Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities (EJPAU) founded by all Polish Agriculture Universities presents original papers and review articles relevant to all aspects of agricultural sciences. It is target for persons working both in science and industry,regulatory agencies or teaching in agricultural sector. Covered by IFIS Publishing (Food Science and Technology Abstracts), ELSEVIER Science - Food Science and Technology Program, CAS USA (Chemical Abstracts), CABI Publishing UK and ALPSP (Association of Learned and Professional Society Publisher - full membership). Presented in the Master List of Thomson ISI.
2006
Volume 9
Issue 1
Topic:
Animal Husbandry
ELECTRONIC
JOURNAL OF
POLISH
AGRICULTURAL
UNIVERSITIES
Kaproń M. , Janczarek I. , Suska A. , Marchel I. 2006. INTRODUCTORY RESEARCH ON RELATION BETWEEN BIOMETRIC RATES OF GROWING TROTTERS AND PARAMETERS OF THEIR MOVEMENT CAPACITY IN INITIAL TRAINING STAGE, EJPAU 9(1), #28.
Available Online: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume9/issue1/art-28.html

INTRODUCTORY RESEARCH ON RELATION BETWEEN BIOMETRIC RATES OF GROWING TROTTERS AND PARAMETERS OF THEIR MOVEMENT CAPACITY IN INITIAL TRAINING STAGE

Marian Kaproń1, Iwona Janczarek1, Anna Suska2, Iwona Marchel1
1 Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Agricultural University of Lublin, Poland
2 Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Podlaska University of Siedlce, Poland

 

ABSTRACT

The aim of this paper is to initiate nationwide research on trotters, in this case relations between conformation traits of their body and performance features. Material for the research was provided by 60 young trotters registered in the Danish (12) and German (48) herd books of the analysed breeds. The horses were prepared in automn 2004 for taking part in races. Trotters were also subject to 23 zoometric measurements, based on which 15 indices of their body conformation were worked out. Additionally, the evaluation of movement capacity was accomplished, including 1 – step length, its frequency as well as index and speed movement velocityof the analysed horses. Trot was repeated 3 times (starting with the slowest to the fastest one) on a specially marked part of racetrack. The evaluation of relations between measurements and indices of body conformation of the analysed trotters and their movement capacity parameters indicated the following suggestions:

Key words: biometric measurements, horses, movement capacity, trotters.

INTRODUCTION

The history of horse breeding in Poland [3,4,5,15] has not marked any systematic trottter races, which brought about the fact that this type of horses has not been bred on a larger scale. Currently, profound social, political and economic changes caused a far-fetched liberalism in breeding and utlizing different breeds and types of horses. Moreover, the above changes liberated the need to seek spectacular and unknown forms of utilizing horses. They also contributed to a rapid development of private breeding centres, especially in early 90s [2], riding horses in a Western style as well as training and racing attempts of trotters. Breeding of the above type of horses has been recognized by the agreement to carry on trotter breeding and issuing a herd book. However, this kind of breeeding remains at an early stage and the first races were held only in automn 2004. Nonetheless, there are several training centers for trotters of the West European origin in the regions of Pomorze Zachodnie, Warmia and Mazury, Mazowsze and Dolny Slask and two of them have been functioning since mid-90s. The trotters trained there come from breeding centres in Germany and Denmark. After having reached a certain stage of training, they are transported to either their home countries or to take part in races. It is assumed that together with getting experience and different types of promotion of West European trotter breeds, their breeding will become more and more important and are likely to be introduced by an increasing number of Polish breeders.

Taking into account the above reasons and the further development of trotter breeding in Poland, this study has attempted at the rationalization of their training methods and evaluation of their production value through the application of the assessment of relationship between certain measures and body conformation indices of analysed horses and their movement capacity.

The fundamental objective of this research is not only to initiate studies on this horse breed, which is extremely specific for Polish conditions, but also evaluate the relations between body conformation traits of young trotters in their growth and their production value. The findings will serve to provide certain indications regarding their further racing ability. Such an evaluation is significant with a view to considerable financial outlay connected with their breeding, gradual racing implemetation and further exploitation which may turn out completely unprofitable due to a lack of earlier recognition of potential abilities.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Material for the studies was provided by 60 young trotters bred in Germany and Denmark aged between 11 and 30 months, which were prepared for harnessed trotter races in automn 2004.

