Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities (EJPAU) founded by all Polish Agriculture Universities presents original papers and review articles relevant to all aspects of agricultural sciences. It is target for persons working both in science and industry,regulatory agencies or teaching in agricultural sector. Covered by IFIS Publishing (Food Science and Technology Abstracts), ELSEVIER Science - Food Science and Technology Program, CAS USA (Chemical Abstracts), CABI Publishing UK and ALPSP (Association of Learned and Professional Society Publisher - full membership). Presented in the Master List of Thomson ISI.
2002
Volume 5
Issue 1
Topic:
Fisheries
ELECTRONIC
JOURNAL OF
POLISH
AGRICULTURAL
UNIVERSITIES
Jankowska B. , Kwiatkowska A. , Kolman R. , Szczepkowska B. 2002. A COMPARISON OF CERTAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF MEAT OF THE SIBERIAN STURGEON (Acipenser baeri Brandt) , EJPAU 5(1), #01.
Available Online: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume5/issue1/fisheries/art-01.html

A COMPARISON OF CERTAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF MEAT OF THE SIBERIAN STURGEON (ACIPENSER BAERI BRANDT)

Barbara Jankowska, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Ryszard Kolman, Bożena Szczepkowska

 

ABSTRACT

al species meat lipids, the differences resulting from higher contents of two long chain n–3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC n–3 PUFA): eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic.

Key words: sturgeons, meat, colour, basic nutrients, fatty acids.

INTRODUCTION

The last decades of the 20th century witnessed a rapid decline in the size of natural populations of numerous acipenserids which had been a sources of dietetically valuable meat and roe (caviar). The decline has, however, boosted interest in the controlled acipenserid culture [5, 9, 16, 17]. To increase the efficiency of intensive sturgeon production, hybrids of genetically distant species have been bred; as a result of heterosis, the hybrids show high growth and survival rates [1,2, 13]. In addition to providing better culture indices, hybrids frequently differ from their parent species in having a higher quality meat [3]. Unfortunately, there are but a few papers on acipenserid hybrid meat quality, those papers concerning mostly the bester, the oldest and the best known hybrid of the beluga (Huso huso L.) and the sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus L.) [6, 12, 13].

In 1995, the first (and – so far – only) hybrid of the Siberian sturgeon (A. baeri Brandt) and the green sturgeon (A. medirostris Ayres) was bred. Comparative studies showed the new hybrid, when kept in basins, to grow by about 50% faster than the Siberian sturgeon and to be a more efficient feed converter [8]. As the literature lacks information on the hybrid’s utility, it was considered necessary to initiate research aimed at determining the hybrid meat quality and to compare it with that of the maternal species, the Siberian sturgeon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study involved randomly choosen individuals of the Siberian sturgeon and its hybrid, kept together in a concrete basin filled with water subject to the outdoor temperature regime. The Siberian sturgeon and the hybrid were aged 3+ and 6+, respectively. The fish were left to overwinter together, without food, in the basin. Feeding commenced in spring, after the ice cover had thawed, by offering the Aller–45/15 trout pelleted feed containing 45, 21, and 15% of protein, carbohydrates, and lipids, respectively. Initially, the feed rations were low due to the low fish demand for food; as the water temperature grew, the feed rations were increased. When the fish were sampled for their meat to be assayed, water temperature varied within 19–22°C, i.e., the range optimal for growth of most acipenserids [10]. Daily feed rations at that time were 0.8–1.0% of body weight, which was consistent with the published feeding nomograms [9].

The assays involved three individuals from each species. The fish were beheaded by using a straight cut, gutted, and filleted. One skinned fillet from each individual provided meat colour parameters, basic nutrients, and the fatty acid profiles of which were determined. Before each assay, a fillet was minced twice in a 3 mm mesh size meat grinder, the mince obtained being thoroughly mixed.

