Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities (EJPAU) founded by all Polish Agriculture Universities presents original papers and review articles relevant to all aspects of agricultural sciences. It is target for persons working both in science and industry,regulatory agencies or teaching in agricultural sector. Covered by IFIS Publishing (Food Science and Technology Abstracts), ELSEVIER Science - Food Science and Technology Program, CAS USA (Chemical Abstracts), CABI Publishing UK and ALPSP (Association of Learned and Professional Society Publisher - full membership). Presented in the Master List of Thomson ISI.
2004
Volume 7
Issue 2
Topic:
Animal Husbandry
ELECTRONIC
JOURNAL OF
POLISH
AGRICULTURAL
UNIVERSITIES
Jamroz D. , Wertelecki T. , Żyłka R. , Bodarski R. , Gajda-Janiak A. 2004. MECHANICAL, CHEMICAL AND SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS OF MINERALISATION RATE AS METHODS OF BONES QUALITY DETERMINATION IN BROILER CHICKENS, EJPAU 7(2), #04.
Available Online: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume7/issue2/animal/art-04.html

MECHANICAL, CHEMICAL AND SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS OF MINERALISATION RATE AS METHODS OF BONES QUALITY DETERMINATION IN BROILER CHICKENS

Dorota Jamroz, Tomasz Wertelecki, Roman Żyłka, Rafał Bodarski, Agnieszka Gajda-Janiak

 

ABSTRACT

Different method for bone quality assay: bone strength and elasticity, fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for estimation of mineral/organic matrix ratio and chemical composition of ash in bones of chickens, were used. Values of estimated indices are in clearly relation to kind of bones. In young chickens, the strength and elasticity parameters were significant lower in femur as in tibia. Presented results of mineral/organic matrix ratio and Ca-content in ash of bones stand in negative relation to elasticity (r2 = -0.72; -0.69) and in young broiler chickens measurements of mechanical parameters are for bone quality a informative characteristic.

Key words: bone, quality, strength, elasticity.

INTRODUCTION

The increased frequency of leg disorders in the intensive rearing of chickens is the one of essential problems in broiler production [1,2,6,7,12,18,19]. The locomotion ability of chickens depends not only from good functioning muscles but also from mechanical and chemical properties of bones, especially from mineral/organic matrix ratio. This remains mainly in relation to calcium, but to phosphorus status of animals organism, too. In numerous studies was demonstrated, that the effectivity of phosphorus metabolism can be measured through phosphorus retention or bone quality parameters [8,9,10,11,14,15,17]. The source of phosphorus in feed mixtures and supplementation with microbial phytase of diets rich in domestical grains and other plant compounds containing phytate-phosphorus influenced the P-utilization and bone quality [3,5,11,13,15,20,21].

The objective of the presented investigations was to determine of bone quality of broiler chickens fed mixtures contained two kinds of phosphorus sources: mono- (MCP) or dicalcium phosphates (DCP) composed with grains: wheat, barley and maize. The mechanical, chemical and infrared spectroscopy methods of determination of bone quality parameters, ratio between organic matrix and mineral ingredients in bones, and Ca, P, Mg retention in chickens were estimated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and environment

The experiment was performed on 100 Hubbard HI-Ye broiler chickens (♂) with average initial body weight 42.5 g, kept in battery cages. Day-old chickens were randomly divided into two groups, each comprised of 12 replicates (cages) with 4 or 5 birds. The temperature in the room was initially 29-31°C and was gradually reduced to 21°C. The lighting program was 24 hours light for the first 10 days, later 19 hours light and 5 hours darkness. The birds had free access to drinking water (nyple system).

Chickens were fed mixtures in mash form: starter in period 1-14 days and grower in days 15-32 with average protein content 219/203 g · kg-1 and energy (ME) density 12.5 and 13.1 MJ kg-1 (2 987.5 kcal and 3 130.9 kcal·kg-1) respectively (Table 1). Mixtures were diversified in content of two phosphates: group I (monocalcium phosphate MCP) or group II (dicalcium phosphate DCP). Diets were fed ad libitum.

