Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities (EJPAU) founded by all Polish Agriculture Universities presents original papers and review articles relevant to all aspects of agricultural sciences. It is target for persons working both in science and industry,regulatory agencies or teaching in agricultural sector. Covered by IFIS Publishing (Food Science and Technology Abstracts), ELSEVIER Science - Food Science and Technology Program, CAS USA (Chemical Abstracts), CABI Publishing UK and ALPSP (Association of Learned and Professional Society Publisher - full membership). Presented in the Master List of Thomson ISI.
2006
Volume 9
Issue 1
Topic:
Biology
ELECTRONIC
JOURNAL OF
POLISH
AGRICULTURAL
UNIVERSITIES
Nowakowska K. , Halarewicz A. 2006. PRUNUS SEROTINA (EHRH) – NEW FOOD RESOURCE FOR POLYPHAGOUS LEPIDOPTERA, EJPAU 9(1), #13.
Available Online: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume9/issue1/art-13.html

PRUNUS SEROTINA (EHRH) – NEW FOOD RESOURCE FOR POLYPHAGOUS LEPIDOPTERA

Kalina M. Nowakowska1, Aleksandra Halarewicz2
1 Forestry Management of Lubin, Poland
2 Department of Botany and Plant Ecology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Poland

 

ABSTRACT

Observations carried out in south-western Poland revealed that Prunus serotina (Ehrh), invasive plant species new to Poland, became a suitable food source for 10 polyphagous lepidopteran species, including one protected species: scarce swallowtail, Iphiclides podalirius L.

Key words: Lepidoptera, scarce swallowtail, Iphiclides podalirius, Prunus serotina, Poland.

INTRODUCTION

Choosing a plant as a food source by contemporary insect populations should be viewed from an evolutionary perspective, and any existing interactions between plants and herbivore insects – considered as dynamic, constantly evolving relations [6]. Such relations can be found either for partners of plant-herbivore systems that are associated for a long time, or for the situations when a particular insect or a plant species appear in a habitat that is entirely new for them. Most often new plant species become adopted as a food resource primarily by non-specialized insect herbivores. This paper shows species range of lepidopterans native to Poland, which accepted Prunus serotina (Ehrh.) (Rosaceae), the alien species from North America [10] as a host plant for their larvae. Interestingly, one of the species feeding on the neophyte plant is scarce swallowtail, Iphiclides podalirius (L.) (Papilionidae) [5,11,8]. In many countries, including Poland, I. podalirius is a protected species [4]. It shows patchy distribution in Poland, and is most often found on sun-exposed mountain slopes of limestone bedrock. North range of that species is at 51°N [3]. Its larvae usually feed on hawthorn (Crataegus sp.), sometimes on mountain-ash (Sorbus aucuparia (L.)), on blackthorn (Prunus spinosa (L.)) [7], as well as on other native species of the genus Prunus [12,5].

STUDY AREA AND METHODS

The main observations were carried out since the 3rd decade of April till the 2nd decade of August 2003 in the vicinity of Lubin, SW Poland (square BE of ATPOL net). Two plants of Prunus serotina were observed, growing within two different ecological contexts:

1. as a single-standing plant within an open area (Plantaginetea majoris association), at a distance of 800m from the forest edge (site 1, further called “open”),

2. as a component of forest community, where the undergrowth layer covered more than 50% of the forest floor and was dominated by P. serotina (Leucobryo-Pinetum association)(site 2, further called “forest”).

In order to determine species composition of Lepidoptera on P. serotina at the two sites, the plants growing there were thoroughly inspected at each observation date, up to the height of 2m above ground level and within the entire depth of their crowns at that height.

Separately, in the years of 2000, 2001 and 2003, several occasional observations were made on the infestation of P. serotina by Iphiclides podalirius (L.)(Papilionidae). These observations were conducted within Przemkowski Landscape Reserve and they concerned plants of black cherry growing as bushes rather than trees, it is not higher than 0.5m.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Density and species composition of Lepidoptera infesting black cherry varied across the observed sites (Tab. 1). On the plant at the open site 31 caterpillars were found over the observation period, and they were larvae of 3 species. The site was dominated by Lycia hirtaria (Cl.) (Geometridae) (Tab. 1, Fig. 1), which develops one generation a year and feeds on many decideous plant species. Other plants in the vicinity of that black cherry tree were silver birch (Betula pendula (Roth)), common pear (Pyrus communis (L,)) and common oak (Quercus robur (L)). L. hirtaria occured on Prunus serotina at its greatest density at the beginning of May. It was feeding on black cherry till the end of August and its larvae were found on the plant on 12 out of 13 observation dates. Larvae of two other species, Acronicta rumicis (L.) (Noctuidae), and Malacosoma neustria (L.) (Lasiocampidae), were recorded at that site as single specimens.

