Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities (EJPAU) founded by all Polish Agriculture Universities presents original papers and review articles relevant to all aspects of agricultural sciences. It is target for persons working both in science and industry,regulatory agencies or teaching in agricultural sector. Covered by IFIS Publishing (Food Science and Technology Abstracts), ELSEVIER Science - Food Science and Technology Program, CAS USA (Chemical Abstracts), CABI Publishing UK and ALPSP (Association of Learned and Professional Society Publisher - full membership). Presented in the Master List of Thomson ISI.
2003
Volume 6
Issue 1
Topic:
Horticulture
ELECTRONIC
JOURNAL OF
POLISH
AGRICULTURAL
UNIVERSITIES
Kowalski R. , Wolski T. 2003. EVALUATION OF PHENOLIC ACID CONTENT IN Silphium perfoliatum L. LEAVES, INFLORESCENCES AND RHIZOMES, EJPAU 6(1), #03.
Available Online: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume6/issue1/horticulture/art-03.html

EVALUATION OF PHENOLIC ACID CONTENT IN SILPHIUM PERFOLIATUM L. LEAVES, INFLORESCENCES AND RHIZOMES

Radosław Kowalski, Tadeusz Wolski

 

ABSTRACT

Qualitative and quantitative chromatographic analysis (HPLC) of phenolic acids fraction (free phenolic acids and released after acid and alkaline hydrolysis) extracted from leaves, inflorescences and rhizomes of Silphium perfoliatum L. collected in 2000 was presented in paper.

Key words: Silphium L., Silphium perfoliatum L., phenolic acids, hydroxycinnamic acids, hydroxybenzoic acids, HPLC.

INTRODUCTION

Asteraceae family (Compositae) belongs to the largest plant’s families among all angiospermous of about 25 thousand species (about 250 species in Polish flora) [22]. Common cultivation plants (oil, fodder), vegetables, medical, ornamental plants and weeds are among them. Moreover, many plants of Asteraceae family are poorly known, including species of Silphium L. genus occurring in middle and eastern part of USA and Canada, in floristic provinces of prairie and Appalachian Mountains [19]. As it follows from the latest reports, Silphium L. genus, particularly Silphium perfoliatum L. species, is current object of many scientific investigations [9, 11, 12]. Interests upon this plant are associated with its meliferous, fodder, medical and ornamental properties. Authors of present paper have carried out anatomic, morphologic, cultivation and phytochemical studies for five years. They have also undertaken the attempt to evaluate the biological activity of ex tracts achieved from different organs of Silphium perfoliatum L. [15-17, 24, 25, 27-30].

At present, new cultivation plants that could be utilized by human for various purposes as alternative plants are searched for. Possibility to use Silphium perfoliatum L. as a species supplying raw material for herbal industry seems to be particularly interesting. It is worth mentioning that North-American Indian tribes applied various organs of Silphium perfoliatum L. for medical purposes [13]. Hitherto studies performed upon biological activity of ethanol extracts from Silphium perfoliatum L. showed their regenerative action during post-scald wounds healing at rats [18]. Anti-cholesterol action of saponozydes isolated from Silphium perfoliatum L. leaves (so-called “silphiozydes”) was found as well. Cholesterol concentration in rat’s blood decreased by 12% and 19% depending on a dose and the time course of experiment [21]. Moreover, Davidjanc et al. [10] found that saponins from Silphium perfoliatum L. leaves inhibited the development of phyto pathogenic fungi Drechslera Graminea (Rabh) Ito, Rhizopus nodosus Namysl and Rhizopus nigricans Ehr.

Due to the lack of wider and systematic studies upon the phytochemical composition of Silphium perfoliatum L., corresponding investigations were undertaken. Qualitative and quantitative HPLC analyses of phenolic acids fraction occurring in Silphium perfoliatum L. were presented in paper.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Leaves, inflorescences and rhizomes of Silphium perfoliatum L. from experimental cultivation of Department of Vegetable and Medical Plants, University of Agriculture, Lublin, were material for study. Leaves and inflorescences were collected in July 2000, and rhizomes in October 2000. They were dried in shadow and air and then grinded.

Isolation and purification of phenolic acids was made according to the method worked out on a basis of literature data [14, 20, 23] and the scheme of procedures is presented on figure 1.

Particular fractions of FPA, AH and BH were dissolved in 10 cm3 of methanol and then analyzed by means of HPLC technique.

Figure 1. Scheme of procedures at isolation and separation of phenolic acids from leaves, inflorescences and rhizomes of Silphium perfoliatum L.