Table 1. Composition of diets (g · kg-1)

Compounds

Starter mixture

Grower mixture

Monocalcium
phosphate
MCP

Dicalcium phosphate
DCP

Monocalcium
phosphate
MCP

Dicalcium phosphate
DCP

I

II

I

II

Maize
Barley
Wheat
Soyabean meal
Soya oil
Premix DKA*
Salt

100
100
350
335
60
10
3

110
120
340
295
80
10
3

Limestone
Monocalcium phosphate Ca 21.0%; P 22.7%
Dicalcium phosphate 23.5%; P 18.0%
L-Lysine HCl/DL-Methionine/L-Threonine

16
17
 
-
9

12
-
 
21
9

16
17
 
-
9

12.5
-
 
20
9.5

Crude protein (N x 6.25)**
ME N, MJ kg-1
Lysine
Methionine + Cystine
Tryptophan
Threonine

219.5
12.5 
13.0
9.3
2.6
8.0

202.7
13.1 
12.0
9.5
2.4
8.1

Ca
P
P available***
Mg

9.6
7.2
4.3
1.8

9.3
7.8
4.2
1.8

9.4
6.9
4.0
1.7

9.3
7.5
4.0
1.7

*Supplied per kg starter diet premix content: retinol acetate 1 200 000 IU; cholekalciferol 300 000 IU; tocopherol 3 500 mg; menadion 250 mg; thiamine 300 mg; riboflavin 700 mg; pyridoxine 500 mg; cyanocobalamin 2 mg; biothine15 mg; folic acid 150 mg; nicotinic acid 4000 mg; panthothenic acid 1 400 mg; choline chloride 60 000 mg; Mn 7 000 mg; Zn 6 000 mg; Cu 1500 mg; Fe7 000 mg; I 100 mg; Se 20 mg; Co 30 mg; Mg 2 000 mg; Diclazuril 100 mg.
*Supplied per kg grower diet premix content: retinol acetate 1000000 IU; cholekalciferol 200000 IU; tocopherol 3000 mg; menadion 200 mg; thiamine 200 mg; riboflavin 500 mg; pyridoxine 350 mg; cyanocobalamin 1.5 mg; biothine15 mg; folic acid 100 mg; nicotinic acid 3000 mg; panthothenic acid 1000 mg; choline chloride 50000 mg; Mn 6000 mg; Zn 5000 mg; Cu 1500 mg; Fe 5000 mg; I 100 mg; Se 20 mg; Co 20 mg; Mg 2000 mg; Diclazuril 100 mg.
** Content of crude protein and amino acids was calculated on basic of estimated nutrients in single compounds of mixtures.
*** Calculated on the basis of P-availability from Nutrient Requirements (1996)
Nutrition value of experimental feeds were calculated according to Hubbard ISA Poland recommendations (2002).

In experiment chickens were weighed in days 1, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 32; daily feed intake was in period of balance trial registered. In days 28-32 were calcium, phosphorus and magnesium balances performed. The collection period was five days, in them the both feed intake and quantity of excrements were recorded.

At day 32nd the 20 chickens per each group were killed and from their both legs the muscles were removed, bones were cleaned, and stored for estimation of bone quality parameters (20 left legs). In bones from the each right leg of 10 chickens the chemical composition (content of ash, Ca, P, Mg) was estimated.

Analytical methods

The chemical composition of compounds of diets and excrements were determined according to standard methods (AOAC, 1990). Phosphorus content in diets and bones was analysed after previous mineralization by the ammonium vanadomolybdate method using a Specol 11 Carl Zeiss Jena spectrophotometer at a wave length of 470 nm. Calcium and magnesium in diets, bones and excrements were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry using ASS-3 EA-30 type apparatus Carl Zeiss Jena.

