Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities (EJPAU) founded by all Polish Agriculture Universities presents original papers and review articles relevant to all aspects of agricultural sciences. It is target for persons working both in science and industry,regulatory agencies or teaching in agricultural sector. Covered by IFIS Publishing (Food Science and Technology Abstracts), ELSEVIER Science - Food Science and Technology Program, CAS USA (Chemical Abstracts), CABI Publishing UK and ALPSP (Association of Learned and Professional Society Publisher - full membership). Presented in the Master List of Thomson ISI.
2002
Volume 5
Issue 1
Topic:
Food Science and Technology
ELECTRONIC
JOURNAL OF
POLISH
AGRICULTURAL
UNIVERSITIES
D±browski W. , Iwański R. , Bednarska M. , Mędrala D. 2002. THE EFFECT OF CULTURE CONDITIONS ON HYDROPHOBICITY OF STRAINS OF LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES ISOLATED FROM FOOD, EJPAU 5(1), #01.
Available Online: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume5/issue1/food/art-01.html

THE EFFECT OF CULTURE CONDITIONS ON HYDROPHOBICITY OF STRAINS OF LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES ISOLATED FROM FOOD

Waldemar D±browski, Robert Iwański, Magdalena Bednarska, Dagmara Mędrala

 

ABSTRACT

The effect of incubation temperature on hydrophobic properties of Listeria spp. using ammonium sulphate aggregation test was analyzed. 29 strains of Listeria spp. isolated from beef, pork and smoked fish were tested. Results show that reducing the incubation temperature causes transformation of hydrophilic Listeria spp. into hydrophobic.

Key words: Listeria monocytogenes, hydrophobicity.

INTRODUCTION

Listeria spp. are widely distributed in the environment. They are present in water, soil, vegetation and animal gastrointestinal tracts. Listeria monocytogenes and occasionally L. ivanovii, L. seligeri, L. grayi are considered to be human pathogens. In favorable circumstances they can proliferate in an organism and lead to life-threatening disease called listeriosis which generally affects compromised groups of people. Until quite recently cases of human listeriosis were rare and not recognized as a serious epidemiological problem. The significant increase of incidence of listeriosis has been observed in Western Europe, United States and Canada since the 1980s. Epidemiological data point to transmission to human through the food ingestion. Food of the animal origin is considered to be the main source of infection [9]. Attachment of bacteria to surfaces is the initial step of either human infection or contamination of raw material and processing environment. Not only physical and chemical parameters of surface but also external cell wall structures and their properties account for successful attachment of cells to surface. One of the most significant properties which play an important role in such process is hydrophobicity of cell wall. Conditions for optimal growth of bacteria deteriorate during production, processing, retail and storage of food. It causes changes in surface structures of cells and may influence their hydrophobic properties. There are few data concerning this subject in the literature. It may be the reason why the results reported by various authors are inconsistent; L. monocytogenes is regarded either as hydrophilic [7, 11], or as hydrophobic [1, 12, 3]. In this paper we present results of studies on the effect of incubation temperature on hydrophobicity of cultured strains of L. monocytogenes isolated from food.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Listeria spp. isolated from beef, pork and smoked fish were analyzed. Identification of strains was preformed using API Listeria tests and PCR technique (detection of hly gene) as described previously [6]. Before the experiment the strains had been cultured on Listeria Selective Agar (LSA) + Listeria Selective Supplement (Oxoid) and incubated at 30°C for 48 h. Then, they were streaked onto (BTL) and incubated at 30°C, 20°C and 5°C. Samples at 30°C and 20°C were incubated for 48 h whereas samples at 5oC were stored for 2 weeks. Characteristic of strains is presented in Table 1.

