Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities (EJPAU) founded by all Polish Agriculture Universities presents original papers and review articles relevant to all aspects of agricultural sciences. It is target for persons working both in science and industry,regulatory agencies or teaching in agricultural sector. Covered by IFIS Publishing (Food Science and Technology Abstracts), ELSEVIER Science - Food Science and Technology Program, CAS USA (Chemical Abstracts), CABI Publishing UK and ALPSP (Association of Learned and Professional Society Publisher - full membership). Presented in the Master List of Thomson ISI.
2008
Volume 11
Issue 4
Topic:
Food Science and Technology
ELECTRONIC
JOURNAL OF
POLISH
AGRICULTURAL
UNIVERSITIES
Szafrańska A. , Cacak-Pietrzak G. , Sułek A. 2008. INFLUENCE OF NITROGEN FERTILIZATION AND RETARDANTS ON BAKING VALUE OF THE WINTER WHEAT, EJPAU 11(4), #28.
Available Online: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume11/issue4/art-28.html

INFLUENCE OF NITROGEN FERTILIZATION AND RETARDANTS ON BAKING VALUE OF THE WINTER WHEAT

Anna Szafrańska1, Grażyna Cacak-Pietrzak2, Alicja Sułek3
1 Department of Grain Processing and Bakery, Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology, Warsaw, Poland
2 Division of Cereal Technology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Poland
3 Department of Cereal Crop Production, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Production, State Research Institute, Puławy, Poland

 

ABSTRACT

The material under examination was the grain of winter wheat cultivar Rysa from a field experiment carried out during a three-year-period (2000-2003) in ODR Kalsk. The effect of increase level of nitrogen fertilization (90, 120 and 150 kg N · ha-1) and retardants (Bercema, Cerone, Bercema and Cerone) on the baking value of wheat were tested. Total wheat flour protein and gluten content increased significantly with increasing in nitrogen fertilization dose. Agricultural factors had no significant influence on the gluten quality, Zeleny test and water absorption. Higher doses of the nitrogen fertilization had positive effect on the α-amylase activity and the rheological dough properties. An increase in nitrogen fertilization caused an increase in dough development time and stability time but decrease its softening. Bread wasn't differed with agrotechnical factors and was characterized by high volume and regularly crumb porosity.

Key words: baking value, nitrogen fertilization, retardants, winter wheat.

INTRODUCTION

Wheat plays important role in global economy with regard to its production potential and nutritional value. The main aim of wheat production is gain raw material for consumption – to produce flour and bread baking. Wheat should be characteristic on suitable quality parameters which depend on properties of cultivars, weather condition during grain growth and development, soil conditions and agrotechnical factors. Soil fertilization, especially nitrogen fertilization and crop protection play a major role in creating technological value of wheat [18]. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of varying nitrogen fertilization and retardants on baking value of the winter wheat cultivar Rysa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experimental material was winter wheat cultivar Rysa. The grain originated from field experiment carried out during three-year-period (2000-2003) in the ODR Kalsk. Field experiment was laid out as the method of split-plot randomized blocks in 3 replications. The first factor of the experiment was different nitrogen fertilization level: 90, 120 and 150 kg N · ha-1. The nitrogen doses were applied at the following phases: 60% of doses before sowing, 30% of doses during culm emergence, 10% of doses in the heading. The second factor of experiment were retardants, applied at the following phases:

The grain was milled using the Brabender Quadrumat Senior laboratory mill. Flour baking quality was determined through the following analyses:

The results were subjected to statistical analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Wheat grain protein content plays important role in baking value estimation. The wheat protein content depends on cultivars but may vary from weather, soil condition and agrotechnical factors such as nitrogen fertilization. Achremowicz et al. [1,2], Kościelniak and Rothkaehl [8], Mazurek and Sułek [13], Scheroma et al [19] and previous works carried out in Division of Cereal Technology Warsaw University of Life Science [3,4] reported the increase of total protein content with increasing nitrogen fertilization dose. Results mentioned in previous studies were also confirmed by results in this study (Table 1). The flour milled from grain which was fertilized the smallest nitrogen treatment level (90 kg N · ha-1) was characterized by the smallest protein content (average: 11.79%). Significant increase in protein content was observed with increasing nitrogen fertilization dose to 120 kg N · ha-1 (protein content = 12.87%). An increase of nitrogen fertilization dose to 150 kg N · ha-1 caused increasing in flour protein content to 13.75%. However, there was no significant differences between the highest 150 N · ha-1 treatment and middle 120 N · ha-1 treatment. An increase in total protein content with applications of retardants have been reported [6,10,15], however, Cichy [5] reported that retardants caused negative effect on protein content. No significant differences between retardants and total protein content were observed in this study.

