Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities (EJPAU) founded by all Polish Agriculture Universities presents original papers and review articles relevant to all aspects of agricultural sciences. It is target for persons working both in science and industry,regulatory agencies or teaching in agricultural sector. Covered by IFIS Publishing (Food Science and Technology Abstracts), ELSEVIER Science - Food Science and Technology Program, CAS USA (Chemical Abstracts), CABI Publishing UK and ALPSP (Association of Learned and Professional Society Publisher - full membership). Presented in the Master List of Thomson ISI.
2010
Volume 13
Issue 4
Topic:
Horticulture
ELECTRONIC
JOURNAL OF
POLISH
AGRICULTURAL
UNIVERSITIES
Dyduch J. , Najda A. 2010. YIELDING AND QUALITY OF GARLIC LEAVES. PART I. YIELD AND ITS STRUCTURE, EJPAU 13(4), #19.
Available Online: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume13/issue4/art-19.html

YIELDING AND QUALITY OF GARLIC LEAVES. PART I. YIELD AND ITS STRUCTURE

Jan Dyduch, Agnieszka Najda
Department of Vegetable Crops and Medicinal Plants, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland

 

ABSTRACT

Studies carried out in 2006-2009 dealt with the evaluation of the size and yield of winter cultivated garlic leaves (local ecotype "R") depending on reproductive material used (cloves and air bulbils) as well as cultivation locality (high unheated foil tunnel, field). Plant's height, leaf number, whole plant weight, weight of the above ground parts, total, and commercial yield were determined. Plants growing in unheated foil tunnel were the highest, while those grown on a filed – the shortest. It was found that the plant's height was the most affected by the type of reproductive material. Plants growing from cloves were taller than those from air bulbils. Number of leaves per a plant, whole plant weight, weight of the above ground parts, total, and commercial yields were characterized by similar dependencies.

Key words: garlic, Allium sativum, growing method, yielding, harvest of leaves.

INTRODUCTION

Garlic – due to its gustatory, dietetic, and medicinal properties – is well-grounded among onion vegetables family. The pro-health features both of raw and processed garlic (including medicines) are particularly appreciated, thus it has been widely examined in a view of agrotechnics, dietetics [1,2,5,7,8,13,19,20,32], and phytotherapy [10,12,14,15,16,21,24,25,30,31].

Garlic cloves (both raw and processed) are most often used, while its leaves are not so readily consumed as possible. However, Asian countries, Balkans in Europe, and Podkarpacie in Poland have longer tradition in that view [7,8,9].

Cultivated garlic leaves can be achieved at early spring and they are a valuable source of biologically active substances such as minerals, antioxidants (carotenoids, L-ascorbic acid, flavonols), as well as sulfur compounds [3,4,10,12,14,17,24,25,28].

Leaves from onion vegetables (onion, shallot, Welsh onion, chives) may be obtained early spring from accelerated cultivations in greenhouse, foil tunnels, and field plantations protected with various covers. Thus, larger yields can be achieved and their supply period on markets can be also prolonged [3,4,7,8,9,11,18,22,23,26,27,29].

The air bulbs at garlic producing generative shoots are a very good reproduction material, while cloves can be used for consumption or pharmaceutical purposes. The air bulbils are easier sown with a help of precision seeder, they are characterized with better phytosanitary features, and grown plants produce large and high-quality yields [4,5,6,8,9,13,19,20].

Therefore, the present research dealt with the evaluating of the yields and quality of cultivated garlic leaves depending on a growing place (foil tunnel, field) and reproduction material type (cloves, air bulbils).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The winter cultivated garlic (local ecotype "R") grown from clove setting and inflorescence bulbils in a field and high foil tunnel for early harvest of leaves, was the subject of study. The agrotechnical experiment was carried out in 2006–2009 in The Experimental Farm Felin (University of Life Sciences in Lublin). The soil under garlic cultivation was prepared in accordance to common agrotechnical recommendations. Wild celery was a forecrop for garlic during entire experiment. The garlic cloves (from 2.0 to 2.5 g each) and air bulbils (6–10 mm in diameter), after treating with mordant Funaben T, were set in autumn (the end of October) of 2006, 2007, and 2008 into plots of 1.6 m2 area each (0.8×2.0 m), at 20×5 cm spacing (40 plants per a row = 100 plants·m-2) in four replicates. During the harvest, measurements of 10 randomly selected 10 plants from every plot were made (number of leaves per a plant, plant height). The plant height was measured from the ground level up to the top of the longest leaf. The garlic was harvested just before generative shoots producing, i.e. 17 May 2007, 19 May 2008, and 16 May 2009 in foil tunnel, as well as 1 June 2007, 6 June 2008, and 2 June 2009 in field. Plant height, leaf number, plant weight, weight of the above ground parts, as well as total and commercial yields were determined directly after the garlic harvest.