The examined trotters were subject to zoometric measures, in compliance with the methodology used for half-bloods and racehorses [10], obtaining 23 measures of certain body parts and distances between their morphological points. All the measurements were based on common principles [16] to determine their height at withers, backcrupper and tail base, chest depth and girth, skew body length, length of leg, shoulder, forearm, foreshank and hindshank, croup as well as width of shoulders and croup. It was also suggested in the studies to utilize the distance between certain body points of horses, like hip point-hip joint, hip joint – knee joint, hip joint- point of buttock, hip joint-hock joint, knee joint-hock joint. This method of determining distances has been characterised in the earlier study [7].

Proportions in body conformation of the trotters were analysed by means of the so-called “body conformation index” including: reconformation, chest depth, boniness, croup width and length, shoulder width and eurysomy which have been so far used in numerous studies [15]. They were completed by own indices such as “shoulder part length”, “selected parts of forelimb”, “croup size”, “joint croup length”, “croup triangle” and “hindlimb length”. The formulas of the analysed indices were given in the earlier work [7] connected with the evaluation of relationship between conformation properties and movement capacity of half-blood stallions.

The evaluated trotters, harnessed to training trolleys were tested for their movement capacity on a flat, sandy, 30-metre long racetrack, measuring 5 steps of each horse. The distance was determined based on the length of the distance covered by each trotter starting with the trace of hoof tip of interior leg (after beginning the first step) to the sixth step.

The tested trotters covered the track 3 times. The pace of the trot increased from the slowest to the fastest possible due to a low training advance. The first ride was called “slow”-17-18 kmph, the second “medium”-27-28 kmph, and third “fast”-37-42 kmph. In order to boost the reliability of the analyses, average parameters of movement capacity were established on the basis of average values from the 3 rides.

The evaluated movement capacity parameters included: one step length (in meters with 0.01 m acccuracy) in all 3 rides and step frequency (number of steps per minute).

Both biometric rates of tested trotters and their movement capacity parameters were statistically analysed using simple characteristics. The relationship between examined biometric and movement traits were estmated by means of simple correlations.

RESULTS

Parameters of statistical characteristcs of measures (Table 1) and indices of body conformation of young, growing trotters indicate a phenotype levelling of tested trotters, due to relatively low varibility coefficients (V). Their values are definitely lower than 15%, which is considered the upper limit of variability of statistically analysed traits: in fact, the V values do not exceed 10% in most cases. It should be noted that V – values are low related to the body conformation index (Table 2), where none of them exceeded 10%. The observed tendencies prove the need to analyse biometric conformation traits of young growing trotters, mainly because of their considerable phenotype levelling.

Table 1. Statistic characteristics of biometric measures of tested trotters

Body
measurements

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

n

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

x

153.74

146.3

155.15

142.98

146.82

69.66

172.78

38.53

54.08

27.13

44.61

31.17

19.63

90.83

39.34

51.62

48.87

37.33

38.5

22.43

47.67

73.67

54.02

Min

143

138

147

135

136

62

156

33

40

23

38

22

17.5

84

32

46

42

30

29

16

40

61

46

Max

174

156

170

154

163.5

48.5

195

48

60

33

50

35

23

94

48

56

56

46

43

29

57

86

64

S

5.33

4.26

4.61

4.83

5.68

3.52

6.92

2.69

3.32

2.36

2.09

2.51

1.19

3.08

3.18

2.37

2.96

3.96

2.66

2.76

3.39

6.14

3.68

V

3.47

2.91

2.97

3.38

3.87

5.06

4

6.99

6.13

8.7

4.69

8.06

6.08

3.39

8.08

4.59

6.06

10.61

6.91

12.32

7.11

8.34

6.81

1 – height at withers
2 – height at back
3 – height at croup
4 – height at tail base
5 – trunk oblique length
6 – chest depth

7 – chest circumference
8 – shoulder width
9 – shoulder length
10 – arm length
11 – forearm length
12 – frontshank length

13 – shank circumference
14 – leg length
15 – hindshank length
16 – croup length
17 – croup width
Distances: 18 – 23

18 – point of hip – joint of hip
19 – joint of hip – point of stifle
20 – joint of hip – point buttock
21 – point of hip – point of stifle
22 – joint of hip – hock joint
23 – point of stifle – joint of hip