Meat colour parameters were determined in a Dr. Lange Spectro–color spectrophotometer with a 10 mm measuring aperture, D65 illuminant, 10° standard observer, and SPECTRAL–QC computer software. Prior to each series of measurements, the spectrophotometer was calibrated using the Dr. Lange black and white standards. The instrumental colour measurements made it possible to express the colour numerically in a tri–dimensional space, by determining the trichromatic coordinates compatible with the CIE Uniform Chromaticity Scale: L* (lightness), a* (redness), and b* (yellowness). The chromaticity (colour saturation) C* [(a*2 + b*2)1/2] and hue H* [=arctan (b*/a*)] were calculated. Mean values of the colour parameters were calculated from three separate measurements.

The meat water content was determined after drying the samples at 105°C to constant weight (according to the Polish Standard PN–73A–082110); the crude protein content was determined with the Kjeldahl method, using conversion factor of 6.25 {Polish Standard PN–73A–04018); the lipid content was determined with the Soxhlet technique utilising paraffin ether as solvent (Polish Standard PN–73A–820111); the total mineral content was determined by combusting the samples at 525–550oC [15]. Mean values were calculated from five separate assays of each parameter.

The qualitative and quantitative analyses of fatty acids were conducted after cold extraction of muscle lipids as described by Folch et al. [4]. Fatty acids were methylated with a 100:100:1 mixture of chloroform:methanol:sulphuric acid [14]. Fatty acids were separated in an HP 6890 gas chromatograph with a flame–ionization detector (FID); the 0.32 mm internal diameter chromatograph capillary column was 30 m long. The liquid stationary phase was provided by 0.25µm thick Supelcowax 10 film. Separation was carried out with helium as a carrier gas, the flow rate used being 1 ml min–1. The detector, injector, and column temperatures were 250, 225, and 185oC, respectively. Detector signals were registered by a 10 mm min–1 paper speed Philips recorder using a 1 mV scale.

RESULTS

Various fish species differ significantly in their colour which depends primarily on the amount of myoglobin, the essential haeme pigment, and also on the amount of carotenoids, whenever those are present. The visual examination of meat of the Siberian sturgeon and the hybrid showed the meat of the first to be white–grey, while the other had meat similar in coloration to that of salmonids, preferred by consumers.

The instrumental colour measurement showed the Siberian sturgeon meat lightness to be 69.49, the hybrid meat producing a lower lightness (59.20). Typical of the hybrid meat were also higher values of a* and b*, which demonstrates the colour to have higher redness and yellowness, compared to the meat of the maternal species. Along the same line, the value of C*, equivalent to the overall chromaticity calculated from a* and b*, differed in the two species. The C* data showed the Siberian sturgeon meat to have a lower colour saturation (intensity). In addition, the meat of the two species differed in hue, as shown by different values of H* (Table 1). Thus the values of all the parameters provide evidence that meat of the Siberian sturgeon x green sturgeon hybrid differs in colour from the maternal species.

The analysis of basic nutrients showed the hybrid meat lipid content to be 6.4%, i.e., it was lower by more than 3 %, compared to that in the maternal species. The lower lipid content was compensated for by higher contents of water (77.4%) and protein (15.2%), the corresponding values in the Siberian sturgeon meat being 75.2 and 14.3%, respectively. The total mineral content was similar in both species (0.9%; Table 2).

Table 1. Siberian sturgeon and hybrid meat colour parameters

Sturgeon species

L*
± SD

a*
± SD

b*
± SD

C*
± SD

H*
± SD

Siberian sturgeon

69.49 ± 3.58

0.87 ± 0.12

18.76 ± 1.91

18.78 ± 1.10

87.39 ± 3.32

Hybrid

59.20 ± 2.15

5.69 ± 0.34

25.62 ± 1.75

26.25 ± 1.21

77.52 ± 3.58

Table 2. Contents of basic nutrients (%) and energy (kcal 100 g–1/KJ 100 g–1) of the Siberian sturgeon and hybrid meat