Measurement results were subject to statistical processing using variance analysis and Tukey confidence intervals at significance level of p = 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Cultivated garlic growing in the foil tunnel was harvested earlier by 14 to 18 days as compared with that grown in the field, regardless of the type of reproduction material.

The plant height and number of leaves per a plant was determined just at the harvest (Table 1). A significant dependence of these parameters and experimental factors was recorded. Significantly higher plants with larger number of leaves per a rosette were achieved in a case of clove setting in foil tunnel, which was observed in all experimental years.

Table 1. Biometrical features of garlic plants growing for leaves harvest

Planting
material

Places of growing

Weight of plant
(cm)

Number of leaves
(pcs · plant-1)

2007

2008

2009

mean

2007

2008

2009

mean

Cloves

unheated foil tunnel

37.4

34.2

37.8

36.5

6.0

5.1

6.1

5.7

field

31.6

27.8

33.3

30.9

5.0

4.0

5.2

4.7

mean

34.5

31.0

35.6

33.7

5.5

4.6

5.7

5.3

Air bulbils

unheated foil tunnel

26.0

22.7

27.3

25.3

4.3

3.5

4.3

4.0

field

22.2

19.2

23.1

21.5

3.6

3.0

3.4

3.3

mean

24.1

21.0

25.2

23.4

4.0

3.3

3.9

3.7

Mean

unheated foil tunnel

31.6

28.5

32.6

30.9

5.2

4.3

5.2

4.9

field

26.9

23.5

28.2

26.2

4.3

3.5

4.3

4.0

mean

29.3

26.0

30.4

28.6

4.8

3.9

4.8

4.5

LSD0.05

               

planting material (A)

     

7.931

     

0.917

places of growing (B)

     

3.017

     

0.083

years (C)

     

1.001

     

0.091

interaction (A×B×C)

     

4.001

     

0.402

Many authors indicate that higher yields in a field cultivation can be achieved when garlic cloves, instead of air bulbils, are used [3,7,18,19]. That thesis was also confirmed in present research including garlic cultivated for leaf harvest in foil tunnel.

Domestic literature contains few works upon size and structure of cultivated garlic leaf yields. Such study was performed near Lublin [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,17,18] and Szczecin [22,23]. In present experiment, plants grown from cloves under foil tunnel (Table 2) were characterized by larger total and above ground parts weight, while differences depending on experimental results were significant.

Table 2. Mass of garlic plants growing for leaves harvest

Planting
material

Places of growing

Mass of whole plant
(g · plant -1)

Mass of above ground part
(g · plant -1)

2007

2008

2009

mean

2007

2008

2009

mean

Cloves

unheated foil tunnel

29.87

27.20

31.10

29.39

25.11

22.10

26.40

24.54

field

25.27

22.70

26.40

24.79

18.06

17.00

18.20

17.75

mean

27.57

25.00

28.80

27.12

21.59

19.60

22.30

21.15

Air bulbils

unheated foil tunnel

21.57

19.80

21.90

21.09

15.81

13.30

16.60

15.24

field

18.61

15.90

19.90

18.14

12.81

11.60

13.10

12.50

mean

20.09

17.85

20.90

19.61

14.31

12.50

14.90

13.90

Mean

unheated foil tunnel

25.72

23.50

26.50

25.24

20.46

17.70

21.50

19.89

field

21.94

19.30

23.15

21.46

15.43

14.30

15.65

15.13

mean

23.83

21.40

24.83

23.35

17.94

16.00

18.60

17.51

LSD0.05

               

planting material (A)

     

6.546

     

6.504

places of growing (B)

     

3.074

     

2.072

years (C)

     

1.007

     

0.725

interaction (A×B×C)

     

3.206

     

2.495

At onion vegetables cultivation for early harvest, applying the foil cover considerably enhanced the yields of onion with green chives [26,29], shallots [11,19,27], and garlic [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,18,22,23]. Commercial yields of garlic leaves in cultivation for bunches oscillated from 1.14 to 1.97 kg·m-2.