Table 2. Statistic characteristics of body conformation indices of tested trotters

Indeks of body conformation

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

n

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

x

100.94

45.31

112.39

12.77

31.78

33.58

25.06

118.34

111.93

94.3

65.37

96.37

38.84

80.33

73.69

Min

97.07

41.45

105.75

11.06

27.27

29.63

21.82

108

103.15

85.53

59.74

90.48

33.78

60.7

63.75

Max

104.08

48.46

120.37

14.29

35.06

35.48

27.81

129.93

116.99

98.05

70.32

100

44.30

88.6

82.35

S

1.51

1.65

2.86

0.66

1.56

1.27

1.58

4.32

3.07

2.7

2.38

2.26

2.66

4.18

4.08

V

1.5

3.64

2.55

5.19

4.91

3.79

6.3

3.65

2.74

2.87

3.63

2.34

6.86

5.2

5.53

1 – restucturing
2 – chest depth
3 – chest girth
4 – bonines
5 – croup length

6 – croup width
7 – shoulder width
8 – eurysomia
9 – shoulder part length
10 – selected parts of fore limb

11 – croup size
12 – croup size 2
13 – combined croup length
14 – croup triangle
15 – hind limb length

An equally high degree of homogeneity was not stated in relation to the analysed parameters of movement capacity (Table 3) of the tested trotters. The main reason for that seems to be their introductory character and low degree of training advance. Nevertheless, in a vast majority of cases, V-values do not exceed 15% in relation to such parameters as :step length and its frequency as well as step index. Fairly considerable V-values were noted for movement velocity of the tested trotters, which can be explained by their training ability. Yet, in none of the cases do they reach 30%.

Table 3. Statistic characteristics of movement capacity parameters of tested trotter

Parameters of movement efficienty

Trot first

Trot secend

Trot third

Trot – Average

step length

step frequency

step index

speed

step length

step frequency

step index

speed

step length

step frequency

step index

speed

step length

step frequency

step index

speed

n

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

x

3.21

102.69

207.09

6.43

3.85

108.57

257.97

8.33

4.29

113.61

277.23

9.69

3.78

108.64

241.92

8.01

Min

2.12

84.51

138.56

3.07

2.76

90.68

182.78

4.51

2.84

85.86

188.39

3.77

2.79

93.45

182.15

3.78

Max

4.49

147.54

289.68

10.24

5.4

139.42

346.45

13.76

5.46

142.5

342.67

15

4.87

134.4

294.35

12.3

S

0.52

10.77

33.65

1.59

0.52

11.48

32.95

2.03

0.58

13.26

34.93

2.68

0.46

9.13

24.17

1.99

V

16.11

10.49

16.25

24.79

13.5

10.58

12.77

24.38

13.54

11.67

12.6

27.63

12.28

8.4

9.99

24.92

The analysis of relationship between biometric traits of trotters and their movement capacity points to frequent and repeated statistically significant positive links (Table 4). The greatest number of highly significant and significant correlations was found on analysing step length in all 3 trot types and a considerably smaller number related to other movement parameters and not to any trot type. The greatest number of statistically significant correlations pertained to the so-called “height biometric traits” (height at withers, back, crupper and tail head). In a slow trot they reached between 0.312* and 0.417**, in medium from 0.361** to 0.444** and fast from 0.349** to 0.445**. The average relationship value for the 3 trot types was between 0.378** and 0.498**. It should be noted that the height at tail head showed the most frequent and highest level of relationship with step length (slow trot 0.417**, medium 0.418**, fast 0.445**), step frequency (slow trot 0.345, average –0.278) and index(slow trot 0.288**, medium 0.363**, average 0.270*). The analysed tendency would indicate the fact that less sloping and more horizontal croups of young growing trotters influence have a greater impact on movement capacity parameters. Some variable relationships also occurred in the case of chest depth and step frequency in slow (–0.311*), medium (–0.282*) and average trot (–0.288*) as well as step legth in medium (0.287*), fast (0.274*) and average trot (0.306*). To a smaller degree, this also affected skew body length having a positive influence on step length in fast trot (0.307*).

