Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities (EJPAU) founded by all Polish Agriculture Universities presents original papers and review articles relevant to all aspects of agricultural sciences. It is target for persons working both in science and industry,regulatory agencies or teaching in agricultural sector. Covered by IFIS Publishing (Food Science and Technology Abstracts), ELSEVIER Science - Food Science and Technology Program, CAS USA (Chemical Abstracts), CABI Publishing UK and ALPSP (Association of Learned and Professional Society Publisher - full membership). Presented in the Master List of Thomson ISI.
2000
Volume 3
Issue 2
Topic:
Horticulture
ELECTRONIC
JOURNAL OF
POLISH
AGRICULTURAL
UNIVERSITIES
Ja¶kiewicz B. 2000. OBSERVATIONS OF THE POPULATION DYNAMICS OF APHIS SPIRAEPHAGA MŰLL. (HOMOPTERA, APHIDIDAE) ON THE SHRUBS OF SPIRAEA VANHOUTTEI ZABEL., S. ARGUTA ZABEL., AND S. SALICIFOLIA L., EJPAU 3(2), #03.
Available Online: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume3/issue2/horticulture/art-03.html

OBSERVATIONS OF THE POPULATION DYNAMICS OF APHIS SPIRAEPHAGA MŰLL. (HOMOPTERA, APHIDIDAE) ON THE SHRUBS OF SPIRAEA VANHOUTTEI ZABEL., S. ARGUTA ZABEL., AND S. SALICIFOLIA L.

Bożenna Ja¶kiewicz

 

ABSTRACT

The subject of studies conducted in the years 1994-1996 were observations on the occurrence of Aphis spiraephaga Müll. on three spirea species: Spiraea vanhouttei Zabel., S. arguta Zabel. and S. salicifolia L. Aphids were most numerous on the examined shrubs in 1995, while their lowest numbers were observed in 1994. It was also found out that these aphids colonised the shrubs of S. vanhouttei in the highest degree, being rare on S. salicifolia. The effect of weather (heat, drought, showers of rain) on the number and dynamics of the aphid population concerning the place and period of feeding was greater on S. vanhouttei and S. arguta as compared with S. salicifolia. The damage caused by the feeding of that aphid was often reduced by the plant itself, because those shrubs grew intensively, after the aphids flew away. Newly appearing leaves were not deformed. Another factor which significantly lowered the ornamental value of the sh

Key words: Aphis spiraephaga, spireas: Spiraea vanhouttei Zabel., S. arguta Zabel. and S. salicifolia L..

INTRODUCTION

Spireas as a valued element of green areas are highly ornamental shrubs, which have very small requirements concerning the soil and which are characterised by high resistance to urban and industrial pollution and dry periods. A big role in the functioning of green areas in cities is played by herbivorous insects, for example aphids, which are dangerous pests lowering the ornamental value of these shrubs.

Aphis spiraephaga Müll. is a foreign species colonising the plants of Spiraea genus in parks, housing estates and squares. This aphid came to Poland by way of expansive migration from central Asia. Achremowicz [1], Barczak [2], Starý [13], Szelęgiewicz [14], Vereshchagin, Vereshchagin [16] remark on its presence in most European countries, while Halbert, Voegtlin [3] in Canada and North America. In Poland it is found in few regions [14], and since 1973 it has also been observed in Lublin [1, 4].

The purpose of the present studies was to establish the dynamics of the number of A. spiraephaga Műll. on three species of shrubs from the genus of Spiraea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Observations were carried out in the years 1994-1996 in Lublin in the area of a housing estate called "Czechów". The following shrub species were included in the observations: Spiraea vanhouttei Zabel., Spiraea arguta Zabel. and Spiraea salicifolia L.

Five shrubs from each examined species growing near each other were chosen for analysis. Monitoring was performed from early spring to late autumn with 10-days’ intervals. When the weather conditions were unfavourable the observations were postponed onto the following days. Attention was paid to different injuries on the examined shrubs.

The keys of Műller [10], Šapošnikov [12] and Rupajs [11] were used while marking the aphids. Meteorological data were obtained from the Institute of Agrometeorology of the University of Agriculture in Lublin.

Fot. 1. Aphis spireaphaga Müll. on Spiraea vanhouttei Zabel.

Fot. 2. Aphis spireaphaga Müll. on Spiraea salicifolia L.

RESULTS

The observations found out that the aphid Aphis spiraephaga Müll. was most numerous on the shrubs of Spiraea vanhouttei Zabel., while its lowest numbers were noticed on the shrubs of Spiraea salicifolia L. The weather course in the studied years is presented in figures 1, 2, 3, and the dynamics of the aphid population is shown in figures 4, 5, 6. Table 1 presents information on the numbers of aphids on the examined shrub species.

