Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities (EJPAU) founded by all Polish Agriculture Universities presents original papers and review articles relevant to all aspects of agricultural sciences. It is target for persons working both in science and industry,regulatory agencies or teaching in agricultural sector. Covered by IFIS Publishing (Food Science and Technology Abstracts), ELSEVIER Science - Food Science and Technology Program, CAS USA (Chemical Abstracts), CABI Publishing UK and ALPSP (Association of Learned and Professional Society Publisher - full membership). Presented in the Master List of Thomson ISI.
2016
Volume 19
Issue 1
Topic:
Agronomy
ELECTRONIC
JOURNAL OF
POLISH
AGRICULTURAL
UNIVERSITIES
Zarzyńska K. , Goliszewski W. , Boguszewska-Mańkowska D. 2016. USABLE AND NON-USABLE BIOMASS OF POTATOES GROWN UNDER TWO CROP PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND TWO DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, EJPAU 19(1), #08.
Available Online: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume19/issue1/art-08.html

USABLE AND NON-USABLE BIOMASS OF POTATOES GROWN UNDER TWO CROP PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND TWO DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

Krystyna Zarzyńska, Wojciech Goliszewski, Dominika Boguszewska-Mańkowska
Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute – NRI, Potato Agronomy Department, Jadwisin, Poland

 

ABSTRACT

A field study was conducted in years 2011–2013 in two different places in Poland. Four potato cultivars (Flaming – very early, Viviana – very early, Vineta – early, Gustaw – mid early) were grown under organic and integrated systems. During the full development stage, i.e. end of June (for the early varieties) and 2 weeks later (for later ones) total above-ground biomass was assessed. The tuber yield and share of tuber in total plant biomass was calculated during the harvest. It was stated that the highest influence on assimilates distribution to usable and non-usable part of plant had the site of growing and the cultivar. The farming system and the weather conditions during growing season did not significantly influence the share of tuber in total plant biomass. There was significant interaction between the farming system and the site of growing regard to total biomass and tuber yield. Under organic system on lighter soil the total biomass and the yield was slightly lower than on heavier soil, but under integrated system the relation was diverse. Relatively small diversity of cultivars regarding the share of tubers in the total biomass was noticed.

Key words: above-ground biomass, integrated system, organic system, potato, share of tubers.

INTRODUCTION

In agriculture, particularly important is the part of cultivated plants biomass called agricultural crop, which is used for feeding people and animals. In potato plant only one part of biomass is usable-tubers, the rest is non-usable.

Management of plant growth to maximize yield and economic return while minimizing water, fertilizer, pesticides, and other inputs is a primary goal in commercial crop production. Attention must be given to the partitioning of assimilates between canopy and tubers, as too much to one or the other can lead to an imbalance and a reduction in tuber yield. Maximizing the interception of solar radiation by the potato canopy during key growth stages, and in turn the efficiency of conversion of intercepted light to photosynthesic assimilates, is essential for maximizing yield and or agronomic return [4–8] provided the plant is healthy and has unlimited access to nutrients, water and moderate temperature.

The ideal canopy size and duration varies by cultivar and season length.

Parameter which characterizes the participation of agricultural crop in the total plant biomass is harvest index (share of tubers in total plant biomass) [2, 9, 13, 16].

This indicator depends on many factors, the main ones are: varietal characteristics, growing season conditions such as: photoperiod, air temperature, water, nitrogen fertilization [1, 2, 10, 12, 13, 16]. The potato crop is characterized by one of the highest harvest index.. Modern varieties of potatoes grown in temperate climates in favorable agrometeorological conditions can achieve harvest index in the range from 0.70 to 0.85 [2, 5, 9]. Some research reports the value of the coefficient of 0.90 [1, 11] which means that 90% of the biomass is accumulated in the tubers. For comparison, this ratio for grains ranges from 0.3 to 0.6 [9].

The share of usable biomass in total plant biomass can depend also on crop production system.

It is connected mainly with fertilization and plant protection.

Not many research is available to get some information about distribution of assimilates to usable and non–usable parts of potato plants depending on farming system. The aim of the study was to asses of four potato varieties grown in the two crop production systems i.e. organic and integrated in different climate and soil conditions with regards to distribution of assimilates to different part of plant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Material for the research comes from field experiments conducted in years 2011–2013 on two type of soils: experimental station of the Institute of Soil Science – Osiny (south-eastern Poland) on the heavier soil ( plow soil with elements of black degradated soil), and the Institute of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization – Jadwisin (central Poland) on lighter soil: pseudopodsolic formed from light loamy sands.