Bone strength parameters - mechanical properties

Two different analytical estimations of mechanical bone properties were used: perpendicular to the bone axis (estimation A) and parallel to the bone length axis (estimation B). The measurements were done on fresh bones that had been stored in a refrigerator at a temperature of 4-5°C. Mechanical performed measurements were taken in the Institute of Agricultural Engineering of Agricultural University, Wrocław on INSTRON instrument [11].

In the first method (A), bone deflection h was measured by a standard method, in which the force F was applied to the shaft of the bone supported at both epiphyses at 25 mm distance (Fig.1). Force F was variable up to the bone breaking point. Similarly in the second method, the elasticity coefficient αn= F/h was calculated. After mechanical test, the bones were cut in the breaking place and the cut surface were scanned. Then the cut surface area and the surface moment of inertia were measured. On the basis of the data obtained, the Young's Modulus was calculated from the equation:

En = αn · L3

where:
L - supported distance (25 mm),
ω - cut surface moment of inertia.

Fig. 1. Model of strength bones analysis
Estimation A Estimation B

On the basis of the data obtained at the mechanical test were also calculated: maximal loading force Fn (strength at breaking point), maximal bone deflection hn (deflection at breaking point), maximal percent bone deflection Un = hn / L and the energy at the breaking point Wn = ∫Fdh (from zero deflection to breaking point).

In the second method (B), 8 mm length of the bone central shaft was taken. A force F variable up on to the value of l kN was put perpendicular to the cut surface (Fig.1), and length deformation x (=h) was measured. Hook's law concerning elasticity, where the deformation vector is proportional to the force applied, the elasticity coefficient α1 = F/x was calculated. After mechanical test the cut surface was scanned and the cut surface area measured using an own program. On the basis of the data obtained, the Young's Modulus was calculated from the equation:

E1 = α1 · l/S

where:
l - length of cut (8 mm),
S - cut surface area.

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)

For FTIR, fresh bones dissected from the right legs of 10 chickens per group were defatted by standard method dried for 24 h in 50°C and then pulverized to fine powder in room temperature. Next, fine powder was lyophilised in vacuum for 24 h. and mixed with salt KBr to total weight of sample 3 mg (3-5% of bones powder) and pressed to tablet form for spectrometer analyses. The infrared spectra were recorded in the FTIR Mattson IR 300 spectrometer, according to FTIR standards, where peak positions near 1 030 cm-1 and near 1 650 cm-1 were assigned to the phosphate stretching vibration of links P-O in PO4 (hydroxyapatite - mineral matrix) and the amide 1 (Amide 1 – collagen specimen) stretching vibration of the bone organic matrix [4, 16].

The mineral/organic matrix ratio was calculated from the ratio of absorbency (in the vibration intensity units) of the phosphate links at 1 030 cm-1 to the amide 1 links at 1 650 cm-1 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. The infrared spectra of phosphate links at 1 030 cm-1 and amide 1 links at 1 650 cm-1

Experimental data were evaluated statistically by one- or two factorial analysis of variance using SAS® procedures. Differences between treatment means were tested according to Duncan's multiple range test (Duncan, 1955).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The growth and development of chicken was in period of 21st day of life in both group similar (Table 2).

The calcium retention in chickens (Table 3) fed diet contained MCP was higher (75.3%) in comparison with DCP-groups, was only 65% of consumed Ca (p<0.01). High P-retention (54%) was stated in DCP-group and in MCP-group was lower, about 42.7% (p<0.01). Similar, higher Mg utilization was determined in chickens from DCP- group (40.3%) however significant lower (35%) was the magnesium retention in MCP group (p<0.05).