Table 1. Species composition of Lepidoptera on Prunus serotina in two investigated habitats in 2003

Plantaginetea majoris association – “open” side

Species

26 IV

1
V

10 V

16 V

23 V

1 VI

16 V

23 V

4 VI

16 VI

26 VI

8 VII

17 VII

Lycia hirtaria (Cl).

 

6

4

3

2

1

2

1

1

2

4

1

1

Acronictae rumicis (L.)

           

2

           

Malacosoma neustria (L.)

         

1

             

Number of species

0

1

1

1

1

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

Number of specimens

0

6

4

3

2

2

4

1

1

2

4

1

1

Leucobryo-Pinetum association – “forest

Species

26 IV

1 V

10 V

16 V

23 V

1 VI

16 V

23 V

4 VI

16 VI

26 VI

8 VII

17 VII

Euproctis similis (Fuessly)

1

3

15

3

4

1

 

1

2

1

3

 

2

Hemithea aestivaria (Hbn.)

 

2

1

1

                 

Orgyia antiqua (L.)

     

2

1

6

1

1

2

5

1

 

1

Erannis defoliaria (Cl.)

 

3

2

4

1

 

1

 

1

       

Diloba caerulocephala (L.)

 

5

7

3

5

2

 

3

         

Lomographa bimaculata (F.)

         

1

 

1

2

1

     

Number of species

1

4

4

5

4

4

2

4

4

3

2

0

2

Number of specimens

1

13

25

13

11

10

2

6

7

7

4

0

3

At the forest site Lepidoptera were clearly more abundant; as 102 caterpillars were observed over the same period of time. Six species were recorded feeding there on P. serotina, and none of them was one of the 3 species found at the site 1 (open) (Table 1). The dominating species were Euproctis similis (Fuessly) (Fig. 2), Diloba caerulocephala (L.) (Noctuidae) (Figs 5, 6), and Orgyia antiqua (L.) (Lymantriidae) (Figs 3, 4). E. similis was recorded at greatest numbers and most often of all the 6 observed species. Erannis defoliaria (Cl.)(Geometridae) also occured for most of the observation period, but it was less abundant. Host plants of the larvae of these 4 Lepidoptera species are many tree and shrub species, in particular oak (Quercus sp.), willow (Salix sp.), poplar (Populus sp.) and linden ( Tilia sp.), as well as hazel (Corylus avellana L.), hawthorn (Crataegus sp.) and fruit trees [7]. Caterpillars of Hemithea aestivaria (Hbn.) and Lomographa bimaculata (F.) (Geometridae) were recorded sporadically.

Fig. 1. Lycia hirtaria (Cl.) – larva

Fig. 2. Euproctis similis (Fuessly) – imago

Fig. 3. Orgyia antiqua (L.) – larva

Fig. 4. Orgyia antiqua (L.) – imago

Fig. 5. Diloba caerulocephala (L.) – larva

Fig. 6. Diloba caerulocephala (L.) – imago

The observed variation in species diversity of Lepidoptera between the two monitored plants of P. serotina may result from their different location and habitat size. Altough, when adopting here the theory of island biogeography [9] both sites can be seen as “islands” in their surrounding habitat, the black cherry tree growing alone represents smaller habitat, than a dense canopy formed by many Prunus plants, as the one at the forest site. Habitat size can alter biodiversity in biocenoses [1]. Consequently, the “immigration rate” for the single, isolated tree is lower and it supports fewer immigrating species than single trees growing as parts to a larger system.