In both places potatoes were grown in 2 crop production systems: organic and integrated. In each system different rotations and various production technologies were used.

Crop rotation in organic system, heavier soil – Osiny: potato → barley with undersown red clover → red clover with grasses → red clover with grasses + catch crop winter wheat. Rotation in the integrated system – Osiny: potato → barley → field bean for seed → wheat + catch crop.

In the organic system, lighter soil, Jadwisin: potatoes → field peas → oat → rye with under sown serradella → phacelia + white mustard as catch crops.

In the integrated system, lighter soil, Jadwisin: potatoes → spring wheat → winter wheat → lupines.

The two systems also differed in fertilization, weed control and insect control practices (Tab. 1).

Table 1. Agronomic inputs in organic and integrated systems
Crop production practice
Organic system
Jadwisin
Integrated system
Jadwisin
Organic system
Osiny
Integrated system
Osiny
Fertilization
Cow composted manure applied in spring:
28 t∙ha-1 + mustard as a catch crop
4–5 t plowed rye straw + 1 kg mineral nitrogen per 100 kg straw + mustard as a catch crop
N: 100 kg∙ha-1
P: 53 kg∙ha-1
K: 150 kg∙ha-1
Compost – 30 kg∙ha-1 + catch crop
Manure – 25 t∙ha-1
N: 75 kg∙ha-1
P: 60 kg∙ha-1
K:105 kg∙ha-1
Weed control
Only mechanical tillage
Mechanical tillage + herbicides:
2011: Afalon 1.9 l∙ha-1 + Titus + Trend (60 g∙ha + 0.5 l∙ha-1)
2012: Afalon 1.9 l∙ha-1 Titus + Trend (60 g∙ha-1 + 0.5 l∙ha-1)
2013: Linurex – 1.8 l∙ha-1 Titus + Trend (60 g∙ha-1 + 0.5 l∙ha-1)
Only mechanical tillage
Mechanical tillage + herbicides:
2011: Afalon 2 l∙ha-1, Econom – 2 kg∙ha-1
2012: Afalon 2 l∙ha-1, Econom – 2 kg∙ha-1
2013: Afalon 2 l∙ha-1, Ekonom: 2 kg∙ha-1
Colorado potato beetle control
Biological insecticide (Bacillus thuringiensis) – Novodor 
2012, 2013: 2 times per season: 4 l∙ha-1
Chemical insecticides:
2011: Actara 2 times per season – 60 g∙ha-1
2012: Actara – 60 g∙ha-1
2013: Actara 2 times per season – 60 g∙ha-1 
Apacz – 40 g∙ha-1
Biological insecticide (Bacillus thuringensis)
2–3 times per season: 4 l∙ha-1
Chemical insecticides:
2011: Infinito 1.5 l∙ha-1, Actara – 60 g∙ha-1
2012: Decis Mega 0.1 l∙ha-1, Mospilan 0.2 l∙ha-1, Infinito 1.5 l∙ha-1
Late blight control
Copper fungicides
2012: Miedzian 50 – 2 times per season – 3 l∙ha-1
2013: Miedzian 50 – 3 l∙ha-1
Chemical fungicides:
2011: Ridomil – 2 l∙ha-1, Revus – 0.6 l∙ha-1, Ranman – 0.2 l∙ha-1, Altima – 0.4 l∙ha-1
2012: Ridomil – 2 l∙ha-1, Revus – 0.6 l∙ha-1, Ranman – 0.2 l∙ha-1, Altima – 0.4 l∙ha-1, Ranman – 0.2 l∙ha-1
2013: Revus – 0.6 l∙ha-1
Copper fungicides
2012: Miedzian 50 – 2 times per season – 3 l∙ha-1
2013: Miedzian 50 – 3 l∙ha-1
Chemical fungicides
2011: Ranman 0.2 l∙ha-1
Revus – 0.6 l∙ha-1
Altima – 0.4 l∙ha-1
2012: Ridomil 2 l∙ha-1
Revus – 0.6 l∙ha-1
Ranman – 0.2 l∙ha-1
Altima – 0.4 l∙ha-1
Ranman – 0.2 l∙ha-1
2013: Ranman – 0.2 l∙ha-1

Four potato Polish table cultivars were chosen for this experiment based on maturity class and resistance to late blight. All cultivars were planted at the same time i.e. about 20th of April. Plot size was 84 m2 for each cultivar in three replications. Plants were grown with spacing 75 × 33.3 cm. Characteristics of tested cultivars is given in Table 2.