Table 2. Body weight and metabolic body weight (BW 0.67) of chickens (n of group = 50)

Days of life

I - MCP

II - DCP

SEM

Absolute body weight
1
7
14
21
28
32

 
42.9
126.4
334.1
680.9
1 135.1
1 495.7

 
42.9
125.6
332.5
677.5
1 118.1
1 470.0

 
0.56
2.93
6.04
5.69
2 3.69
49.71

Metabolic body weight
1
7
14
21
28
32

 
12.4
25.6
49.1
79.1
111.4
134.0

 
12.4
25.5
48.9
78.8
110.2
132.4

 
0.14
0.42
0.60
0.42
1.52
2.97

Table 3. Balance of mineral compounds in chickens (n of group = 50)

Specification

I - MCP

II - DCP

SEM

Total feed intake in balance period, g per head

600.0

590.0

9.97

Balance of elements

-Ca
Intake per head (g)
Excretion per head (g)
Retention per head (g)
Retention in % of intake

-P total
Intake per head (g)
Excretion per head (g)
Retention per head (g)
Retention in % of intake

-Mg
Intake per head (g)
Excretion per head (g)
Retention per head (g)
Retention in % of intake

 
 

5.64
1.39
4.25 a
75.35 A
 
 
4.14
2.37
1.77 a
42.75 A
 
 
1.02
0.66
0.36
35.09 a

 
 

5.48
1.93
3.55 b
64.78 B
 
 
4.42
2.05
2.37 b
53.71 B
 
 
1.00
0.60
0.40
40.27 b

 
 

0.38
0.27
0.33
3.16
 
 
0.21
0.08
0.26
1.36
 
 
0.05
0.02
0.12
4.15

Differences designed with A, B significant by p<0.01, designed with a, b significant by p<0.05.

The parameters characterized the leg bones strength and elasticity were similar in chickens from both groups (Table 4). The strength of tibia in chickens from MCP-groups was 215.6 N, for DCP - 211.1 N; the elasticity 2.29 and 2.38 x 105 Nm-1, respectively. Differences between groups in Young Modulus (Nm-2) were small, only the deflection of tibia between chickens from both groups was significantly different.

Table 4. Metrically and physically parameters of tibia and femur bones in chickens at 32 day of life calculated to 100g of BW 0.67 (n of group = 20) and the mineral/organic matrix ratio in tibia and femur bones estimating according to fourier transform infrared spectroscopy method (n of group = 10)

Specification

I - MCP

II - DCP

SEM

ESTIMATION A
Tibia:
- weight of dried bone (g)
- length of bone (cm)
- strength in max. force (N)
- elasticity (Nm-1)
- deflection (%)
- break energy (J)
- surface of cross-section (mm2)
- Young Modulus (Nm-2)

 
 
4.46
6.40
215.63
2.29 x 105
4.39a
1.88 x 10-1
3.48 x 101
8.36 x 109

 
 
4.47
6.99
211.05
2.38 x 105
3.95b
1.55 x 10-1
3.50 x 101
8.88 x 109

 
 
0.16
0.34
18.51
9.19 x 103
0.33
3.11 x 10-2
1.17
1.56 x108

Femur:
- weight of dried bone (g)
- length of bone (cm)
- strength in max. force (N)
- elasticity (Nm-1)
- deflection (%)
- break energy (J)
- surface of cross-section (mm2)
- Young Modulus (Nm-2)

 
3.18
4.56
142.44a
1.37 x 105
4.86
1.35 x 10-1
3.02 x 101
3.15 x 109 A

 
3.11
4.93
136.75b
53 x 105
4.25
1.17 x 10-1
2.85 x 101
4.28 x 109 B

 
0.08
0.28
5.88
1.4 x 103
0.42
0.84 x 10-2
0.78
3.11x108

ESTIMATION B
Tibia:
- elasticity (Nm-1)
- Young Modulus (Nm-2)

 
 
3.48 x 106
8.73 x 108a

 
 
3.57 x 106
9.25 x 108b

 
 
2.19 x 105
7.18 x 107

Femur:
- elasticity (Nm-1)
- Young Modulus (Nm-2)

 
3.14 x 106
6.64 x 108a

 
3.19 x 106
7.14 x 108b

 
1.45 x 105
5.97 x 107

FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY
Tibia - ratio mineral/organic matrix
Femur - ratio mineral/organic matrix

 
 
1.48
1.74 a

 
 
1.57
1.59 b

 
 
0.09
0.04

Differences designed with A, B significant by p<0.01, designed with a, b significant by p<0.05.

