.7 a

GS 73

12.3 c

15.4 c

11.0 b

115.8 b

68.7 b

68.7 b

GS 92

37.3 d

36.1 d

14.7 c

155.4 c

176.5 c

176.5 c

a* – means followed by the same letters did not differ significantly

The degree of culm infection with brown foot rot was significantly higher in the first two years than in 2003, as expected from different weather conditions. During the period of heading (GS 51), the percentage of culms with symptoms of brown foot rot in 2001 and 2002 accounted for 34.4% and 33.8%, respectively, while in 2003 – for 20.4%. During the vegetation period, the percentage of infected culms increased and before harvest it reached the value of 82.0% in 2002, 73.7% in 2001 and 41.9% in the last year of the experiment. In all the experimental years, the calculated infection index for brown foot rot during the heading period (GS 51) was low and it did not exceed the range assumed for healthy plants, while at full maturity (GS 92), it increased to the level of medium infection in 2001 and 2002 and low infection in 2003.

Both the infection index and the percentage of plants with symptoms of take-all depended on the previous crop and tillage systems (Figs 1 and 2). Winter wheat grown after pea was less affected by take-all than after spring barley and winter wheat. When wheat was grown after pea, the percentage of plants with symptoms of take-all ranged from 8.8% in early spring to 28.3% before harvest (mean for the three years of the experiment). In comparison with the conventional tillage, at all evaluation dates, there was observed a significantly higher infection of winter wheat with Gaeumannomyces graminis where direct drilling was applied. At the shooting phase (GS 31), the share of plants with symptoms of take-all for the conventional tillage was 17.3%, whereas for direct drilling – 22.1%. Before harvest, the share of infected plants increased to 49.0 and 61.4% for conventional tillage and direct drilling, respectively.

Fig. 1. Effect of the previous crop and growth stage on the occurrence of take-all in winter wheat (mean for 2001-2003)

Fig. 2. Effect of tillage systems and growth stage on the occurrence of take-all in winter wheat (mean for 2001-2003)

The occurrence of brown foot rot in winter wheat also depended on the experimental factors (Figs 3 and 4). Regardless of the evaluation date, the lowest infection of winter wheat with brown foot rot was observed where wheat was grown after pea. On the other hand, conditions favorable to the disease development occurred when either winter wheat or spring barley constituted the previous crop. During the heading period (GS 51), the percentage of winter wheat plants infected with Fusariun spp. accounted for 27.6% after pea, 31.2% after winter wheat and 29.5% after spring barley. At full maturity, the percentage of culms with symptoms of the infection increased by 61.3, 65.3 and 71.0% after pea, winter wheat and spring barley, respectively. The infection index at the first evaluation date was low and ranged from 42.0 to 66.1, whereas at the end of the vegetation period, it increased to mild infection after pea and moderate – after winter wheat and spring barley. As compared with the conventional soil tillage, the percentage of culms with symptoms of brown foot rot and the infection index were significantly higher when direct drilling was performed.

Fig. 3. Effect of the previous crop and growth stage on the occurrence of brown foot rot in winter wheat (mean for 2001-2003)

Fig. 4. Effect of tillage systems and growth stage on the occurrence of brown foot rot in winter wheat (mean for 2001-2003)

Furthermore, the analysis of variance showed an interaction of the previous crop and tillage system on the index of root infection with Gaeumannomyces graminis (Table 2). The infection index for winter wheat after pea was significantly lower, at all the evaluation dates, as compared with winter wheat grown after winter wheat or spring barley in both systems of soil tillage. In conventional tillage, a similar infection index of take-all after spring barley and winter wheat was recorded, whereas for direct drilling this parameter was significantly higher for winter wheat grown in monoculture than after spring barley.