Qualitative and quantitative HPLC analysis was performed in reversed phase system applying liquid chromatograph of LaChrom-Merck type equipped with DAD detector (L-7450), pump (l-7100), degasifier (L-7612), 20 µl dosing loop, thermostat (L-7360), Rheodyne injector, and a LiChrospher 100 RP-C18 column of (250×4 mm) filled with a stationary phase of 5 µm diameter. Analysis was performed at 25°C. As a mobile phase methanol + water (25:75, v/v) with 1% addition (v/v) acetic acid addition was used. Flow rate was 0.8 cm3/min. Phenolic acid identification was performed comparing their retention times (tr) with these for standards and spectroscopically determining their spectra in UV (220-400 nm). Contents of particular phenolic acids in raw material were calculated on a base of calibration curves plotted as dependence of area surface under peaks for standard phenolic acids (methanol solutions) on their concentration in a range: 0.5-2.5 mg/100 cm3.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Results of HPLC analyses referring to isolated phenolic acids fraction occurring in Silphium perfoliatum L. rhizomes are presented on figure 2. Figure 3 presents spectra making possible to identify studied compounds occurring in leaves, inflorescences and rhizomes of Silphium perfoliatum L. Numerical data referring to the amount of phenolic acids in particular fractions (FPA, AH, BH) achieved from leaves, inflorescences and rhizomes are listed in table 1.

Figure 2. HPLC chromatograms of phenolic acids fraction released from Silphium perfoliatum L. rhizomes: FPA – free phenolic acids, AH – phenolic acids releasing after acid hydrolysis, BH – phenolic acids releasing after alkaline hydrolysis; Phenolic acids: A – caffeic, B – p-coumaric, C – ferulic, D – protocatechuic, E – p-hydroxybenzoic

Figure 3. UV spectra (220-400 nm) of standard phenolic acids (WZ) and isolated from Silphium perfoliatum L. (PR): Phenolic acids: A – caffeic, B – p-coumaric, C – ferulic, D – protocatechuic, E – p-hydroxybenzoic, F – vanilic, G – chlorogenic

Table 1. Contents of phenolic acids contained in leaves, inflorescences and rhizomes from Silphium perfoliatum L. determined using HPLC technique

Phenolic acids

Amounts of phenolic acids (mg× 100 g-1 DM)

LEAVES

INFLORESCENCES

RHIZOMES

FPA

AH

BH

S

FPA

AH

BH

S

FPA

AH

BH

S

X* HYDROXYCYNNAMIC ACIDS

A. Caffeic

2.196

0.176

12.868

15.240

2.566

0.304

13.220

16.090

4.206

1.057

12.666

17.929

B. p-Coumaric

0.351

-

1.010

1.361

0.087

-

0.174

0.261

0.476

-

-

0.476

C. Ferulic

-

-

-

-

0.326

-

0.130

0.456

0.190

-

-

0.190

S X*

2.547

0.176

13.878

16.601

2.979

0.304

13.524

16.807

4.872

1.057

12.666

18.595

Y*HYDROXYBENZOIC ACIDS

D. Protocatechuic

1.537

0.439

0.527

2.503

2.131

0.826

0.913

3.870

0.147

0.052

0.052

0.251

E. p-Hydroxybenzoic

0.834

-

-

0.834

1.348

0.174

0.174

1.696

0.140

-

-

0.140

F. Vanilic

0.768

-

-

0.768

1.218

0.130

-

1.348

-

-

-

-

S Y*

3.139

0.439

0.527

4.105

4.697

1.130

1.087

6.914

0.287

0.052

0.052

0.391

Z* DEPSIDES

G. Chlorogenic

-

0.176

-

0.176

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

S Z*

-

0.176

-

0.176

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

S (X* + Y* + Z*)

5.686

0.791

14.405

20.882

7.676

1.434

14.611

23.721

5.159

1.109

12.718

18.986

FPA – free phenolic acids,
AH – phenolic acids releasing after acid hydrolysis,
BH – phenolic acids releasing after alkaline hydrolysis,
“-” – absent.

As it follows from table 1, fraction of FPA from leaves contained 5 phenolic acids; presence of 3 phenolic acids was found in AH and BH fractions. All leaf fractions contained 20.882 mg of phenolic acids in 100 g of dry matter, on average. Caffeic acid was dominant in studied material (15.240 mg·100 g-1 DM).

Fraction of FPA isolated from inflorescences of Silphium perfoliatum L. contained 6 phenolic acids. After acid hydrolysis (AH), presence of 4 phenolic acids and after alkaline hydrolysis (BH) – 5 phenolic acids was observed. Phenolic acids in inflorescences were 23.721 mg·100 g-1 DM, on average. Similarly as in the case of leaves, caffeic acid was also dominant one in total sum of compounds isolated from inflorescences.