Tab. 1. Strains of Listeria spp. used in the studies

Strains

Identification

Source

1. 1-II

L.monocytogenes

pork

2. 1-IV

L.monocytogenes

pork

3. 1-XV

L.monocytogenes

pork

4. 1-V

L.monocytogenes

pork

5. 2-II

L.monocytogenes

pork

6. 15

L.monocytogenes

pork

7. 19

L.monocytogenes

pork

8. 2-XI

L.monocytogenes

pork

9. 2-XVI

L.monocytogenes

pork

10. 21

L.monocytogenes

pork

11. 3-1

L.monocytogenes

beef

12. 3-V

L.monocytogenes

beef

13. 3-VII

L.monocytogenes

beef

14. 3-X

L.monocytogenes

beef

15. 4-XI

L.monocytogenes

beef

16. 4-IX

L.monocytogenes

beef

17. 34-X

L.monocytogenes

beef

18. 35

L.monocytogenes

smoked fish

19. 61

L.welshimerii

pork

20. M-9

L.welshimerii

pork

21. 2-VI

L.welshimerii

pork

22. 30

L.welshimerii

pork

23. 34

L.welshimerii

smoked fish

24. 36

L.welshimerii

smoked fish

25. 4-VII

L.innocua

beef

26. 37

L.innocua

smoked fish

27. 38

L.innocua

smoked fish

28. 39

L.innocua

smoked fish

29. 40

L.innocua

smoked fish

Analyses of hydrophobicity of strains used in the studies (salting test with ammonium sulphate) were preformed according to modified method described by Rozgonyi et al. [14].

Cultures were washed off from the solid medium and suspended in saline to obtain McFarland density 6°. 20 µl of suspension was mixed with 20 µl of ammonium sulphate at concentrations from 0.1 to 3.2 M on Micro Test II plates (Falcon). Negative control was included with ammonium sulphate substituted by saline. The plate was rocked gently for 1 min and the aggregation effect was observed by a magnifying glass. Strains which aggregated at 0.1-0.2 M ammonium sulphate were considered to be hydrophobic.

Aggregation at 0.4-1.0 M was characteristic of medium hydrophobicity whereas strains aggregating at 1.2-1.6 M were regarded as hydrophilic. Aggregation or its lack at 1.8 M or higher concentrations referred to hydrophilic strains.

RESULTS

The effect of incubation temperature on hydrophobic properties of strains of Listeria spp. tested with ammonium sulphate was analyzed. Results showed that reducing the incubation temperature causes transformation of hydrophilic strains into hydrophobic. Transformation depended on Listeria species and did not affect all tested strains in the same level.

At 30°C (Fig. 1.), the highest rate of hydrophobic strains was found in L. innocua (38%). There were 19% of each hydrophobic and low hydrophobic strains. Among L. welshimerii only 15% strains was low hydrophobic and 85% of hydrophilic.

Fig. 1. Hydrophobicity of strains Listeria spp. incubated at 30°C

No hydrophobic strains were found within L. monocytogenes incubated at 30oC whereas 4% of medium hydrophobic and 25% of low hydrophobic isolates were observed. 71% of hydrophilic strains of L. monocytogenes was detected. 3% of hydrophobic, 3% of medium hydrophobic, 20% of low hydrophobic and 74% of hydrophilic strains were found among all Listeria spp. tested (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Hydrophobic properties of strains of Listeria spp. incubated at different temperatures

At 20°C the significant differences in hydrophobicity were detected (Fig. 3). Among isolates of L. innocua 62% of hydrophobic, 19% of low hydrophobic and only 19% of hydrophilic strains was detected. Listeria welshimeri was represented by 35% of hydrophobic and 65% of hydrophilic strains. Within isolates of L. monocytogenes 22% of strains was hydrophobic, 17% of medium hydrophobic, 28% of low hydrophobic and 33% of hydrophilic. Concluding, the effect of 20°C on Listeria spp. 30% of strains became hydrophobic, 10% medium hydrophobic, 23% low hydrophobic and 37% remained hydrophilic (Fig. 2).

Fig. 3. Hydrophobicity of strains of Listeria spp. incubated at 20°C

Incubation temperature lowered to 5°C did not increase transformation of strains of Listeria spp. into hydrophobic (Fig. 4). The greatest changes were observed among strains of L. monocytogenes tested: 50% of them were hydrophobic, 19% low hydrophobic and 31% remained hydrophilic. Significant changes were also observed in L. welshimerii: 35% of strains became hydrophobic 15% medium hydrophobic and 35% remained hydrophilic.