Table 2. Infection index of take-all depending on the previous crop and tillage systems
(mean for 2001-2003)

Winter wheat growth stage

Tillage systems

Previous crops

winter wheat

pea

spring barley

GS 31

Conventional

6.2 Ab*

0.9 Aa

6.1 Ab

Direct drilling

7.5 Bb

1.3 Aa

7.2 Bb

GS 51

Conventional

7.8 Ab

1.3 Aa

7.4 Ab

Direct drilling

11.3 Bc

2.1 Ba

10.5 Bb

GS 73

Conventional

14.3 Ab

2.0 Aa

15.6 Ab

Direct drilling

22.6 Bc

3.0 Ba

20.0 Bb

GS 92

Conventional

31.1 Ab

3.0 Aa

32.4 Ab

Direct drilling

50.5 Bc

5.2 Ba

45.1 Bb

A, b* – means within columns followed by the same uppercase letters and within a row followed by the same lowercase letters did not differ significantly

When analyzing the occurrence of the diseases found on the second leaf of winter wheat, it can be stated that leaf blotch and leaf spot occurred with greater severity than powdery mildew (Table 3). The infection with pathogens was greater in 2002 than in the other years. The effect of the previous crop on the disease incidence depended on the pathogen and varied in successive years. In the first year, the incidence of Blumeria graminis and Pyrenophora tritici-repentis on the second flag leaves did not depend on the previous crop. However, in the following years a higher infection with Blumeria graminis was observed on the leaves of winter wheat grown after pea than after winter wheat and spring barley, in contrast to the occurrence of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis which was lower after pea than after cereals. The effect of the previous crop on the infection of the second flag leaves with Mycosphaerella graminicola was observed only in 2002 when pea, as the previous crop, intensified the occurrence of this pathogen. The occurrence of Septoria nodorum was significantly affected by the previous crop; the same pathogen was also recorded in the second year of the experiment when the infection was higher after spring barley than after pea and winter wheat. The incidence of winter wheat leaf and ear diseases was higher under conventional tillage than after direct drilling, except for last year which was dry.

Table 3. Incidence of winter wheat leaf and ear diseases (the percentage of the total leaf area)

Treatments

Second flag leaf

Ear

Blumeria
graminis

Pyrenophora
tritici-repentis

Mycosphaerella graminicola

Septoria nodorum

2001

2002

2003

2001

2002

2003

2001

2002

2003

2001

2002

2003

Previous crop

Winter wheat

0.9 a*

1.0 a

0.6 a

2.3 a

9.3 b

7.0 c

2.3 a

13.7 a

2.1 a

0.9 a

0.7 a

0.7 a

Pea

1.0 a

1.5 b

0.9 b

2.6 a

7.3 a

2.9 a

2.4 a

16.9 b

1.9 a

1.1 a

0.6 a

0.6 a

Spring barley

1.0 a

1.1 a

0.5 a

2.9 a

9.6 b

5.2 b

2.1 a

12.5 a

2.1 a

1.0 a

1.2 b

0.7 a

Tillage systems

Conventional

1.3 B

1.4 B

0.8 A

3.0 B

9.5 B

4.9 A

2.8 B

18.2 B

2.0 A

1.1 B

1.1 B

0.7 A

Direct drilling

0.6 A

1.0 A

0.5 A

2.1 A

7.9 A

5.2 A

1.7 A

10.5 A

2.1 A

0.9 A

0.6 A

0.6 A

A, a* – means followed by the same letters did not differ significantly

DISCUSSION

A combination of monoculture and reduced tillage results in more post-harvest residue on the soil surface, which, in turn, may increase soil moisture and decrease soil temperature favorable to the occurrence of stem base and root diseases [2,3,5,18]. On the other hand, direct drilling plant residue left on the soil surface increases organic matter content in the topsoil and biological activity which can reduce pathogen populations in the soil [9]. For that reason the reports on the impact of soil tillage systems, especially direct drilling, on the occurrence of fungal diseases are quite inconsistent. Stem base and root diseases have been reported to be more intensive with reduced tillage [4,7,11,14,17], more intensive with conventional tillage [18,19] or similar whether the crop is grown with reduced or conventional tillage [15,16]. According to many researchers [1,4,7], the impact of tillage systems on fungal diseases is much smaller than the effect of environmental conditions (weather, soil), crop rotation, cultivars and seed dressing.