In this study increase in nitrogen fertilization dose caused also increasing in wet gluten content (26.8; 28.9 and 30.9% respectively) (Table 1). Wet gluten content was significantly different between the smallest 90 N · ha-1 treatment and highest 150 N · ha-1 treatment. The positive effect of nitrogen treatment resulted in the highest quantity of gluten have been reported [3, 13, 14, 17]. Podolska and Stankowski [17] reported higher wet gluten content than control (increase 10%). In this study an increase in nitrogen fertilization dose from 90 to 150 N · ha-1 caused 14% increasing in wet gluten content. According to Leszczyńska and Grabiński [9] retardants may decrease wet gluten content. In this study there was no significant impact on that trait. Gluten Index, which is an indicator of gluten strength, in this study was above 90. Gluten Index must be genetically controlled because none of experiment factors improved its quality. An increase in sedimentation ratio with nitrogen fertilization dose have been reported [4, 8, 12, 20]. However in this study there was no significant impact on that trait.

The activity of amylolitic enzymes is important index of baking value which influence on water absorption, intensity of dough fermentation, crust and crumb color. All the flour samples in this study were characterized by low activity of amylolitic enzymes (falling number over 300 s.) (Table 1). According to Kościelniak and Rothkaehl [8] and Mazurek et al [12] nitrogen fertilization have no effect on the activity of amylolitic enzymes of wheat flour. However, cultivars properties and weather conditions during growth play a major role in determining the activity of amylolitic enzymes. In this study an increase in nitrogen fertilization treatment from 90 to 150 kg N · ha-1 caused significant decrease in activity of amylolitic enzymes (12% increase in the falling number value). According to Leszczyńska and Grabiński [9] retardants may cause an increase in activity of amylolitic enzymes. However, in this study, no significant differences between retardants and activity of amylolitic enzymes were observed.

Table 1. Chemical properties of  flour depending on nitrogen fertilization and retardants

Experimental factors

Protein total
 [%]

Wet gluten
 [%]

Gluten index

Zeleny test
 [cm3]

Falling number
 [s]

Nitrogen fertilization (kg·ha-1)
90
120
150



11.79b
12.87a
13.75a



26.8b
28.9ab
30.9a



93a
92a
94a



34a
35a
41a



360b
365ab
405a

Retardant
control
Bercema
Cerone
Bercema+Cerone


12.65a
12.83a
12.83a
12.90a


28.4a
28.8a
29.0a
29.3a


93a
93a
92a
92a


38a
36a
36a
37a


370a
373a
383a
380a

a,b – homogeneous groups

Farinograph Test is a dough testing instrument which can be used to determine rheological characteristic and gluten properties of dough during kneading. The Farinograph Test is also used to evaluate the water absorption capacity of flour. Several authors [16,17] reported that an increase of nitrogen fertilizations results in increases in water absorption; others [3, 11] said that there is no effect on this parameter. No significant differences between increase in nitrogen fertilization and water absorption were observed in this study (Table 2). An increase in nitrogen fertilization cause an increase in stability time and development time and decrease in softening (Table 2). On the previous study [3,20] nitrogen treatment had no effect on stability time. According to Podolska [16] 120 kg N · ha-1 treatment caused an increase in stability time and decreased its softening. A decrease in dough softening was also reported by Mazurek et all [11]. According to Kościelniak and Rothkaehl [8] very high nitrogen dose (240 kg N · ha-1) get worse in most rheological parameters compare to 180 kg N · ha-1 treatment. No significant differences between retardants and other parameters were observed in this study.

Table 2. Rheological properties and baking date depending on nitrogen fertilization and retardants

Experimental factors

Water absorption
[%]

Dough development
[min.]

Dough stability
[min.]