Fig. 4. Hydrophobicity of strains of Listeria spp. incubated at 5°C

The correlation between hydrophobicity and source of isolates was also analyzed. At 30oC the hydrophilic strains came mainly from pork (33%) whereas only 16.6% was isolated from smoked fish (Fig. 5.)

Fig. 5. Changes of hydrophobicity of Listeria spp. correlated with the origin of isolates. Incubation at 30°C

At 5°C most strains transforming into hydrophobic came from pork isolates (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6. Changes of hydrophobicity of Listeria spp. correlated with the origin of isolates. Incubation at 5°C

DISCUSSION

Listeria monocytogenes is often isolated from food products. As yet the reason of listeriosis which has been recorded since 1985 is not explained satisfactorily. It may be caused by changes in production, processing, packaging, retail and storage of food products. Introduction of products with extended shelf-life promotes multiplying of microorganisms during storage of food in conditions different than optimal e.g. in low temperature, vacuum atmosphere which may affect their surface structures. Among other things such changes influence hydrophobicity. In our studies we analyzed the effect of incubation temperature on this particular property of microorganisms isolated from pork, beef and smoked fish. Three incubation temperatures were applied: 30°C-the optimum for growth of L. monocytogenes, 20°C-an equivalent of ambient temperature and 5oC-temperature of food storage. We stated that lowering of incubation temperature results in decrease of hydrophilic strains and increase of hydrophobic strains, what is presented in Figure 2. Surprisingly, even a slight change of incubation temperature from 30°C to 20°C alters surface properties diametrically. It is essential that this change affects particular strains to a different degree. The intensity may be different and depends on hydrophobic transforming degree. Different degrees of hydrophobicity were detected among isolates tested whereas some strains remained hydrophilic. As already mentioned, the opinions on hydrophobicity of L. monocytogenes are divergent. L. monocytogenes is considered either hydrophilic or hydrophobic. It is probably result of different culture conditions and various strains tested. Briandet demonstrated on a frequently tested Scott strain of L. monocytogenes that even a slight modification of a medium composition and lowering the incubation time changed it into hydrophobic [5].

It is in agreement with our results but we additionally provide evidence that not all strains subject to hydrophobic changes to the same level and some of them may remain hydrophilic. Such transformation can have serious clinical and practical implications. It was proved that pathogenic strains of bacteria and fungi isolated from clinical cases and the environment are hydrophobic [4]. It is of crucial importance for pathogenic microorganisms. Tissue or cell surfaces including enterocytes in gastrointestinal tracts are hydrophobic [13]. First stage of infection is adhesion of bacteria to cells. Studies on L. monocytogenes show that hydrophobic strains demonstrate specific adhesion [5]. Unfavorable conditions in processing plants and during storage of food promote changes of strains into hydrophobic and may facilitate an infection process. Evidently the strains changing into high-hydrophobic will be promoted.

In our studies we observed the correlation among the environment of which strains originated, their hydrophobicity and ability to modify. Pork strains were able to change into hydrophobic exceedingly. It suggests that the fat-rich environment promotes and selects such strains. Selection of strains occurring in food processing plants and their colonization by one strain, characteristic and analogous to intrahospital strains is described by Autio et al. [2].

The practical aspect of studies on hydrophobicity of Listeria spp. and the other food-borne human pathogens is clearly seen considering that spores of bacteria and fungi, cocci and Salmonella spp. are hydrophobic [8, 15, 10]. It enables to aim the lookout for hydrophilic food packages which could prevent microorganisms from colonizing them.

The correlation between hydrophobicity and Listeria species was analyzed. Incubated at 30°C, 38% strains of L. innocua were found to be hydrophobic, L. monocytogenes and L. welshimeri had 29% and 15% of hydrophobic strains, respectively. At 20°C L. innocua is more frequently than the others high hydrophobic. Results explain why L. innocua is the most often found in fat-rich products (milk, fish, cheese) whereas L. monocytogenes is isolated rarely and L. welshimeri is the rarest in such products.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. Hydrophobic properties of cell surface of Listeria spp. were significantly affected by incubation temperature.