Table 4. Coefficients of simple correlations between biometric measures of trotters and selected parameters of their movement capacity

Body
measurements
n

Parameters of movement efficienty

Trot first

Trot secend

Trot third

Trot – average

step length

step frequency

step index

speed

step length

step frequency

step index

speed

step length

step frequency

step index

speed

step length

step frequency

step index

speed

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

Height at withers

*
0.312

-0.225

0.119

0.088

**
0.404

-0.059

*
0.297

0.192

**
0.367

-0.032

0.032

0.074

**
0.423

-0.144

*
0.259

0.155

Height at back

*
0.258

0.159

0.063

0.058

**
0.361

-0.151

0.228

0.001

**
0.349

0.043

0.045

0.062

**
0.378

-0.12

0.178

0.07

Height at croup

*
0.348

*
0.285

0.186

0.008

**
0.444

*
-0.255

*
0.318

0.008

**
0.389

-0.127

0.087

-0.031

**
0.461

*
-0.291

0.206

0.005

Height at tail base

**
0.417

**
0.345

*
0.288

-0.205

**
0.418

-0.239

**
0.363

-0.057

**
0.445

-0.053

0.199

-0.097

**
0.498

*
-0.278

*
0.27

-0.127

Chest depth

0.222

*
-0.311

0.118

-0.037

*
0.287

*
-0.282

0.212

-0.209

*
0.274

-0.002

0.039

-0.029

*
0.306

*
-0.288

0.122

-0.103

Trunk oblique length

0.024

-0.01

-0.092

0.055

0.038

0.089

-0.009

0.228

*
0.307

-0.06

0.151

-0.025

0.14

0.014

0.218

0.113

Shoulder
length

0.09

-0.118

-0.052

-0.077

0.092

-0.006

-0.042

0.025

0.196

-0.087

0.012

-0.091

0.146

-0.11

-0.042

-0.042

Arm
length

0.095

-0.175

0.075

-0.108

0.112

0.03

0.126

0.061

0.219

-0.115

0.075

0.084

0.165

-0.116

0.07

0.023

Croup length

*
0.303

-0.217

0.123

-0.058

**
0.435

-0.184

**
0.338

-0.063

**
0.367

-0.052

0.178

-0.071

**
0.433

-0.217

0.219

-0.075

Cvroup width

0.147

-0.203

0.041

0.066

0.206

-0.17

0.112

-0.112

0.171

-0.139

-0.039

0.014

0.205

*
-0.281

0.11

-0.004

Shoulder width

0.125

-0.111

0.073

-0.011

*
0.329

-0.083

*
0.255

-0.04

0.092

-0.025

-0.074

-0.043

0.218

-0.117

0.034

-0.033

Leg length

0.04

-0.004

-0.052

*
0.28

-0.143

-0.03

-0.079

0.135

0.051

-0.078

-0.11

0.131

-0.025

-0.058

0.237

**
0.325

Forearm length

0.232

-0.106

0.225

*
0.25

0.027

-0.059

-0.032

-0.047

0.072

0.085

-0.005

0.205

0.126

-0.049

0.071

0.166

Fronthshank length

-0.004

-0.037

-0.008

-0.054

0.151

*
-0.313

0.09

*
-0.272

-0.195

-0.23

-0.213

*
-0.257

-0.013

*
-0.296

-0.152

*
-0.263

Hindshank
length

-0.03

0.013

-0.106

-0.028

-0.081

0.132

-0.079

0.135

-0.036

0.008

-0.164

0.07

-0.058

0.063

0.033

0.07

Shank
circumference

0.021

0.047

-0.12

0.03

-0.012

0.168

-0.127

0.178

0.205

0.046

0.059

0.079

0.08

0.151

0.088

0.135

Chest circumference

0.181

-0.031

0.003

0.135

0.197

0.029

0.115

0.112

**
0.370

-0.036

0.109

0.059

*
0.289

-0.035

0.197

0.13

Point of hip
of hipjoint

0.086

0.05

-0.016

0.11

0.055

0.16

0.037

*
0.267

**
0.388

-0.056

*
0.27

0.182

0.201

0.079

0.225

0.238

Joint of hip
point of stifle

**
-0.685

0.164

**
-0.709

**
0.424

**
-0.466

0.239

**
-0.445

**
0.49

**
-0.35

-0.15

**
-0.369

**
0.439

**
-0.583

0.13

-0.194

**
0.568

Joint of hip
point buttock

**
0.583

*
-0.323

**
0.568

**
-0.426

**
0.59

**
-0.408

**
0.513

**
-0.503

*
0.306

0.062

*
0.275

**
-0.376

**
0.579

*
-0.313

0.06

**
-0.533

Point of hip
point of stifle

-0.017

-0.075

-0.094

0.067

-0.094

0.166

-0.079

0.248

0.191

0.095

0.037

0.273

0.027

0.092

0.118

*
0.264

Joint of hip
hock joint

*
0.308

-0.24

*
0.312

-0.054

**
0.367

*
-0.32

*
0.327

*
-0.281

0.214

-0.102

0.168

-0.191

**
0.348

**
-0.326

0.164

-0.221

Point of stifle
joint of hip

0.018

-0.248

-0.106

-0.058

0.204

**
-0.351

0.163

-0.175

0.048

-0.233

-0.095

-0.083

0.109

**
-0.382

-0.06

-0.13

* significant at P≤0.05.