The results of the Brody investigation demonstrated that direct drilling increased the infection of winter wheat with stem base and root diseases as compared with the conventional soil tillage. Negative effects of reduced tillage on winter wheat can be alleviated by an appropriate crop rotation. Winter wheat, similarly as spring barley, is one of the most sensitive crops to stem base and root infection. Numerous authors [2,9,19] report on the effect of the previous crop on plant infection with pathogenic fungi being significantly higher than the effect of the soil tillage system.

A break crop in cereal rotation facilitates breaking the fungi life cycle in the soil [8,9,10,13,14,20,23]. Legumes in cereal grain rotations can reduce N mineral fertilization and decrease the incidence of stem base and root diseases [9,10,21,22]. The results of the present study coincide with the above reports. On average, the results of the three-year investigations showed a significantly higher infection of winter wheat with stem base and root diseases after cereal previous crops than after pea. The infection of winter wheat leaves and ears was low, except for leaf spot in 2002.

In some years a higher incidence of Blumeria graminis and Mycosphaerella graminicola was observed on the leaves of winter wheat grown after pea than after winter wheat and spring barley, in contrast to the occurrence of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis which was lower after pea than after cereal previous crops. Irrespective of tillage systems, for a majority of winter wheat leaf diseases, there was recorded a slightly higher infection for conventional than for reduced tillage, which could have been due to the specific development of this disease. Its severity is found higher in cereal rotations and in the fields exposed to reduced tillage which results in post-harvest residue on the soil surface [1,3,4].

CONCLUSIONS

  1. Direct drilling into the cereal stubble increased the infection of winter wheat with Gaeumannomyces graminis and Fusarium spp., as compared with conventional tillage.

  2. Pea included in the crop rotation, especially when exposed to direct drilling, minimized the impact of winter wheat on the occurrence of root diseases.

  3. The conventional tillage increased the incidence of Blumeria graminis, Mycosphaerella graminicola and Pyrenophora tritici-repentis on the winter wheat leaves and Septoria nodorum on the ears, as compared with direct drilling, except for the dry year.

  4. In most years the incidence of Blumeria graminis and Mycosphaerella graminicola was highest when winter wheat was sown after pea, while that of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis – after cereals.


REFERENCES

  1. Anderson K., Bailey K., Gossen B., Lafond G., 1999. Impact of crop management system on disease severity of wheat and field pea 1995-1997. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 21, 193-194.

  2. Arvidsson J., 1998. Effect of cultivation depth in reduced tillage on soil physical properties, crop yield and plant pathogens. Eur. J. Agron. 9, 79-85.

  3. Bailey K., 1996. Diseases under conservation tillage systems. Can. J. Plant Sci. 76, 635-639.

  4. Bailey K., Duczek L., 1996. Managing cereal diseases under reduced tillage. Can. J. Plant Sci. 18, 159-167.

  5. Bailey K., Lazarovits G., 2003. Suppressing soil-borne diseases with residue management and organic amendments. Soil Till. Res. 72, 169-180.

  6. Beale R., Phillion D., Headrick J., O’Reilly P., Cox J., 1998. MON65500: A unique fungicide for the control of take-all in wheat. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. – Pest & Diseases 2, 343-350.

  7. Bockus W., Shroyer J., 1998. The impact of reduced tillage on soilborne plant pathogens. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 36, 485-500.

  8. Colbach N., Huet P., 1995. Modelling the frequency and severity of root and foot diseases in winter wheat monocultures. Eur. J. Agron. 4, 217-227.

  9. Krupinsky J., Bailey K., McMullen M., Gossen B., Turkington K., 2002. Managing plant disease risk in diversified cropping systems. Agron. J. 94, 198-209.

  10. Lemańczyk G., 2002. Wpływ zróżnicowanych przedplonów na zdrowotnosc podstawy zdzbła pszenicy ozimej uprawianej na glebie dobrego kompleksu pszennego [Impact of different forecrops on health status of stem base of winter wheat cultivated on the soil of good wheat complex]. Acta Sci. Pol., Agricultura 1(1), 111-119 [in Polish].

  11. Małecka I., Blecharczyk A., Sawińska Z., 2001. Wpływ systemów uprawy roli na występowanie chorób podstawy zdzbła w pszenżycie ozimym i jęczmieniu jarym [Influence of tillage systems on diseases occurrence in winter triticale and spring barley]. Progress in Plant Protection 41(2), 920-923 [in Polish].