Sturgeon species

Water
± SD

Protein
± SD

Lipids
± SD

Mineral components
± SD

Energy content
± SD

Siberian sturgeon

75.2 ± 0.75

14.3 ± 0.72

9.5 ± 0.39

0.9 ± 0.03

143.2 /598.5/ ± 4.82

Hybrid

77.4 ± 0.44

15.2 ± 0.41

6.4 ± 0.47

0.9 ± 0.04

118.6 /495.7/ ± 3.99

The higher lipid level of the Siberian sturgeon meat resulted in its higher energy content, 143.2 kcal (100 g)–1 [598.5 kJ (100 g)–1], compared to 118.6 kcal (100 g)–1 [495.7 kJ (100 g)–1] in the hybrid.

Another criterion used to compare meat of the two sturgeon species involved the qualitative and quantitative analysis of fatty acids; the relevant results are summarised in Table 3.

Table 3. The Siberian sturgeon and hybrid meat lipid fatty acid profiles

Fatty acid

Siberian sturgeon

hybrid

mg g–1 lipids

%

mg g–1 lipids

%

C 14:0

28.73 ± 1.60

4.40

39.31 ± 2.34

4.87

C 15:0

2.36 ± 0.26

0.36

3.82 ± 0.99

0.47

C 16:0

112.43 ± 7.49

17.21

150.96 ± 10.11

18.69

C 18:0

12.01 ± 4.33

1.84

13.50 ± 2.41

1.67

C 20:0

0.84 ± 0.09

0.13

1.15 ± 0.10

0.14

Total, saturated fatty acids

156.37 ± 5.13

23.93

208.74 ± 7.34

25.84

C 14:1

1.38 ± 0.67

0.21

2.03 ± 0.56

0.25

C 16:1

33.34 ± 3.09

5.10

51.92 ± 4.65

6.43

C 18:1 cis9

206.69 ± 8.22

31.63

206.02 ± 8.18

25.51

C 18:1 cis 11

18.37 ± 0.68

2.81

22.80 ± 2.09

2.82

C 20:1 n–9

62.45 ± 2.78

9.56

53.03 ± 3.87

6.56

C 22:1

35.21 ± 1.99

5.39

32.20 ± 3.65

3.99

C 22:1 n–9

5.82 ± 0.09

0.89

4.79 ± 0.45

0.59

Total, mono–unsaturated fatty acids

363.26 ± 8.11

55.59

372.79 ± 9.56

46.15

C 18:2 n–6

26.98 ± 1.98

4.13

35.25 ± 2.68

4.36

C 18:3 n–3

6.48 ± 0.57

0.99

9.74 ± 0.87

1.21

C 18:4 n–3

6.03 ± 0.40

0.92

10.76 ± 1.89

1.33

C 20:2 n–6

2.82 ± 0.34

0.43

3.21 ± 0.43

0.40

C 20:4 n–6

3.12 ± 0.30

0.48

4.55 ± 0.56

0.56

C 20:4 n–3

6.61 ± 0.39

1.01

7.71 ± 1.01

0.95

C 20:5 n–3

26.23 ± 3.11

4.01

48.77 ± 3.60

6.04

C 22:5 n–3

9.54 ± 1.15

1.46

15.12 ± 1.12

1.87

C 22:6 n3

45.98 ± 3.89

7.04

91.11 ± 7.90

11.28

Total, polyunsaturated fatty acids

133.79 ± 6.75

20.47

223.22 ± 6.89

28.01

Total, unsaturated fatty acids

497.0 ± 6.475

76.07

596.01 ± 5.90

74.16

Both kinds of meat were found to contain the same saturated and unsaturated C14 to C22 fatty acids. Lipids of both species contained five saturated fatty acids, their levels being similar. The saturated fatty acids contributed 23.93 and 25.84% to the total fatty acid pool in meat of the Siberian sturgeon and hybrid, respectively.