Five phenolic acids were identified in FPA fraction of Silphium perfoliatum L. rhizomes. After acid (AH) and alkaline hydrolysis (BH), presence of 2 phenolic acids was found. Rhizomes contained 18.986 mg of phenolic acids in 100 g od dry matter, on average. Caffeic acid was dominant among all compounds isolated from rhizomes.

Phenolic acids in leaves, inflorescences and rhizomes released after alkaline hydrolysis had the highest share in sum of studied compounds, and those released after acid hydrolysis had the lowest percentage.

It could be stated that Silphium perfoliatum L. inflorescences contained the most phenolic acids, and rhizomes were characterized with the lowest content of compounds studied. Moreover, it was proved that caffeic acid dominated among all phenolic acids. It occurred mainly in bonded form and was released due to acid hydrolysis. The presence of significant amounts of caffeic acid can determine biological activity of extracts achieved from Silphium perfoliatum L. organs.

Wojcińska and Drost-Karbowska [26] in studies upon phenolic acids in disk and ray flowers of Silphium perfoliatum L. found the presence of following acids: caffeic, p-coumaric, ferulic, protocatechuic, p-hydroxybenzoic, vanillic and syringic. Authors stated that total content of all phenolic acids fractions (determined using HPLC technique) amounted to 20.202 mg·100 g-1 DM, including 16.217 mg·100 g-1 DM of free phenolic acids and 1.306 mg·100 g-1 DM of phenolic acids released after acid and 2.679 mg·100 g-1 DM after alkaline hydrolysis. They also proved that protocatechuic (7.170 mg·100 g-1 DM), caffeic (4.379 mg·100 g-1 DM) and p-coumaric acids (4.392 mg·100 g-1 DM) were dominant in group of phenolic acids. It is worth mentioning that caffeic acid occurred mainly in bonded form and it was released mostly after alkaline hydrolysis, wh ich is consistent with present results.

Recently in phytochemical studies, much attention has been paid to phenolic acids as substances having immunostimulative effects [1, 2]. Esther and glicoside connections of caffeic acid are of particular importance. In angiogenesis test (LIA), among others, caffeic acid at dose of 0.02 mg/kg/day/mouse showed the influence on angiogenic activity of mononucleous blood leukocytes at healthy humans [2]. At the same time, in SRBC test it was found that caffeic acid affected the production of IgG class antibodies at dose of 0.02 mg·kg-1. In vitro studies of mouse's tymocytes resistance to steroids revealed strong tymomimetic action of caffeic acid in the range of 0.1-100 µg·ml-1 of culture. Investigations prove that caffeic acid also shows antiseptic, antiviral, choleretic and cholekinetic properties [2, 3].

Caffeic acid and its derivatives in ester and heterozyde form (so-called “caffeoylics”) are of a special meaning in Asteraceae family [4, 5]. Among others, Echinacea genus is characterized with the occurrence of caffeic acid esters with sugars glicoside-like bonded with 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethylalcohol, i.e. so-called “phenylpropanoids”, whose representative is echinacoside [6]. Products of caffeic acid condensation of tannin character are also present in Lamiaceae family (sage, bahu and peppermint) [8]. The notion “caffeotannins” is more often used in literature. It more strictly characterizes the polyphenolic compounds occurring in Lamiaceae and Asteraceae families and showing properties of tannins. Therefore, Borkowski and Miłkowska [5] proposed to create the group of compounds derivatives of tannins – caffeotanoids including derivatives of caffeic and other phenolic acids descending from cinnamic acid and taking into account mainly their antiviral and immunost imulative actions [5, 7].

CONCLUSIONS

HPLC analysis revealed that leaves, inflorescences and rhizomes of Silphium perfoliatum L. contain following phenolic acids: caffeic, p-coumaric, ferulic, protocatechuic, p-hydroxybenzoic, vanillic and chlorogenic both in free and bonded form.

It was found that caffeic acid was dominant component of phenolic acid group isolated from material, particularly after alkaline hydrolysis, which can prove of the fact that it occurs in caffeoylic fraction.

Phenolic acids released after alkaline hydrolysis were of the highest percentage in studied phenolic acids fraction; those released after acid hydrolysis were characterized with the lowest share.

REFERENCES

  1. Borkowski B., 1993. Fenolokwasy i ich estry. Cz. I. [Phenolic acids and their esters. Part I.]. Herba Pol. 39 (1-2), 71-84 [in Polish].