The differences in main bone quality parameters, totally lower in femur characteristic, were not similar in groups as for tibia. The greatest differences, however not significant, were observed in femur elasticity (1.37 for MCP and 1.53 x 105 Nm-1 for DCP). Significant better Young’s Modulus (p<0.05) parameters were estimated in bones from DCP – chickens (Table 4).

The Young Modulus measured at the bone length (Estimation B) was influenced from kind of used phosphate and was lower for femur as for tibia bones (p<0.05) and significant higher in DCP – group (p<0.05). The mineral/organic matrix ratio was significant (p<0.05) lower only in chickens fed diets with DCP (Table 4).

Two-factor analyse of variance of mainly physical parameters of bones confirm the significant (p<0.05 and p<0.01) differences between tibia and femur quality. All parameters: strength, elasticity, break energy, Young Modulus were significantly (p<0.01) lower in femur. Also better quality of bones was stated in chickens fed with MCP in the diet (Table 4a).

Table 4a. Two factor analyses of some physical parameters of bones

Specification

Bones

Phosphates

Tibia

Femur

MCP

DCP

Strength (N)
Elasticity (Nm-1)
Break energy (J)
Young Modulus (Nm-2)

213.3 A
2.34 x 105 a
1.72 x 10-1 a
8.63 x 109 A

139.6 B
1.45 x 105 b
1.27 x 10-1 b
3.72 x 109 B

179.0
1.83 x 105
1.62 x 10-1 a
5.76 x 109 a

173.9
1.96 x 105
1.37 x 10-1 b
6.58 x 109 b

Differences designed with A, B significant by p<0.01, designed with a, b significant by p<0.05.

The kind of used phosphates remained without evidently influence on chemical composition of crude ash and content of organic matter in bones (Table 5). Only very small differences in Ca, P, Mg level in ash of tibia or femur were stated.

The mineral/organic matrix ratio of femur bone has corresponded with mechanical parameters of bones like strength, deflection and energy break (estimation A). The higher mineral/organic matrix ratio pointed on higher strength of break and on the other side lower elasticity of bone.

Table 5. Chemical composition of dried, fat-free tibia and femur bones (n of group = 20)

Specification

I - MCP

II - DCP

SEM

TIBIA
Weight (g)
Ash content bone (g)
Organic matter content (g)

 
5.83
2.04
3.78

 
5.95
2.11
3.83

 
0.25
0.08
0.17

Content in ash (g kg-1):
Ca
P
Mg

 
216.43
172.50
7.97

 
217.72
173.87
7.33

 
3.43
0.66
0.33

Ca:P ratio

1.25

1.25

0.02

FEMUR
Weight (g)
Ash content bone (g)
Organic matter content (g)

 
4.17
1.30
2.86

 
4.15
1.30
2.84

 
0.15
0.03
0.11

Content in ash (g kg-1):
Ca
P
Mg

 
216.18
172.81
7.84

 
214.71
174.09
7.30

 
3.32
1.36
0.11

Ca:P ratio

1.25

1.23

0.03

Calculated correlations coefficients for some important indices shown, that Ca-content in bones is negatively correlated to elasticity of bones (p<0.05) and the kind of used phosphates has not clearly changed the correlations coefficients (Table 6).