The unsaturated to saturated fatty acid ratio, amounting to 3.18 and 2.87 in meat of the Siberian sturgeon and hybrid, respectively, demonstrated the domination of unsaturated fatty acids, typical of fish meat. This domination was very pronounced in meat of both species.

The unsaturated fatty acids consisted of mono– and polyunsaturated acids. They contributed 46.15 and 28.01%, respectively, to all the fatty acids of the hybrid meat, while contributing 55.59 and 20.47%, respectively, to all the fatty acids of the Siberian sturgeon meat. Thus the hybrid lipids contained less monounsaturated acids, which resulted primarily from a lower contribution of the dominant oleic acid. On the other hand, the hybrid meat lipids showed a higher content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) belonging to the n–3 and n–6 families and involving from 2 to 6 double bonds per molecule. Among those acids, linoleic, a– and g–linolenic, octadecatetraenic, eicosadienic, arachidonic, eicosatetraenic, and docosapentaenoic acids contributed similarly to the fatty acid pool in lipids of the two species. Larged differences were found in the contents of eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (DHA) acids the contributions of which to the total fatty acid pool were by 2.03 and by 4.24.% higher in the hybrid meat than in that of the maternal species. Thus it was mainly the differences in the per cent contributions of those two fatty acids that were decisive for the higher total contant of polyunsaturated fatty acids in the hybrid meat lipids.

The results showed the hybrid meat, compared to the Siberian sturgeon meat, to have a markedly higher PUFA content, beneficial from the standpoint of the biological value of the lipids. Eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids, pivotal in this respect, belong to the long chain n–3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC n–3 PUFA) the presence of which is the most characteristic feature of fish lipids. The beneficial effects of fish meat on human health is primarily related to the biological activity of those two acids [7, 11].

Data on the n–3 PUFA contents in 100 g fish meat and the n–3 to n–6 acid ratio are a very valuable information for a consumer. The results obtained showed the total n–3 fatty acid content to be 1170.7 mg (100 g)–1 hybrid meat, the respective contents of EPA and DHA being 311.6 and 582.1 mg (100 g)–1 (Table 4). The contents mentioned are higher than those shown by meat of the maternal species. The n–3 to n–6 ratio, too, is better in the hybrid meat than in the Siberian sturgeon meat.

Table 4. Contents of n–3 and n–6 PUFA (mg per 100 g meat) in Siberian sturgeon and hybrid

Sturgeon species

EPA

DHA

n–3

n–6

n–3/n–6

Siberian sturgeon

250.7

439.5

964.3

314.7

2.0

Hybrid

311.6

582.1

1170.7

274.8

4.2

CONCLUSIONS

  1. Meat of the Siberian sturgeon x green sturgeon hybrid shows a very desirable, salmon–like color the characteristics of which are differ than those of the maternal species (Siberian sturgeon).

  2. The hybrid meat contains less lipids, more protein, and more water, compared to the Siberian sturgeon meat.

  3. The hybrid meat outcompetes meat of the maternal species in having a higher total content of n–3 polyunsaturated fatty acids as well as higher contents of EPA and DHA.


REFERENCES

  1. Burtsev I.A., 1969. Poluchenie potomstva ot mezhrodovogo gobrida belugi so sterljad'ju. In: Genetika, selektsja i gibridizatsja ryb. Red. B.I. Cherfas, Izd. “Nauka” Moskva, 232–242.

  2. Burtsev I.A., Nikolaev A.I., Arefjev B.A., Serebrjakova E.V., Slizchenko A.G., 1987. Osobennosti vozvratnykh form bestera i napravlenija selektsji s ikh ispol'zovaniem. W: Geneticheskie issledovanija morskikh gidrobiontov. Sorn. Nauch. Trud. Moskva, VNIRO, 143–156.

  3. Dorofeeva T.A.,. Petrichenko T.A., Dolzhenko S.A., 1982. Pishchevaya tsennost’ trekhletkov belugi, bestera i vozvratnogo gibrida. Rybn. Khoz., 9, 63–64.