** significant at P≤0.01.

The croup conformation of young trotters is clearly related to their step length in all analysed cases, as it amounts to 0.303* in slow trot, 0.435** in medium trot and 0.367** in fast trot (0.433* combined). Croup width had a negative influence on step frequency in average trot (–0.281).

Measures such as shoulder width, chest girth, leg length, forearm length and foreshank length rarely showed a relationship with movement capacity of young trotters in different trot types; a highly significant level was only found for the correlation between leg length with average trot speed (0.325**) and chest girth with step length in fast trot (0.370**).

Very interesting tendencies were found on evaluating the relationship between measures of croup conformation and movement parameters in different trot types. The distance “hip joint – knee joint” (giving approximate length of thigh bone) is negatively highly significantly correlated with step length (slow trot – 0.685**, medium – 0.466**, fast – 0.350** and average – 0.583**) , and positive relationships are related to movement speed (slow trot 0.424**, medium 0.490**, fast 0.439**). Distance “hip joint – knee joint” also indicated a negative relationship with the step index in all trot types (slow – 0.709**, medium – 0.445, fast – 0.369). The other measure, significantly related to movement capacity parameters, is the distance “hip joint – point of buttock”, which positively influenced step length in slow (0.583**), medium (0.590**), fast (0.306) and average trot (0.579**). It influenced negatively movement velocity: in slow trot (–0.426**), medium (–0.503**) and fast (–0.376*) as well as average (–0.533**). The analysed distance also affected negatively movement velocity in slow (–0.323*), medium (–0.408*) and average trot (–0.313*). It had a positive influence on step index in slow trot (0.568**), medium (0.513**) and fast (0.275*). A slightly smaller number of relationships was found for the influence of the distance “hip joint – hock joint” on individual parameters of movement capacity of trotters. It was stated that the greatest number of relationships within this measure was related to parameters in medium trot – step length (0.367*), step index (0.327*), step frequency (–0.320*) and velocity (0.281*). A fewer number was established for slow trot (step length 0.308*), step index (0.312*), average trot (step length 0.348**) and step frequency (–0.326**).

The results of estimated relationship between body conformation indices and their parameters of movement capacity are presented in Table 5. Their greatest number was established in relation to the “croup triangle” index in which significant relationships were determined between the analysed parameter and step length in slow trot (–0.555**) and its index (–0.549*) and medium trot (0.491** and –0.421**, respectively). They appeared in the average results of all trot types, in relation to step length (–0.474**) and movement velocity (0.485**). The only highly significant relationship established for fast trot was movement velocity in the third trot (0.423*). Additional statistically significant correlation coefficients were given also in relation to the index of “selected parts of forelimb” and and step length in slow (0.280*), medium (–0.510*), fast (–0.248*) and average trot (0.410**).The third statistically significant correlation was the one between “cumulative croup length” with step length in fast trot (0.426**) and its index (0.372**) as well as step length in average trot (means of 3 measurements). Statistically significant relations were established with referrence to “shoulder part length”, step length in slow (–0.249*) and medium trot (–0.455**). This also pertained to restructuring indices and their significant connection with step frequency in medium trot (–0.382**) and movement velocity (–0.427**) as well as chest depth with the parameters mentioned before (step frequency – 0.344** and movement velocity – 0.483**). Individual statistically significant coefficients were found in relation to chest girth (0.309*) in slow trot and boniness index (–0.273*) in medium trot.