Table 6. Correlation coefficients between important parameters of bones and Ca and P content in ash

Specification

I - MCP

II - DCP

ESTIMATION
A

ESTIMATION
B

ESTIMATION
A

ESTIMATION
B

 
TIBIA
Elasticity
Young’s Modulus

Ca

P

Ca

P

Ca

P

Ca

P

 
0.55
0.58

 
0.11
0.22

 
-0.72*
0.47

 
-0.16
-0.26

 
0.60
0.42

 
0.16
0.29

 
-0.69*
0.46

 
-0.17
-0.18

 
FEMUR
Elasticity
Young’s Modulus

Ca

P

Ca

P

Ca

P

Ca

P

 
0.38
0.49

 
0.19
0.27

 
-0.54
0.41

 
-0.25
-0.23

 
0.36
0.46

 
0.32
0.28

 
-0.49
0.28

 
-0.31
-0.32

* Significant correlation coefficient.

In present studies the different method for bone quality assay were used. The balance of macro elements in organism of chickens, bone strength and elasticity parameters as a picture of mineralisation processes in bones, fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for estimation of mineral/organic matrix ratio and chemical composition of ash in bones were determined.

The response of young chickens on different phosphate kinds in diets was visible only in some estimated parameters, only. Better retention of phosphorus and magnesium was stated by using of DCP in diets and this results are in contrary with observations of another authors [3,17]. However the better calcium retention was observed in chickens fed diets contained MCP supplement and this result was in agreement with other publications [3,17].Values of estimated indices are in clearly relation to kind of bones. In young chickens, the strength and elasticity parameters were significant lower in femur as in tibia. Contrary to this results in layer hens strength parameters of tibia are significant lower as of femur [11] and the breaking incidences of tibia are in layer keeping an important problem. And the kind of phosphates – sources of Ca and P play a significant role in mechanical properties of bones. Non await stabile was the chemical composition of bone ash, without influence of calcium-phosph ate kind. Presented results of mineral/organic matrix ratio and Ca-content in ash of bones stand in negative relation to elasticity (r2 = -0.72; -0.69). However in layers the bone ash composition is a good information of bone quality, in young broiler chickens measurements of mechanical parameters are for broiler bone quality more an informative characteristic.

CONCLUSIONS

The mineral/organic ratio and Ca-content in the ash of bones stand in negative relation to elasticity of bones. Those parameters may be a informative characteristic of bone quality.

 

Research project number GW105/2002 Agricultural University of Wrocław, Poland

REFERENCES

  1. Bain S.D., Watkins B.A., 1993. Local modulation of skeletal growth and bone modeling in poultry. J. Nutrition. 123 (2, II), 317-322.

  2. Bieńko M., Radzik R.P, Puzio J., Szymańczuk S.E., Valverde Piedra J.L., 2001. Wstępne badania nad wpływem fosforylowanych glukopeptydów na wła¶ciwo¶ci mechaniczne ko¶ci kończyn kurcz±t; brojlerów [Introductory research on the effect of phosphorylated glucopeptidies on mechanical properties of broiler chickens bones]. Prz. Hod. 2, 35-38.

  3. Bleux W., Engellandt T., Zwart J., 2002. The phosphorus digestibility of 3 feed phosphates for broilers. Proceed. 7.Tagung Schweine - und Geflügelernährung, 207-209.

  4. Cassella J.P., Barrie P.J., Garrington N., Ali S.Y., 2000. A fourier transform infrared spectroscopic and solid-state NMR study of bone mineral in osteogenesis imperfecta. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 18, 291-296.

  5. Edwards H.M., Jr., 1985. Observations on several factors influencing the incidence of tibial dyschondroplasia in broiler chickens. Poultry Sci. 64, 2325-2334.

  6. Edwards H.M., Jr.,1988. The effect of dietary calcium, phosphorus, chloride and zeolite on the development of tibial dyschondroplasia. Poultry Sci. 67, 1436-1446.

  7. Edwards H.M., Jr., 1992. Nutritional factors and leg disorders. In Bone Biology and Skeletal Disorders in Poultry. 23rd Poultry Sci. Symp., Edinburgh, Scotland, Chapter 10, 167-193.