  2. A vast majority of strains of Listeria spp. was hydrophilic at 30°C.

  3. The increase of hydrophobic strains was observed at 5°C and 20°C.

  4. At 5°C hydrophobic strains were dominant for L. monocytogenes.

  5. Pork isolates were found to present the greatest ability to transform into hydrophobic strains.

REFERENCES

  1. Al-Makhlafi H., Nasir A., Mc Guire J., Daeschel M., 1995. Adhesion of Listeria monocytogenes to silica surfaces after sequential and competitive adsorption of bovine serum albumin and beta-lacto globulin. Appl. Env. Microbiol., 61, 2013-2015.

  2. Autio T., Säteri T., Fredriksson-Ahomma M., Rahiko M., Lundén J., Korkeala H., 2000. Listeria monocytogenes contamination pattern in pig slaughterhouses. J. Food Prot., 63, 1438-1442.

  3. Benedict R.C., 1990. Listeria monocytogenes: physiology and metabolism. In: Food borne Listeriosis. Elsevier, London.

  4. Benito Y., Pin C., Marin M.L., Garcia M.L., Selgas M.D., Casas C., 1997. Cell surface hydrophobicity and attachment of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria to meat surfaces. Meat Sci., 45, 419-425.

  5. Briandet R., Meylheuc T., Maher C., Bellon-Fontaine M.N., 1999. Listeria monocytogenes Scott A: Cell surface charge, hydrophobicity, and electron donor and acceptor characteristic under different environmental growth conditions. Appl. Env. Microbiol., 65, 5328-5333.

  6. D±browski W., Czekajło-Kołodziej U., Mędrala D., Bogusławska-W±s E., Giedrys-Kalemba S., 2001. Optimization of AP-PCR and RAPD fingerprinting for clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. In printing.

  7. Dickson J.S., Koohmaraie M., 1989. Cell surface charge characteristics and their relationship to bacterial attachment to meat surfaces. Appl. Env. Microbiol., 55, 832-836.

  8. Doyle R.J., Rosenberg M., 1993. Microbial cell surface hydrophobicity. Am. Soc. Microbiol. Washington D.C.

  9. Kwiatek K., 1993. Występowanie L. monocytogenes w mięsie oraz produktach mięsnych [Appearance of L. monocytogenes in meat and meat products]. Życie Wet., 12, 304-306 [In Polish].

  10. Macura A., 1993. Adhesion of fungi Candida ssp. to cells of mammals. Post. Microbiol., 32, 321-335.

  11. Mafu A.A. Roy D., Goulet J., Savoie L., 1991. Characterization of physicochemical forces involved in adhesion of Listeria monocytogenes to surfaces. Appl. Env. Microbiol., 57, 1969-1973.

  12. Maisnier-Patin S., Richard J., 1996. Cell wall changes in nisin-resistant variants of Listeria innocua grown in the presence of high nisin concentrations. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 140, 29-35.

  13. Nagao P.E., Benchetrit L.C., 1999. Virulent and avirulent strains of group B streptococci form Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Relationship between differences in surface hydrophobicity sialic acid content and macrophage Interaction. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, 94, 497-498.

  14. Rozgonyi F., Szitha K.R., Hjertén S., Wadström T., 1985. Standardization of salt aggregation test for reproducible determination of cell-surface hydrophobicity with special reference to Staphylococcus species. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 59, 451-457.

  15. Smit G., Straver M.H., Lugtenberg B.J.J., Kijne J.W., 1992. Flocculence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells is induced by nutrient limitation with cell surface hydrophobicity as a major determinat. Appl. Env. Microbiol., 58, 3709-3714.


Waldemar D±browski, Robert Iwański, Magdalena Bednarska, Dagmara Mędrala
Department of Food Microbiology
Agricultural University of Szczecin
ul. Papieża Pawła VI 3, 71-459, Szczecin
e-mail: micro@tz.ar.szczecin.pl

Responses to this article, comments are invited and should be submitted within three months of the publication of the article. If accepted for publication, they will be published in the chapter headed ‘Discussions’ in each series and hyperlinked to the article.


[BACK] [MAIN] [HOW TO SUBMIT] [SUBSCRIPTION] [ISSUES] [SEARCH]