Table 5. Coefficients of simple correlations between body conformation indices and selected parameters of their movement capacity

Indeks of body conformation
n

Parameters of movement efficienty

Trot first

Trot secend

Trot third

Trot – average

step length

step frequency

step index

speed

step length

step frequency

step index

speed

step length

step frequency

step index

speed

step length

step frequency

step index

speed

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

60

Restucturing

-0.021

-0.035

0.108

-0.189

-0.034

**
-0.382

-0.018

**
-0.427

-0.062

-0.188

0.107

-0.232

-0.046

-0.261

-0.174

**
-0.351

Chest depth

0.018

-0.221

0.052

-0.136

0.024

**
-0.344

0.027

**
-0.483

0.035

0.033

0.02

-0.107

0.03

-0.26

-0.066

-0.299

Chest girth

-0.13

*
0.309

-0.151

0.094

-0.228

0.161

-0.198

-0.093

0.104

0.005

0.136

-0.006

-0.104

0.196

-0.026

-0.017

Boniness

-0.181

0.203

-0.2

-0.021

*
-0.273

0.242

-0.298

0.082

-0.017

0.084

0.045

0.051

-0.187

0.278

-0.053

0.057

Croup
width

-0.038

-0.007

0.007

-0.066

0.142

-0.079

0.121

-0.164

-0.102

-0.025

-0.105

-0.109

0.006

-0.069

-0.114

-0.141

Croup
length

0.089

-0.062

0.04

-0.177

0.172

-0.193

0.147

-0.288

0.123

-0.034

0.192

-0.167

0.151

-0.138

0.031

-0.269

Shoulder
width

-0.038

-0.007

0.007

-0.066

0.142

-0.079

0.121

-0.164

-0.102

-0.025

-0.105

-0.109

0.006

-0.069

-0.114

-0.141

Eury-
somia

0.194

-0.03

0.107

0.069

0.196

-0.055

0.14

-0.117

0.1

0.029

-0.039

0.071

0.192

-0.052

-0.013

0.004

Shoulder part length

*
-0.249

0.1

-0.17

-0.056

**
-0.455

0.08

-0.363

-0.005

-0.163

-0.119

-0.059

-0.014

-0.343

0.023

-0.176

-0.023

Selected parts of fore limb

*
-0.28

0.178

-0.219

0.023

**
-0.51

0.059

-0.442

-0.003

*
-0.248

-0.078

-0.109

-0.059

**
-0.41

0.067

-0.19

-0.011

Croup size

0.024

-0.094

0

-0.077

0.077

-0.26

0.043

**
-0.343

0.036

-0.122

0.051

-0.116

0.054

-0.24

-0.01

-0.225

Croup
size 2

-0.136

-0.047

-0.133

-0.053

-0.191

-0.062

-0.14

-0.188

0.044

-0.005

0.073

0.116

-0.114

-0.06

-0.01

-0.032

Combined croup length

0.11

0.095

0.025

0.10

0.191

0.078

0.12

0.082

** 0.436

0.112

** 0.372

0.182

*
0.288

0.105

0.135

0.207

Croup triangle

**
-0.555

0.204

**
-0.549

*
0.3

**
-0.491

*
0.307

**
-0.421

*
0.427

-0.163

-0.064

-0.142

**
0.423

**
-0.474

0.218

-0.065

**
0.485

Hind limb length

0.086

-0.093

0.176

-0.143

0.06

-0.198

0.103

**
-0.329

-0.053

-0.074

0.047

-0.195

0.037

-0.191

0.015

-0.288

* significant at P≤0.05.
** significant at P≤0.01.

It is impossible to compare directly the obtained results with those achieved by other authors due to the introductory character of the studies. The research carried out in foreign countries has a different character [1,12,13,16] since there are no studies availble in Poland on the connections between biometry of trotters and their performance.

CONCLUSIONS

However, this study aims at indicating tendencies which should possibly be confirmed in the following further research:


REFERENCES

  1. Arnason Th., 1996. Selection criterion for increased long-term response in Nordic-trotters. 47th Annual Meeting. EAAP, Lillehammer.

  2. Bocian K., 2003. Zootechniczna charakterystyka i ocena koni utrzymywanych w wybranych prywatnych osrodkach hodowli i eksploatacji [Zootechnical characteristics and evaluation of horses kept in selected private breeding and utiliztion centres]. Rocz. Nauk. Zootech., Supl., 18, 139-142 [in Polish].