  12. Orzech K., Nowicki J., Marks M., 2003. Znaczenie uprawy roli w kształtowaniu środowiska [Role of soil tillage in environment management]. Post. Nauk. Roln. 1, 131-144 [in Polish].

  13. Parylak D., Kordas L., 2001. Wpływ czynników agrotechnicznych na porażenie pszenicy ozimej przez zgorzel podstawy źdźbła (Gaeumannomyces graminis) [Effect of agronomic factors on take- all (Gaeumannomyces graminis) infection of winter wheat]. Progress in Plant Protection 41(2), 762-765 [in Polish].

  14. Parylak D., 2004. Possibilities of root and stem base diseases limitation in continuous wheat under conventional tillage and no-tillage system. J. Plant Protect. Res. 44(2), 141-146.

  15. Pląskowska E., Matkowski K., Moszczyńska E., Kordas L., 2002. Zdrowotność podstawy źdźbła pszenicy jarej w uprawie tradycyjnej i siewie bezpośrednim przy dwóch poziomach nawożenia azotem [Health status of spring wheat culm base exposed to traditional tillage and direct sowing for two levels of nitrogen fertilization]. Acta Sci. Pol., Agricultura 1(1), 131-138 [in Polish].

  16. Ramsey N., Cook R., Halsey M., 2000. Prevalence of wheat take-all in the Pacific Northwest. Phytopathology 90, S63.

  17. Roget D., Neate S., Rovira A., 1996. Effect of sowing point design and tillage practice on the incidence of Rhizoctonia root rot, take-all and cereal cyst nematode in wheat and barley. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 36, 683-693.

  18. Rothrock C., 1992. Tillage systems and plant disease. Soil Sci. 154, 308-315.

  19. Różalski K., Blecharczyk A., Skrzypczak G., Piechota T., 1998. Choroby podsuszkowe pszenicy ozimej uprawianej po różnych przedplonach w systemie siewu bezpośredniego [Stem base disease incidence on direct seeded winter wheat after different previous crops]. Progress in Plant Protection 38(2), 553-557 [in Polish].

  20. Sieling K., Hanus H., 1992. Yield of winter wheat influenced by the interactions between crop management measures and take-all. Eur. J. Agron. 1(3), 201-206.

  21. Stevenson F., Van Kessel C. 1996. The nitrogen and non-nitrogen rotation benefits of pea to succeeding crops. Can. J. Plant Sci. 76, 735-745.

  22. Turkington T., Clayton G. 2000. Crop rotation and plant disease management. Proc. 12th Direct Seeding Conference, Regina UK, 1-7.

  23. Weber Z., 2002. Wpływ przedplonu i chemicznego zaprawiania ziarna na występowanie zgorzeli podstawy źdźbła pszenicy ozimej (Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici) [Influence of forecrop and chemical seed treatment on the occurrence of take-all (Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici) on winter wheat. Acta Agrobot. 55(1), 359-365 [in Polish].

  24. Windels C., Wiersma J., 1992. Incidence of Biopolaris and Fusarium on subcrown internodes of spring barley and wheat grown in continuous conservation tillage. Phytopathology 882, 699- 705.

  25. Zadoks J, Chang T, Konzak C. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14, 415-421.

 

Accepted for print: 21.12.2006


Zuzanna Sawinska
Department of Plant and Soil Cultivation,
Agricultural University of Poznan, Poland
Mazowiecka 45/46, 60-231 Poznan, Poland
email: zuza@au.poznan.pl

Irena Małecka
Department of Plant and Soil Cultivation,
Agricultural University of Poznan, Poland
Mazowiecka 45/46, 60-231 Poznan, Poland
email: malecka@au.poznan.pl

Andrzej Blecharczyk
Department of Plant and Soil Cultivation,
Agricultural University of Poznan, Poland
Mazowiecka 45/46, 60-231 Poznan, Poland
email: blechar@au.poznan.pl

Responses to this article, comments are invited and should be submitted within three months of the publication of the article. If accepted for publication, they will be published in the chapter headed 'Discussions' and hyperlinked to the article.