Dough softening
[FU]

Quality number

Volume of bread
[cm3]

Porosity of crumb
[%]

Nitrogen fertilization
(kg·ha-1)
90
120
150



55.3a
55.3a
55.9a



3.1b
4.0ab
5.6a



3.2b
5.0b
9.2a



48a
34ab
20b



71b
107b
160a



518a
510a
581a



74.7a
75.0a
76.2a

Retardant
control
Bercema
Cerone
Bercema+Cerone


55.4a
55.5a
55.5a
55.5a


3.9a
4.1a
4.2a
4.6a


6.5a
5.3a
5.4a
6.0a


32a
33a
39a
32a


109a
118a
117a
106a


538a
509a
548a
551a


75.1a
75.1a
75.4a
75.7a

a,b – homogeneous groups

Breads gained from breadmaking tests were characterized by appropriate flavour, shape and crust color. Breads weren't differed with agrotechnical factors and were characterized by high loaf volume (averaged 530 cm3) and regularly porosity of crumb (Table 2). Loaf volume, in this and the previous studies [3, 20], hasn't depended on nitrogen fertilization level. However, Mazurek et al [12] reported that loaf volume differed with nitrogen fertilization. According to Ceglińska et al [4] 90 kg N · ha-1 treatment caused an increased in loaf volume. Results of this and previous study [3] as well as Mazurek et al [12] shows that nitrogen fertilization hasn't affected porosity of crumb. In this study retardants have no effect on organoleptic characteristic, loaf volume and porosity of crumb.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. Protein content and gluten content increased with increasing nitrogen fertilization. Agrotechnical factors had no effect on quality of gluten, Zeleny test of flour sedimentation and water absorption of flour.

  2. Both farinographic traits: development time and stability time increased with increasing nitrogen fertilization dose, but dough softening decreased.

  3. There were no significant differences between bread quality and application of an increased nitrogen fertilization.


REFERENCES

  1. Achremowicz B., Dziamba Sz., Styk B., 1988. Wpływ nawożenia mineralnego na jakość ziarna trzech odmian pszenicy ozimej [ Influence of mineral fertilization on three winter wheat cultivars value]. Biul. IHAR 166, 7-15 [in Polish].

  2. Achremowicz B., Borkowska H., Styk B., Grundas S., 1995. Wpływ nawożenia azotowego na jakość glutenu pszenicy jarej [The effect of nitrogen fertilization on gluten quality in spring wheat grain]. Biul. IHAR 193, 29-34 [in Polish].

  3. Cacak-Pietrzak G., Ceglińska A., Haber T., 1999. Wartość technologiczna wybranych odmian pszenicy ozimej w zależności od zróżnicowanego nawożenia azotowego [The effect of differential nitrogen fertilization on a technological value of selected varieties of winter wheat]. Pam. Puł. 118, 45-56 [in Polish].

  4. Ceglińska A., Haber T., Gawrońska-Kulesza A., Szajewska A., Kon A., 2002. Wartość technologiczna pszenicy w zależności od stosowanych zabiegów agrotechnicznych [The effect of agricultural treatment on technological value of wheat]. Przegl. Zboż.-Młyn. 46(12), 8-12 [in Polish].

  5. Cichy H., 1997. Reakcja pszenicy ozimej na stosowanie fungicydów i antywylegacza [Reaction of winter wheat to applied fungicides and retardant]. Biul. IHAR 204, 259-265 [in Polish].

  6. Dziamba Sz, 1987. Wpływ antywylegacza (CCC) i nawożenia na plonowanie, elementy struktury plonu oraz zawartość białka i lizyny w ziarnie pszenżyta, żyta i pszenicy [Effect of CCC and fertilization on yielding, yield structure elements, protein and lysine content in the grain of triticale, rye and wheat]. Biul. IHAR 161, 105-112 [in Polish].

  7. Jakubczyk T., Haber T. (ed.), 1983. Analiza zbóż i przetworów zbożowych [Analysis of cereals and cereale products]. Wyd. SGGW-AR, Warsaw [in Polish].

  8. Kościelniak W., Rothkaehl J., 2000. Wpływ nawożenia azotem na plonowanie i wartość technologiczną ziarna jakościowych odmian pszenicy ozimej [The effect of nitrogen fertilization on yielding and grain quality of winter wheat cultivars]. Przegl. Zboż-Młyn. 44(7), 8-11 [in Polish].