In present experiment, plants grown from cloves produced the leaf commercial yields from 1.73 kg·m-2 (field) to 2.44 kg·m-2 (tunnel), which was from 73.2% (field) to 85.3% (tunnel) of the total yields, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3. Yielding of garlic plants growing for leaves harvest

Planting material

Places of growing

Total yield
(kg  m -2)

Marketable yield
(kg  m -2)

Marketable yield in total
(%)

2007

2008

2009

mean

2007

2008

2009

mean

2007

2008

2009

mean

Cloves

unheated foil tunnel

2.89

2.63

3.06

2.86

2.49

2.19

2.64

2.44

86.2

83.3

86.3

85.3

field

2.40

2.15

2.56

2.37

1.75

1.66

1.78

1.73

72.9

77.2

69.5

73.2

mean

2.65

2.39

2.81

2.62

2.12

1.93

2.21

2.09

80.8

80.3

78.6

79.9

Air bulbils

unheated foil tunnel

2.01

1.85

2.09

1.98

1.51

1.27

1.61

1.46

75.1

68.6

77.0

73.6

field

1.70

1.44

1.88

1.67

1.19

1.09

1.25

1.18

70.0

75.7

66.5

70.7

mean

1.86

1.65

1.99

1.83

1.35

1.18

1.43

1.32

74.2

72.0

72.2

72.8

Mean

unheated foil tunnel

2.45

2.24

2.57

2.42

2.00

1.73

2.13

1.95

81.6

77.2

82.9

80.6

field

2.05

1.80

2.22

2.02

1.47

1.37

1.51

1.45

71.7

76.1

68.0

71.9

mean

2.25

2.02

2.40

2.22

1.76

1.55

1.82

1.71

78.2

76.7

75.8

76.9

LSD0.05

                       

planting material (A)

     

0.470

     

0.581

       

places of growing (B)

     

0.211

     

0.300

       

years (C)

     

0.103

     

0.207

       

interaction (A×B×C)

     

0.266

     

0.408

       

Plants grown from the air bulbs produced commercial yields at the level from 1.18 kg·m-2 (field) to 1.46 kg·m-2 (tunnel), which made up 70.7% (field) to 73.6% (tunnel) of the total yields.

Significantly higher yield was achieved in foil tunnel as well as when cloves as reproduction material were used.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. Garlic for leaf harvest can be cultivated both in a field and foil tunnels. Significantly higher and earlier yields were achieved under foil tunnel.

  2. Both cloves and air bulbs can be used as a reproduction material. However, garlic plants grown from cloves produced significantly higher commercial yields.

  3. Significance of both experimental factors in all years of study was confirmed. Significantly higher commercial yields of plants were achieved, when garlic was grown from cloves under foil tunnel.


REFERENCES

  1. Adamicki F., 2005. Onion production, marketing and research in Poland. Veg. Crops Res. Bull., 62, 21–28.

  2. Ang-Lee M., Moss J., Yuan Hunsu., 2001. Herbal medicines and perioperative care. JAMA. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 286 (2), 208–216.

  3. Dyduch J., Najda A., 2000. Estimation of the biological value of winter garlic leaves from early cultivation on bunch crop. Part I. Plants grown from clove planting. EJPAU 3(2), #05 http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume3/issue2/horticulture/art-05.html.

  4. Dyduch J., Najda A. 2001a. Estimation of the biological value of winter garlic leaves from early cultivation on bunch crop. Part II. Plants grown from air bulbils planting. EJPAU 4(2), #04 http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume4/issue2/horticulture/art-04.html

  5. Dyduch J., Najda A., 2001b. Wpływ dorodności cebulek powietrznych czosnku strzałkującego (Allium sativum L.) na cechy morfologiczne i jakość wyrosłych z nich roślin. Annales UMCS, sec. EEE, Horticultura, 295–299.

  6. Dyduch J., Najda A., 2002. Characteristics of winter garlic (Allium sativum L.) plants grown up from air bulbs. Allium Improvement Newsletter, Madison USA, 12, 20–22.

  7. Dyduch J, Najda A., Sawicka A., 2007a. Yielding of the winter garlic (Allium sativum L.) cultivated for spring harvest. Party I. Plants grown up from cloves. Allium Improvement Newsletter. Madison USA, 17, 8–12.

  8. Dyduch J, Najda A., Sawicka A., 2007b. Yielding of the winter garlic (Allium sativum L.) cultivated for spring harvest. Party II. Plants grown up from air bulbils. Allium Improvement Newsletter, Madison USA, 17, 9–12.

  9. Dyduch J., Najda A. 2008., Yields and quality of garlic leaves achieved from air bulb setting cultivated for early harvest. Proceedings of Scientific Conference "Progress in Onion Vegetables Cultivation Technology". Skierniewice, 37–38.

  10. Grudziński J.P., Frankiewicz-Jozko A., Bany J., 2001. Diallyl sulfide – a flawour component from garlic (Allium sativum L.) attenuates lipid peroxidation in mice infected with Trichuella spiralis. Phyto-medicine, 8 (3), 174–177.

  11. Gruszecki R., Tendaj M., 2002. The effect of bulbs planting time and use of flat covers on growth and yield of shallot grown for the harvest with the fresh green shoots. Veget. Crops Res. Bull. 57, 23–28.