  3. Byszewski W., 1999. Transformacja różnych ras koni w Polsce [Transformation of various breeds of horses in Poland]. Międzynarodowe Sympozjum Naukowe, Kraków, 9-17 [in Polish].

  4. Chachuła J., Bucholc-Ferenstein W., 1981. Polskie konie wierzchowe [Polish reading horses]. PWRiL.

  5. Kaproń M., 1999. Metody doskonalenia koni [Methods hors introvment]. WAR Lublin [in Polish].

  6. Kaproń M., Janczarek I., Grochowski W., Suska A., Marchel I., 2004. Próba opracowania nowych formuł indeksów służacych do oceny ruchowej wydolnosci ogierów półkrwi [Attempt aimed at developing new index formulas to evaluate movement capacity of half-bred stallions]. Prz. Hod. 72 (5), 107-118 [in Polish].

  7. Kaproń M., Janczarek I., Marchel I., Pluta M., Grochowski W., Suska A., 2004. Współzależnosc między wybranymi wymiarami zadu i kończyny tylnej ogierów półkrwi a ich wydolnoscia ruchowa [Correlation between the selected croup and hindlimb measurements of half-bred stallions and their movement capacity]. Prz. Hod. 72 (5), 93-102 [in Polish].

  8. Kaproń M., Janczarek I., Pluta J., 2000. Zależnosc między wskaznikami pokrojowymi a dzielnoscia wyscigowa koni [Relationship between parameters of body conformation and race brave performance of the race horses]. Prz. Hod. 50 (5), 107-118 [in Polish].

  9. Kaproń M., Janczarek I., Suska A., 2001. Wpływ wybranych czynników na zmiennosc tętna i parametry skoku koni przygotowywanych do skoków przez przeszkody [Effect of selected factors on the pulse rate of horses starting in jumping competitions]. Rocz. Nauk. Zootech., Supl. 14, 127-132 [in Polish].

  10. Kaproń M., Janczarek I., Suska A., Marchel I., 2005. Próba oceny współzależnosci między dwoma systemami bonitacji ogierów półkrwi a ich wybranymi wymiarami zoometrycznymi [Attempt at evaluating interrelation between two bonitation systems of half-blood stallions and their zoometric measures]. Rocz. Nauk. Zootech., (w druku) [in Polish].

  11. Kaproń M., Janczarek I., Sledz A., Bocian K., Kaproń B., 2003. Współzależnosc między wymiarami i indeksami budowy ciała ogierów półkrwi oraz ich wydolnoscia ruchowa, oceniana podczas testu 100 dni [Corelation between sizes and indices of body of half-bred stallions and their motorial efficiency evaluated in the 100-day test]. Rocz. Nauk. Zootech., Supl. 18, 143-146 [in Polish].

  12. Langlois B., 1983. Analyse statistique et génétique des temps de course des trotteurs français. 34e Réunion annuelle de la Fédération Européenne de Zootechnie, Madrid, Espagne, 3-6 Octobre.

  13. Magnusson L. E., 1985. Studies on the conformation and related traits of Standardbred trotters in Sweden. Thesis. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet.

  14. Popescu-Vifor S., Stanescu M., Marginean G., 1996. Studies concerning performance trots in romanian trotters. 47th Annual Meeting, EAAP, Lillehammer.

  15. Pruski W., 1960. Hodowla koni [Hors breeding], t. 1, 2, PWRiL [in Polish].

  16. Sasimowski E., 1959. Technika pomiarów biometrycznych koni [Technique of biometric measurements of horses]. Med. Weter. 15 (8), 530-534 [in Polish].


Marian Kaproń
Department of Horse Breeding and Use,
Agricultural University of Lublin, Poland
Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
email: marian.kapron@ar.lublin.pl

Iwona Janczarek
Department of Horse Breeding and Use,
Agricultural University of Lublin, Poland
Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

Anna Suska
Department of Horse Breeding and Use,
Podlaska University of Siedlce, Poland
Prusa 14, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland

Iwona Marchel
Department of Horse Breeding and Use,
Agricultural University of Lublin, Poland
Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

Responses to this article, comments are invited and should be submitted within three months of the publication of the article. If accepted for publication, they will be published in the chapter headed 'Discussions' and hyperlinked to the article.