Table 2. Characteristics of four potato cultivars evaluated in organic and integrated production systems during the years 2011–2013
Cultivar
Maturity
Resistance to Phytophthora infestans*
Flaming
very early
2
Viviana
very early
2
Vineta
early
2
Gustaw
mid late
5

At the full development stage, i.e. end of June (for the early varieties) and 2 weeks later (for later ones) total above ground biomass was assessed. Plants were removed, main stems were calculated, all biomass were divided on stems and leaves and weighted. The measurements were conducted on four plants from each of the three replicates.

At harvest time, 5th of September for early cultivars and 2 weeks later for later one tuber yield were assessed. Tuber yield was analyzed from all plots in 3 replications. Data were analyzed using the ANOVA program, with means separated by Student's t-test.

Weather conditions during growing season for both places are given in Table 3.

Table 3. Total monthly rainfall (P) and mean monthly temperatures (T) during the vegetative growth period in the years 2011–2013 for Jadwisin and Osiny
Year
Place
April
May
June
July
August
September
P [mm]
T [ºC]
P [mm]
T [ºC]
P [mm]
T [ºC]
P [mm]
T [ºC]
P [mm]
T [ºC]
P [mm]
T [ºC]
2011
Jadwisin
21.8
9.7
33.1
13.2
44.8
17.5
278.1
17.0
57.1
17.5
18.5
13.7
Osiny
32.5
10.2
60.5
14.8
54.4
19.4
250.1
18.5
36.2
18.7
3.1
14.4
2012
Jadwisin
54.3
7.9
52.4
13.9
96.6
15.6
92.2
18.8
87.2
17.4
26.9
12.8
Osiny
49.3
8.4
35.3
15.6
68.9
17.7
114.3
21.4
93.9
19.0
19.4
15.0
2013
Jadwisin
51.1
6.3
130.0
15.7
105.4
17.2
17.1
18.7
97.7
18.2
94.0
10.9
Osiny
54.4
7.2
85.4
15.6
37.4
19.7
30.3
19.8
7.1
19.8
47.6
12.1

RESULTS

Statistical analysis
There were significant differences in most of the examined parameters characterizing the usable and non-usable biomass of potatoes associated with production system, place, cultivar and year (Tab. 4). The only exceptions were for yield and total biomass, which were not affected by place, and share of tuber yield in total biomass, which was not affected by production system and year. There were a few significant interactions between tested factors. For tuber yield and total biomass there was significant interaction between farming system and place of growing.

Table 4. Significance of differences in parameter means
Tested parameter
Cultivar
Farming system
Site
Year
Above-ground mass of 1 plant
*
**
**
**
Yield of 1 plant
**
**
**
Total biomass of 1 plant
*
**
**
Share of tubers i n total biomass
*
**
** = significant at  α ≤ 0.05 
* = significant at  α ≤ 0.01 
–  = non significant

Significant interactions:
Yield: system × site

Influence of crop production system on usable and non-usable biomass of potatoes
Production system significantly differentiated the values for all studied parameters. Higher values were obtained for the integrated system. The biggest difference concerned the tuber yield per one plant, the smallest-the share of tubers in the total biomass (Tab. 5).

Table 5. Value of tested parameters depending on farming system (mean for 2 places and 3 years)
Farming system
Above-ground biomass [g]
Tuber yield per plant [g]
Total biomass [g]
Share of tubers in total biomass [%]
Organic
305a
554a
859a
65.5a
Integrated
427b
972b
1399b
70.2b
Difference in relation to integrated system [%]
+28.6
+43.0
+38.6
+6.7
a, b – statistically different groups

Influence of growing site on usable and non-usable biomass of potatoes
The site of growing (environmental conditions) significantly differed only such parameter as above-ground biomass, and share of tubers in total biomass. There was no significant difference in tuber yield and total biomass. The above-ground biomass was significantly greater in Osiny (heavier soil) than in Jadwisin (lighter soil). There was a big difference in distribution of assimilates depending on growing site i.e. better results were obtained in Jadwisin (Tab. 6).

Table 6. Value of tested parameters depending on place of growing (mean for 2 systems and 3 years)
Place of growing
Above-ground biomass [g]
Tuber yield per plant [g]
Total biomass [g]
Share of tubers in total biomass [%]
Jadwisin
312a
789a
1101a
71.7b
Osiny
419b
735a
1154a
63.7a
Differences  in relation to Osiny [%]
+25.5
-6.8
+4.6
-11.2

Influence of cultivar on usable and non-usable biomass of potatoes
Cultivars significantly differed depends on all tested parameters. The biggest difference for above-ground biomass and total biomass concerned early cultivar Viviana and mid late cultivar Gustaw, for tuber yield – very early cultivar Viviana and early cultivar Vineta. The best distribution of assimilates had cultivar Vineta, the worse – cultivar Gustaw (Tab. 7).