  2. Borkowski B., 1993. Fenolokwasy i ich estry. Cz. II. [Phenolic acids and their esters. Part II.]. Herba Pol. 39 (3), 139-145 [in Polish].

  3. Borkowski B., Biesiadecka A., Litwińska B., 1996. Porównanie aktywno¶ci wirusostatycznej kwasów: kawowego, chlorogenowego i rozmarynowego [Comparison of virusostatic activity of caffeic, chlorogenic and rosmarinic acids]. Herba Pol. 42 (4), 317-321 [in Polish].

  4. Borkowski B., 1995. Składniki surowców leczniczych z rodziny Asteraceae z uwzględnieniem fenolokwasów [Chemical constituents of herbal plants from the Asteraceae family, with special interest paid on phenolic acids]. Herba Pol. 41 (3), 146-160 [in Polish].

  5. Borkowski B., Miłkowska K., 1996. Garbniki, tanoidy i zwi±zki pokrewne. IV. Kawolidy [Tannins, tanoids and related compounds. IV. Caffeoylics]. Herba Pol. 42 (3), 174-181 [in Polish].

  6. Borkowski B., Miłkowska K., 1996. Garbniki, tanoidy i zwi±zki pokrewne. V. Fenylopropanoidy [Tannins, tanoids and related compounds. V. Phenylpropanoids]. Herba Pol. 42 (3), 182-191 [in Polish].

  7. Borkowski B., Miłkowska K., 1997. Garbniki, tanoidy i zwi±zki pokrewne. IV. Nowe zasady klasyfikacji zwi±zków garbnikowych [Tannins, tanoids and related compounds. The new principles of tanoid classification]. Herba Pol. 43 (2), 165-171 [in Polish].

  8. Broda B., Jaroniewski W., ¦wi±tek L., 1960. O występowaniu kwasu kawowego w niektórych ro¶linach leczniczych [On the occurence of caffeine acids in some therapeutical plants]. Acta Polon. Pharm. 17 (4), 301-306 [in Polish].

  9. Clevinger J. A., Panero J. L., 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of Silphium and subtribe Engelmanninae (Asteraceae: Heliantheae) based on ITS and ETS sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 87 (4), 565-572.

  10. Davidjanc E. S., Kartaševa I. A., Nešin I. W., 1997. Wlijanie triterpenovych glikozidowv Silphium perfoliatum L. na fitopatogennye griby [The effect of triterpene glycosides of Silphium perfoliatum L. on phytopathogenic fungi]. Rast. Resursy 4, 93-98 [in Russian].

  11. Han K. J., Albrecht K. A., Mertens D. R., Kim D. A., 2000. Comparison of in vitro digestion kinetics of cup-plant and alfalfa. Asian-Australasian J. of Anim. Sciences 13 (5), 641-644.

  12. Han K. J., Albrecht K. A., Muck R. E., Kim D. A., 2000. Moisture effect on fermentation characteristics of cup-plant silage. Asian-Australasian J. of Anim. Sciences, 13 (5), 636-640.

  13. Herrick J. W., 1977. Iroquois medical botany. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, 468.

  14. Ibrahim R. K., Towers G. H. N., 1960. The identification, by chromatography, of plant phenolic acids. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 87, 125-128.

  15. Kowalski R., 2001. Analiza składu chemicznego organów nadziemnych i podziemnych rożnika przero¶niętego Silphium perfoliatum L. [Chemical analysis of above-ground and underground organs of Silphium perfoliatum L.]. Rozprawa doktorska (Doctoral disertation). Univ. of Agric. Lublin, 1-219 [in Polish].

  16. Kowalski R., 2002. Ocena zawarto¶ci oleanozydów w organach nadziemnych i podziemnych rożnika przero¶niętego Silphium perfoliatum L. [Evaluation of oleanosides content in above and underground organs of Silphium perfoliatum L.]. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 1(2), 5-15 [in Polish].

  17. Kowalski R., Wolski T., 2001. Charakterystyka wzrostu i rozwoju rożnika przero¶niętego Silphium perfoliatum L. w pierwszych latach uprawy [Characteristics of growth and development of Silphium perfoliatum L. in the first years of cultivation]. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska sec. EEE, 9, Supl., 311-317 [in Polish].

  18. Kujancewa A. M., Dawidjanc E. S., 1988. Silphium perfoliatum extract’s regeneration activity. Farmacija, Moskwa, 6, 36-37 [in Russian].

  19. Podbielkowski Z., 1995. Fitogeografia czę¶ci ¶wiata 2 [Phytogeography of the continents. Volume 2]. PWN, Warszawa, 90-91 [in Polish].