Observations of Prunus serotina within Przemkowski Landscape Reserve in 2000, 2001 and 2003 confirmed feeding of Iphiclides podalirius (L.) caterpillars on the plant, which is there more abundant than any other potential food resource. Still, it deserves attention that there were some convenient habitat conditions, other than just P. serotina, that allowed colonization and developing of the new trophic relation. These are namely the presence of sun-exposed turfs in which I. podalirius larvae can pupate, and the supply of nectar for imagines by elder Sambucus nigra (L.), common liliac Syringa vulgaris (L.) and blackthorn (Prunus spinosa (L.)). Although in these circumstances the neophyte permitted survival of the rare buterfly, the plant`s role in recovering of the I. podalirius population should not be overestimated – this herbivore has much broader scope of potential host plants. On the other hand, most likely reason for the poor condition of its population is the technology and the extent of turf management in the surroundings of host plants, as well as catching by amateur entomologists [2].

REFERENCES

  1. Begon M., Mortimer M., Thompson J. 1996. Population ecology, a unified study of animals and plants. 3rd edition in Polish by: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Warszawa, 1999, 362 pp.

  2. Bielewicz M. 1967. Przyczyny zaniku w Polsce pazia żeglarza [Reasons for the extinction of Iphiclides podalirius, in Poland], in: “Chrońmy przyrodę ojczystą”, 23, 2: 21-29 [in Polish].

  3. Buszko J. 1997. Atlas rozmieszczenia motyli dziennych w Polsce 1986-1995 [Atlas of the distribution of butterflies (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) in Poland ]. Oficyna Wydawnicza TURPRESS. Toruń, 170 pp. [in Polish].

  4. Głowaciński Z. 2002. Czerwona lista zwierząt ginacych i zagrożonych w Polsce. [Red list of threatened and critically endangered animal species in Poland], by: Oficyna Wydawnicza TEXT, Kraków, 155 pp. [in Polish].

  5. Głowacki J. 1972. Przyczyny zanikania pazia żeglarza Iphiclides podalirius w Polsce [Reasons for the extinction of Iphiclides podalirius, in Poland], in: “Chrońmy przyrodę ojczystą”, 28, 3: 53-56 [in Polish].

  6. Harborne J. B. 1993. Introduction to ecological biochemistry. 1st edition in Polish by: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Warszawa, 1997, 351 pp.

  7. Heintze J. 1978. Motyle Polski – atlas; cz. I [Lepidoptera of Poland, Atlas, Part 1], by: Wydawnictwo Szkolne i Pedagogiczne. Warszawa, 303 pp. [in Polish].

  8. Landek L., Wiesner T., Lauchhammer, Henzel K.-U. 2000. Eine neue Raupennahrungspflanze des Segelfalter (Papilionidae, Lepidoptera) – die Spatbluhende Traubenkirsche (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) [A new host plant species for scarce swallowtail (Papilionidae, Lepidoptera) – black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.)]. Ent. Nachr. Ber. 44: 183-187 [in German].

  9. Mac Arthur R. H., Wilson E. O. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press. Princeton: 203 pp.

  10. Starfinger U. 1997. Introduction and naturalization of Prunus serotina in Central Europe. In: “Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe”(ed. by J.H. Brock, M. Wade, P. Pysek, D. Green). Backhuys Publishers. Leiden. 161-171.

  11. Szymkiewicz E., Szymkiewicz M. 1992. Paz żeglarz Iphiclides podalirius ponownie elementem fauny Pojezierza Mazurskiego [Iphiclides podalirius, comes back as a taxon present in the fauna of Pojezierze Mazurskie], in: “Chrońmy przyrodę ojczysta”, XLVIII, 6: 78-80 [in Polish].

  12. Tolman T., Lewington R. 1998. Die Tagfalter Europas und Nordwestafrikas [The butterflies (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) of Europe and northwest Africa.]. Kosmos. Stuttgart. 319 pp. [in German].


Kalina M. Nowakowska
Forestry Management of Lubin, Poland
Gwarkow 53/9, 59-335 Lubin 7, Poland
email: ludekpies@interia.pl

Aleksandra Halarewicz
Department of Botany and Plant Ecology,
Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Poland
Pl. Grunwaldzki 24a, 50-363 Wrocław, Poland
email: aleksandra.halarewicz@up.wroc.pl

Responses to this article, comments are invited and should be submitted within three months of the publication of the article. If accepted for publication, they will be published in the chapter headed 'Discussions' and hyperlinked to the article.