  8. Huyghebaert G., 1996. Effects of dietary calcium, phosphorus, Ca/P-ratio and phytase on zootechnical performances and mineralisation in broiler chicks. Arch. Geflügelk. 61, 2, 53-61.

  9. Jamroz D., Wiliczkiewicz A., Orda J., Skorupińska J., 1996. Parameter des Verdauungstrakts und der N-und P-Verwertung bei Broiler, Enten und Gänse bei Verfütterung verschiedener Getreidearten (Teil III). Wien. Tierärztl. Mschr. 83, 6, 165-177.

  10. Jamroz D., Orda J., Wiliczkiewicz A., Skorupińska J., 1998. Stickstoff und Phosphorv-erwertung wie auch Verdaulichkeit der Aminosäuren bei Verfütterung von Triticale und Enzymen an Hähnchen, Enten und Gänse J. Anim. Physiol, Anim. Nutr. 79, 3-4, 123-134.

  11. Jamroz D., Orda J., Skorupińska J., Wertelecki T., Żyłka R., Klünter A.M., 2002. Reaction of laying hens to low phosphorus diets and addition of different phytase preparations. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 12, 97-112.

  12. Julian R. J., 1998. Rapid growth problems: ascites and skeletal deformities in broilers. Poultry Sci. 77, 1773-1780.

  13. Keshavarz K., 2000. Reevaluation of nonphytate phosphorus requirement of growing pullets with and without phytase. Poultry Sci. 79, 1143-1153.

  14. Leterrier C., Nys J., 1992. Composition, cortical structure and mechanical properities of chicken tibiotarsi: effect of growth rate. Br. Poultry Sci. 33, 925-939.

  15. Li Y.C., Ledoux D.R., Veum T.L., Raboy V., Żyła K., 2001. Low phytic acid barley improves performance bone mineralisation and phosphorus retention in turkey poults. J. Appl. Poultry Res. 10, 178-185.

  16. Magne D., Pilet P., Weiss P., Daculsi G., 2001. Fourier Transform Infrared Microspe-ctroscopic Investigation of the Maturation of Nonstoichiometric Apatites in Mineralized Tissues: A Horse Dentin Study. Bone, 29, 6, 547-752.

  17. Miles D.M., Sistani K.R., 2002. Broiler phosphorus intake versus broiler phosphorus output in the United States: nutrition or science. World's Poultry Sci. J. 58, 493-500.

  18. Robinson R.E., Classen H.L., Hansen J.A., Onderka D.K., 1992. Growth performance, feed efficiency and the incidence of skeletal and metabolic disease in full-fed and restricted broiler and roaster chickens. J. Appl. Poultry Res. 1, 33-41.

  19. Sanotra G.S., Lund J.D., Ersøll A.K., Petersen J.S., Vestergaard K.S., 2001. Monitoring leg problems in broilers a survey of commercial broiler production in Denmark. World's Poultry Sci. J. 57, 55-69.

  20. Sukira H.A., Lieber F., 2002. Influence of citric acid, microbial phytase and hydrothermal treatments on protein, phosphorus - and energy utilisation of chicken diets. Proceed. 7. Tagung Schweine - und Geflügelernährung, 198-200.

  21. Wendt R., Timmler R., Rodehutscord M., 2002. Availability of inorganic phosphorus sources to pekin ducks. Proceed. 7. Tagung Schweine - und Geflügelernährung, 204-206.


Dorota Jamroz , Tomasz Wertelecki , Rafał Bodarski , Agnieszka Gajda-Janiak
Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Quality
Agricultural University of Wrocław
Chełmońskiego 38D, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland

Roman Żyłka
Department of Biophysics
Agricultural University of Wrocław
Norwida 25/27, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland


Responses to this article, comments are invited and should be submitted within three months of the publication of the article. If accepted for publication, they will be published in the chapter headed ‘Discussions’ in each series and hyperlinked to the article.


[BACK] [MAIN] [HOW TO SUBMIT] [SUBSCRIPTION] [ISSUES] [SEARCH]