  20. Schmidtlein H., Herrmann K., 1975. Quantitative analysis for phenolic acids by thin-layer chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 115, 123-128.

  21. Syrov W. N., Chušbaktova Z. A., Davidjanc E. S., 1992. Triterpenovye glikozidy Silphium perfoliatum L. Gipolipidemičeskaja aktivnost’ sil’fiozida [The triterpene glicosides of Silphium perfoliatum L. Hipolipidemic activity of silphiozyd]. Chim. Farm. Żurnal 26, 66-69 [in Russian].

  22. Szweykowska A., Szweykowski J., 1995. Botanika Tom 2. Systematyka [Botany. Volume 2. Systematics]. PWN, Warszawa, 412-414 [in Polish].

  23. ¦wi±tek L., Dombrowicz E., 1984. Kwasy fenolowe w surowcach goryczowych. Cz. I. Badanie ziela piołunu i korzenia goryzcki [Phenolic acids in bitter drugs. Part I. Examination of absinth herb and gentian root]. Farm. Pol. 40, 729-732 [in Polish].

  24. Weryszko-Chmielewska E., Kowalski R., Wolski T., 1999. Rożnik przero¶nięty (Silphium perfoliatum L.) nowa ro¶lina alternatywna. Czę¶ć I. Badania morfologiczne i anatomiczne [Silphium perfoliatum L. – A new alternative plant. Part I. Morphological and anatomical investigation]. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 468, 497-505 [in Polish].

  25. Weryszko-Chmielewska E., Michońska M., Wolski T., Kowalski R., 1999. Porównanie cech morfologicznych kwiatów trzech gatunków Silphium z uwzględnieniem prezenterów pyłkowych i ziarn pyłku [Comparison of morphologica features of flowers in three Silphium species with consideration of pollen presenters and pollen grains]. Bibl. Frag. Agr. 6, 103-112 [in Polish].

  26. Wojcińska M., Drost-Karbowska K., 1998. Phenolic acids in Silphium perfoliatum L. flowers (Asteraceae/Compositae). Acta Pol. Pharm. 55 (5), 413-416.

  27. Wolski T., Kowalski R., 2000. Biologia wzrostu i rozwoju rożnika przero¶niętego (Silphium perfoliatum L.) [Biology of growth and development of Silphium perfoliatum L.]. Roczn. AR Pozn. 323, Ogrodn. 31, Cz. 1, 555-560 [in Polish].

  28. Wolski T., Kowalski R., Mardarowicz M., 2000. Chromatographic analysis of essential oil occuring in inflorescences, leaves and rhizomes of Silphium perfoliatum L. Herba Pol. 46 (4), 235-242.

  29. Wolski T., Kowalski R., Mardarowicz M., 1999. Chromatograficzne metody analizy ekstraktów z ziela, kwiatostanów i kł±czy rożnika przero¶niętego (Silphium perfoliatum L.) [Chromatographic analysis of extracts from herbal, inflorescences and rhizomes Silphium perfoliatum L.]. Mat. 4 Polish-Ukrainian Symposium on theoretical and experimental studies of interfacial phenomena and their technological applications & 10 Chromatographic Conference Science – Industry, “Chromatographic methods in the analysis of food and ecotoxicology”, Lublin, September 1-3, P-37a [in Polish].

  30. Wolski T., Kowalski R., Mardarowicz M., Weryszko-Chmielewska E., 1999. Rożnik przero¶nięty (Silphium perfoliatum L.) nowa ro¶lina alternatywna. Czę¶ć II. Badania fitochemiczne [Silphium perfoliatum L. – A new alternative plant. Part II. Phytochemical analysis]. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 468, 507-517 [in Polish].


Radosław Kowalski
Central Apparatus Laboratory and Sub-department of Instrumental Food Stuff Analysis
Agricultural University in Lublin
13 Akademicka Street, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
tel. (+48 81) 445 69 16
fax: (+46 81) 533 35 49
e-mail:radko@ursus.ar.lublin.pl

Tadeusz Wolski
Department of Pharmacognosy
Medical University in Lublin
12 Peowiaków Street, 20-007 Lublin, Poland
Department of Vegetable and Medicinal Plants
Agricultural University in Lublin
58 Kr. Leszczyńskiego Street, 20-069 Lublin, Poland


Responses to this article, comments are invited and should be submitted within three months of the publication of the article. If accepted for publication, they will be published in the chapter headed ‘Discussions’ in each series and hyperlinked to the article.


[BACK] [MAIN] [HOW TO SUBMIT] [SUBSCRIPTION] [ISSUES] [SEARCH]