Table 7. Value of tested parameters depending on cultivar (mean for 2 systems and 3 years)
Cultivar
Above-ground biomass
[g]
Tuber yield per plant
[g]
Total biomass
[g]
Share of tubers in total biomass
[%]
Flaming
389ab
746ab
1135ab
66.8ab
Gustaw
425b
795ab
1220b
65.7a
Vineta
335ab
827b
1162ab
71.0b
Viviana
315a
681a
996a
67.8ab

Influence of years on usable and non-usable biomass of potatoes
The weather conditions in the years of investigations had significant influence on all tested parameters apart from share of tubers in total biomass. The best parameters were achieved in favorable for growing potatoes 2012 and the worse in 2013 – when weather conditions were unfavorable (Tab. 8). The above-ground biomass in 2013 was of 47.8% lower than in 2012, tuber yield of 37.5% and total biomass of 40.5%. The distribution of assimilates to above-ground part of plant and to tubers was the same in all years.

Table 8. Value of tested parameters depending on years (mean for 2 systems and 4 cultivars)
Year
Above- ground biomass
[g]
Differences in relation to 2012
[%]
Tuber yieldper plant
[g]
Differences in relation to 2012
[%]
Total biomass
[g]
Differences in relation to 2012
[%]
Share of tubers  in total biomass
[%]
Differences in relation to 2012
[%]
2011
400b
-12.9
808b
-11.3
1208b
-11.0
66.3a
-1.5
2012
459b
911c
1357c
67.3a
2013
239a
-47.9
569a
-37.5
808a
-40.5
69.8a
+3.6

Interactions between tested parameters
There was significant interaction between farming system and site of growing in regard to tuber yield and total biomass. Under organic system on lighter soil the yield was slightly lower than on heavier soil but under integrated system the relation was diverse. There were similar relationships to total biomass. Under organic system the total biomass was higher in Osiny (heavier soil) but under integrated system, higher biomass was noticed in Jadwisin (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Total biomass and tuber yield depending on crop production system and place of growing (mean for 3 years)

DISCUSSION

An indicator that best describes the share of usable yield in total biomass is harvest index .Harvest index of potato plants or share of tuber yield in total biomass in literature is most often related to conventional plantations, with different levels of fertilization [1, 6, 13, 14, 17]. The value of this index is rather higher than in our study, where the potatoes were grown in the organic and integrated systems. Growing potatoes in these systems generally involves a lower yield of tubers. According to the literature data yielding of organic plantation is about 20–50% lower compared to the conventional one [11, 18, 19] also a weight of aboveground part of plant is less [18, 20]. Literature states that the harvest index decreases with increasing of nitrogen doses fertilization [1, 13, 17]. In our study, there was no such relationship. Also Mazurczyk and others 2009 did not confirm such it. In the present work have not been compared different doses of nitrogen but different crop production systems, although it is known that in the organic system only natural fertilizers was used while in the integrated system additionally mineral fertilization. In addition, to the production system, the distribution of assimilates was also influenced by the quality of the soil. Comparing only the organic system, it is noted that the higher index was achieved on heavier soil [21]. This confirms the well-known relationship that on the fertile soils the yield is higher. In presented study such relationship respected only for organic system. In the integrated system, this dependence did not take place.

Noteworthy is small impact of weather conditions prevailing in the individual years on the distribution of assimilates to different part of plant. In all years the share of tuber in total biomass was very similar. No strict correlations between the value of the harvest index and a Sielianino‘v coefficient was also found in earlier studies [16], however Mazurczyk et al. [13] has found relationship between weather condition and value of harvest index

Among of 4 tested varieties, 3 of them included to very early or early maturity group and only 1 for mid late. Despite this, the distribution of assimilates was different. From the observations and previous studies it is known that the development model of early and late varieties of potatoes is slightly different [3, 15, 18]. Early varieties are generally characterized by lower aboveground mass than the later once, but also produce a lower yield of tubers, hence the share of tubers in total biomass may remain at a similar level. In our study the highest share of tubers in total biomass was obtained for early cultivar Vineta, which produced the highest tuber yield and the lowest for mid early cultivar Gustaw, which produced the highest above ground biomass.