  4. Folch H., Less M., Stanley H.A., 1957. A simple method for isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem., 226, 497–499.

  5. Gershanovich A.D., Burtsev I.A., 1993, Budut li zhit' osetry v XXI w. Rybn. Khoz., 4, 18–20.

  6. Hiraoka K., Naruse U., 1999. Effect of starvation on fatty acid composition on farmed sturgeon. J. Appl. Ichtiol., 15, 327–331.

  7. Kolanowski W., 2000. Olej rybi jako Ľródło kwasów tłuszczowych omega–3, znaczenie zdrowotne i wzbogacanie żywno¶ci [Fish oil as a source of omega–3 fatty acids; health benefits and food enrichment]. Przem. Spoż., 9, 56–58 [in Polish].

  8. Kolman R., Szczepkowski M., Pyka J., 1997. Evaluation of the siberian sturgeon (A. baeri Brant) and green sturgeon (A. medirostris Ayres) hybrid comparing to the mother species. Arch. Ryb. Pol., 5, 1, 51–58.

  9. Kolman R., 1998. Chów ryb jesiotrowatych [Acipenserid culture]. IRS, Olsztyn, 177 [in Polish].

  10. Kolman R., 1999. Jesiotry [Sturgeons]. IRS, Olsztyn, 136 [in Polish].

  11. Kołakowska A., Kołakowski E., 2000. Warto¶ć żywieniowa ryb. In: Materiały 31. Sesji Naukowej KTiChŻ PAN [The nutritive value of fish. In: Proceedings of the 31st Scientific Session of the Polish Academy of Sciences’ Committee on Food Technology and Chemistry]. Poznań 14–15 September 2000, 119–129 [in Polish].

  12. Naruse U., Oyaizu M., Akita M., Sekimoto K., 1993. Lipid composition of different bester organs and tissues. I Internat. Symp. of Sturg. Abstract biulletin. VNIRO Moscow, 98–99

  13. Nikolyukin N.I., 1952. Mezhvidovaja gibridizatsija ryb. Saratovskoe Oblastnoe Gos. Izd., 29–53.

  14. Peisker K., 1964. Rapid semi–micro method for methyl esters from triglycerides using chloroform, methanol, sulphuric acid. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 11, 87–90.

  15. Rutkowska U., 1981. Wybrane metody badania składu i warto¶ci odżywczej żywno¶ci [Selected methods of analysis of food composition and nutritive value]. PZWL, Warszawa [in Polish].

  16. Steffens W., Jhnichen H., Fredrich F., 1990. Possibilities of sturgeon culture in Central Europe. Aquaculture 89, 101–122.

  17. Willot P., Bronzi P., Arlati G., 1993. A very brief survey of status and prospects of freshwater sturgeon farming in Europe. In Workshop on aquaculture of freshwater species (except salmonids) P. Kestemont and R. Billard (Ed.). Eur. Aquac. Soc. Spec. Publ., 20, 32–36 Gent, Belgium.


Barbara Jankowska, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska
Department of Meat Technology and Chemistry
University of Warmia and Mazury
Plac Cieszyński 1, 10–718 Olsztyn Kortowo, Poland
e–mail: akwiat@uwm.edu.pl

Ryszard Kolman
Department of Ichthyology
Institute of Inland Fisheries
Oczapowskiego 10, 70–719 Olsztyn–Kortowo, Poland
e-mail: kolrys@wp.pl

Bożena Szczepkowska
Institute of Inland Fisheries
“Drgał” Stocking Centre
10–610 Pieczarki, Poland
e-mail: dgal@in fish.com.pl


Responses to this article, comments are invited and should be submitted within three months of the publication of the article. If accepted for publication, they will be published in the chapter headed ‘Discussions’ in each series and hyperlinked to the article.


[BACK] [MAIN] [HOW TO SUBMIT] [ISSUES] [SUBSCRIPTION]