  9. Leszczyńska D., Grabiński J., 2003. Efektywność retardantów w zasiewach pszenicy ozimej w zależności od dawek i terminów aplikacji [Effectiveness of retardants in winter wheat depending on dose and application term]. Progr. Plant Protect. 43(2), 775-777 [in Polish].

  10. Ma B. L., Leibovitch S., Smith D. L., 1994. Plant growth regulator effects on protein content and yield of spring barley and wheat. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 172, 9-18.

  11. Mazurek J., Biskupski A., Maj L., 1987. Wpływ nawożenia azotowego i ilości wysiewu na plonowanie oraz wartość technologiczną odmian pszenicy jarej [The nitrogen fertilization and sowing rate effect on yielding and technologic value of summer wheat varietes]. Biul. IHAR 164, 215-226 [in Polish].

  12. Mazurek J., Jaśkiewicz B., Klupczyński Z., 1999. Plonowanie i jakość ziarna pszenicy ozimej w zależności od techniki nawożenia azotem [Yielding and quality of winter wheat in relation to nitrogen fertilization techniques]. Pam. Puł. 118, 257-261 [in Polish].

  13. Mazurek J., Sułek A., 1999. Wpływ różnych dawek i technik nawożenia azotem na plon i cechy jakościowe ziarna pszenicy jarej [Effect of different doses and technologies of nitrogen fertilization on yield and grain quality of spring wheat]. Pam. Puł. 118, 263-269 [in Polish].

  14. Pechanek U., Karger A., Gröger S., Charvat B., Schöggl G., Lelley T., 1997. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on quality of flour protein components dough properties, and breadmaking quality of wheat. Cereal Chem. 74(6), 800-805.

  15. Pisulewska E., 1997. Wysokość i jakość plonu jarych i ozimych mieszanek zbożowo-strączkowych [Yielding and yield quality of spring and winter cereal-legume mixtures]. Zesz. Nauk. AR Krak., Diss. 221 [in Polish].

  16. Podolska G., 2003. Wartość technologiczna ziarna pszenicy ozimej w zależności od dawki nawożenia azotem [Effect of nitrogen fertilization doses on a technological value of winter wheat]. Przegl. Zboż.-Młyn. 47(6), 12-14 [in Polish].

  17. Podolska G., Stankowski S., 2001. Plonowanie i jakość ziarna pszenicy w zależności od gęstości siewu i dawki nawożenia azotem [Yielding and grain quality of winter wheat depending on sowing density and on nitrogen fertilization doses]. Biul. IHAR 218/219, 127-136 [in Polish].

  18. Podolska G., Sułek A., 2002. Główne elementy technologii produkcji decydujące o wysokiej jakości ziarna pszenicy [Seed quality as affected by main components of wheat technology production]. Pam. Puł., 130, 597-605 [in Polish].

  19. Scheromm P., Martin G., Bergoin A., Autran J. C., 1992. Influence of nitrogen fertilization on the potential bread-baking quality of two wheat cultivars differing in their responses to increasing nitrogen supplies. Cereal Chem. 69(6), 664-670.

  20. Sułek A., Cacak-Pietrzak G., Ceglińska A., Haber T., 2002. Wartość technologiczna wybranych odmian pszenicy jarej w zależności od sposobu nawożenia azotem [The effect of differentiated nitrogen fertilization on a technological value of selected cultivars of spring wheat]. Pam. Puł. 130, 707-716 [in Polish].

Accepted for print: 16.12.2008


Anna Szafrańska
Department of Grain Processing and Bakery,
Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology, Warsaw, Poland
Rakowiecka 36, 02-532 Warsaw, Poland
email: szafranska@ibprs.pl

Grażyna Cacak-Pietrzak
Division of Cereal Technology,
Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Poland
Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
email: grazyna_cacak_pietrzak@sggw.pl

Alicja Sułek
Department of Cereal Crop Production,
Institute of Soil Science and Plant Production, State Research Institute, Puławy, Poland
Czartoryskich 8, 24-100 Puławy, Poland
email: Alicja.Sulek@iung.pulawy.pl

Responses to this article, comments are invited and should be submitted within three months of the publication of the article. If accepted for publication, they will be published in the chapter headed 'Discussions' and hyperlinked to the article.