A share tuber in total biomass for all varieties and years of research, ranged from 47.1 to 78.8% with a coefficient of variation ratio of 16.0. Such large range indicates the wide possibilities formation of assimilates distribution by genetic as well as climate and soil factors.

CONCLUSION

The highest influence on assimilates distribution to usable and non-usable part of plant had growing site and cultivar. Farming system and weather conditions during growing season did not significantly influence the share of tuber in total plant biomass.

There was significant interaction between farming system and place of growing regards to total biomass and tuber yield. Under organic system on lighter soil the total biomass and yield was slightly lower than on heavier soil but under integrated system the relation was diverse.

There was relatively small diversity of varieties in regard to the share of tubers in total biomass.

REFERENCES

  1. Belanger G., Walsh J.R., Richards J.E., Milburn P.H., Ziadi N., 2001. Tuber growth and biomass partitioning of two potato cultivars grown under different N fertilization rates with and without irrigation. Am. J. Pot. Res., 78, 109–117.
  2. Beukema H.P., Zaag van der. D.E., 1990. Introduction to potato production Pudoc. Wageningen, The Nederland, 13–23, 42–52.
  3. Cutter E.G., 1992. Structure and development of the potato plant [in:] Harris P.M. (ed). The potato crop. Chapmanand Hall, London, 65–161.
  4. Dwelle R.B., 1985. Photosynthesis and assimilate partitioning [in:] Li P.H. (ed.) Potato Physiology. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, 35–58.
  5. Ewing E.E., Sandlan K.P., 1995. Biomass partitioning in the potato : consideration for modeling [in:] P. Kabat et al. (eds.). Modeling and parametrization of the soil- plant- atmosphere system. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, 7–9.
  6. Firman D.M., Allen E.J., 1988. Field measurements of photosynthetic rate of potatoes grown under different amounts of nitrogen fertilizer. J. Agric. Sci., 11, 151–163.
  7. Firman D.M., Allen E.J., 1989. Relationship between light interception, ground cover and leaf area index in potatoes. J. Agric. Sci., 113, 355–359.
  8. Gawrońska H., Dwelle R.B., Pavek J.J., 1990. Partitioning of photoassimilates by potato plants (Solanum tuberosum L.) as influence by irradiance. Am. Potato J., 67,163–176.
  9. Hey R.K.M., 1995. Harvest index: a review of its use in plant breeding and crop physiology. Ann. App. Biol., 126, 197–216.
  10. Jefferis R.A., MacKerron D.K.L., 1989. Radiation interception and growth of irrigated and droughted potato (Solanum tuberosum). Field Crop Res., 22, 101–102.
  11. Kuś J., Stalenga J., 1998. Plonowanie kilku odmian ziemniaka uprawianych w systemach integrowanym i ekologicznym. [Yielding a few potato cultivars under integrated and organic systems]. Rocz. AR Poznań, CCCVII, 52, 1, 169–174 [in Polish].
  12. Mazurczyk W., Lis B., 2000. Wpływ deficytu i nadmiaru azotu w roślinie ziemniaka na gromadzenie i dystrybucję biomasy. [Effect of the shortage and excess of nitrogen in the potato plant on biomass accumulation and distribution]. Acta Agrobot., 53, 47–56 [in Polish].
  13. Mazurczyk W., Wierzbicka A., Trawczyński C., 2009. Harvest index of potato crop grown under different nitrogen and water supply. Acta Sci. Pol., Agricultura, 8 (4), 15–21.
  14. Rosen C.J., Bierman P.M., 2012. Potato yield and tuber set as affected by phosphorus fertilization. Am. Potato J., 85, 110–120.
  15. Szutkowska M., 2009. Rozwój roślin, a plonowanie bardzo wczesnych odmian ziemniaka. [Potato plant development and fielding of very early cultivars]. Ziem. Pol., 1, 19–23 [in Polish].

Accepted for print: 9.02.2016


Krystyna Zarzyńska
Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute – NRI,
Potato Agronomy Department, Jadwisin, Poland
ul Szaniawskiego 15
Jadwisin, Poland
email: k.zarzynska@ihar.edu.pl

Wojciech Goliszewski
Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute – NRI,
Potato Agronomy Department, Jadwisin, Poland
ul Szaniawskiego 15
Jadwisin, Poland

Dominika Boguszewska-Mańkowska
Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute – NRI,
Potato Agronomy Department, Jadwisin, Poland
ul Szaniawskiego 15
Jadwisin, Poland

Responses to this article, comments are invited and should be submitted within three months of the publication of the article. If accepted for publication, they will be published in the chapter headed 'Discussions' and hyperlinked to the article.