  12. Hasik J., 1988. New concepts on antiatherogenic action of garlic. Herba. Pol., 44 (2), 148–150.

  13. Jenderek M., 1998. Generative reproduction of garlic. Zesz. Nauk. AR Kraków, 1, 57, 141–145.

  14. Kędzia A., 2000. Garlic oil action towards anaerobic bacteria isolated from oral cavity and upper airways. Postępy Fitot. 1, www.borgis.pl/czytelnia/pf/2000/01/05.php.

  15. Lutomski J., 2001. Fascination on garlic – past and today. Postępy Fitoterapii, 1, 7–14.

  16. Maidment D., Dembny Z., Watts D., 2001. The antibacterial activity of 12 Allium agains Escherichia coli. Nutr. Food Sci., 31, 4/5, 238–241.

  17. Najda A., Dyduch J. 2008. Antioxidant capacity and composition of extracts made of garlic leaves (Allium sativum L.) depending on cultivation site. Proceedings of Scientific Conference "Progress in Onion Vegetables Cultivation Technology". Skierniewice, 53–54.

  18. Najda A., Dyduch J., 2008. Yields and quality of garlic leaves achieved from cloves setting for early harvest. Proceedings of Scientific Conference "Progress in Onion Vegetables Cultivation Technology". Skierniewice, 55–56.

  19. Orłowski M., Rekowska E., 1989. Influence of clove weight and their setting spacing on garlic yields. Biul. Warz. Supl., 2, 85–89.

  20. Orłowski M., Rekowska E., Dobromilska R., 1994. The effect on the yield of garlic (Allium sativum L.) of autumn and spring planting using different methods of seedstalk trimming. Fol. Hortic. 6, 2, 79–89.

  21. Perłowska M., Kaniszewski S., 1992. Influence of the soil type and watering on garlic yields. Biul. Warz., 38, 73–80.

  22. Rekowska E., 2007. Influence of covers and ways of clove setting on garlic yielding in cultivation for bunches. Rocz. AR. im. Augusta Cieszkowskiego w Poznaniu, Ogrodnictwo, 43, 589–593.

  23. Rekowska E., Skupień K., 2008. Influence of some agrotechnical factors on yielding and chemical composition of winter garlic cultivated for bunches. Proceedings of Scientific Conference "Progress in Onion Vegetables Cultivation Technology". Skierniewice, 57–58.

  24. Rejeshkumar N.V., Ramadasan K., 2001. Cancare – a herbal formulation inhibits chemically induced tumours in experimental animals. Ind. J. Experim. Biol.

  25. Sendl A., 1995. Allium sativum and Allium ursinum; Part 1. Chemistry, analysis, history, botany. Gustaw Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart. Jena. New York. Phytomedicine, 4, 323–339.

  26. Tendaj M., Gruszecki R., 2002. Influence of scallion setting date and flat cover application on the yield of early onion with green chives. Annales UMCS, Sec. EEE Horticultura, XI, 61–69.

  27. Tendaj M., Mysiak B., 2004. Usefulness of shallots for growing under greenhouse conditions. Folia Univ. Agric. Stetin. Agricultura 2004, 395–398.

  28. Mysiak B., Tendaj M., 2006a. Content of flavonoids  in some Allium species grown for green bunching. Veg. Crops. Res. Bull., 65, 105–110.

  29. Tendaj M., Mysiak B., 2006b. Yielding of common onion and shallots cultivated for bunches. Folia Hortic. Sup. 2, 186–191.

  30. Tsao ShyhMing, Yin MeiChin., 2001. In-vitro antimicrobial activity of four diallyl sulphides occurring naturally in garlic and Chinense leek oils. J. Med. Microbiol., 50, 7, 646–649.

  31. Usha K., Saroja S., 2001. Antitubercular potential of selected plant materials. J. Med. Aromatic Plant Sci., 22/23, 182–184.

  32. Williamson G., 1999. Functional Foods – a new challenge for the food chemists. Proceedigs of Euro Food Chem X, Budapest. 1, 192.

 

Accepted for print: 25.11.2010


Jan Dyduch
Department of Vegetable Crops and Medicinal Plants,
University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland
58 Leszczyński Street, 20-068 Lublin, Poland
email: jan.dyduch@up.lublin.pl

Agnieszka Najda
Department of Vegetable Crops and Medicinal Plants,
University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland
Kr. Leszczyńskiego 58, 20-068 Lublin, Poland
email: agnieszka.najda@up.lublin.pl

Responses to this article, comments are invited and should be submitted within three months of the publication of the article. If accepted for publication, they will be published in the chapter headed 'Discussions' and hyperlinked to the article.