Fig. 1. General information about the weather in 1994

Fig. 2. General information about the weather in 1995

Fig. 3. General information about the weather in 1996

Fig. 4. Dynamics of the population of A. spiraephaga on S. vanhouttei, S. arguta and S. salicifolia in 1994

Fig. 5. Dynamics of the population of A. spiraephaga on S. vanhouttei, S. arguta and S. salicifolia in 1995

Fig. 6. Dynamics of the population of A. spiraephaga on S. vanhouttei, S. arguta and S. salicifolia in 1996

Table 1. Number of Aphis spiraephaga Müll. on spirea shrubs in the years 1994-1996

Year

Aphids morphs

Shrub species

Totally

Spiraea
vanhouttei

Spiraea arguta

Spiraea salicifolia

1994

Wingless

1370.2

618.8

120.8

2109.8

Winged

22.4

24.4

18.2

65.0

Totally

1392.6

643.2

139.0

2174.8

1995

Wingless

2049.4

908.2

144.4

3102.0

Winged

42.8

29.8

14.0

86.6

Totally

2092.2

938.0

158.4

3188.6

1996

Wingless

2421.4

418.2

88.2

2927.8

Winged

37.8

15.4

9.2

62.4

Totally

2459.2

433.6

97.4

2990.2

Totally

Wingless

5841.0

1945.2

353.4

8139.6

Winged

103.0

69.6

41.4

214.0

Totally

5944.0

2014.8

394.8

8353.6

After a mild winter of 1994 (fig.4) the beginning of the vegetative period began on the first days of April. The first larvae of mothers on S. vanhouttei and S. arguta appeared in the third 10-days’ period of April. Their small colonies on S. arguta were observed on the first 10 days of May, and a week later they appeared on S. vanhouttei. Subsequent observations found a more than double increase of the number of aphids on both shrub species. May showers (May 25 and 26) caused a short-lasting inhibition of the dynamic development of aphids, a part of which were washed away from the young shoots on which they were feeding. Beginning with June another increase of the numbers took place, and the maximum was found out in the second 10-days’ period. There were 343.2 aphids/shrub on S. vanhouttei, and 103.2 aphids/shrub on S. arguta. At the same time rare specimens of aphids were observed on S. salicifolia, and their number grew , reaching the maximum in the second 10-days’ period of July; it was 29.8 aphids/shrub. The heat waves in July had a smaller influence on the reduction of the aphid population on S. salicifolia, since they most frequently stayed on the bottom part of the leaves, while on the two other species of spirea the number of aphids clearly decreased, and the winged females leaving the shrubs appeared more often.

After the showers of rain in August there was a rapid decrease of the aphid population, and on S. salicifolia the aphid colonies disappeared. Only singular individuals were observed till the end of August. Beginning with September, the studies found out an increase of the number of aphids in colonies on all the shrub species, especially in the second 10-days’ period of the month. Ground frosts, which occurred on October 19 probably, caused a complete disappearance of aphids.

After an average winter of 1995 (fig. 5), the vegetative season began about April 10. The first scarce colonies on S. arguta appeared in the first 10-days’ period, and on S. vanhouttei in the second 10-days’ period of May. In subsequent observations, when the weather conditions were favourable, the number of aphids grew. A month after aphids appeared on the shrubs of S. arguta the maximum was observed, which was 141.2 aphids/shrub, and on S. vanhouttei the maximum, which was 421.8 aphids/shrub was established in the third 10-days’period of June. On four shrubs of S. salicifolia the aphids of A. spiraephaga appeared in very small numbers in the first 10-days’ period of June, and their maximum, 40.2 aphids/shrub, was noted on the first 10 days of July. In July and August the number of aphids on all shrubs was low, and winged individuals were observed more often. They flew away to other shaded spireas, which was probably due to the dry period. Disappearance of aphids on S. salicifolia took place on the first 10 days of August. After a storm (August 21) S. arguta shrubs were also free from aphids. Their small colonies occurred on three shrubs again between the second and third 10-days’ periods of September. With varying intensities, aphids stayed on S. vanhouttei from the second to the third 10-days’ periods of September.

After a long and frosty winter of 1996 (fig. 6) the beginning of the vegetative period was delayed by about four weeks. Singular specimens were observed on the bottom part of the leaves beginning with the first 10-days’ period of May, and first scarce colonies on S. vanhouttei and S. arguta were found in the third 10-days’ period of May. Warm May and June favoured a dynamic growth of aphids, especially on the shrubs of S. vanhouttei. It was also found out that aphids moved to the top parts of the shoots. The maximum was achieved on both shrub species in the third 10-days’ period of June; on S. vanhouttei it was 505.2 aphids/shrub, and on S. arguta 79.4 aphids/shrub. Beginning with July the number of aphids gradually decreased, which could have been caused by frequent showers of rain washing away the insects from plants. Additionally, the situation was made even worse by the heat waves on the first ten days of August. Between the first t en days of August and the middle of the first 10-days’ period of September only singular specimens were observed. Aphid colonies were observed again in September, and they stayed till the third 10-days’ period on S. arguta, and till the third
10-days’ period of October on S. vanhouttei. The aphids of A. spiraephaga on S. salicifolia were very rare in that season, and they fed for a very short time. They appeared in the second 10-days’ period of June and reached the maximum, 35.8 aphids/shrub, after three weeks. The first winged individuals appeared very soon, and they left the shrubs much earlier than in previous years, in the third 10-days’ periods of July.

DISCUSSION

It was found out on the basis of observations that in the years 1994-1996 A. spiraephaga aphids were most numerous on S. vanhouttei, their numbers were almost three times lower on S. arguta, and the lowest on S. salicifolia. The presence of A. spiraephaga on plants belonging to the genus of Spiraea is confirmed by other authors [1, 2, 3, 9, 14]. Lampel [9] also mentions them on Capsella bursapastoris, while Vereshchagin, Vereshchagin [16] remarks on their appearance on Valeriana officinalis. Every year these aphids formed colonies made up of numerous individuals on the shoots, leaves and inflorescences. Those observations confirmed the data provided by other authors according to which this species often stays on spirea throughout the vegetative period [3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 16]. Especially numerous colonies consisting of many individuals occurred on S. vanhouttei between June 15 and July 15. The maximum numbers, but smaller colonies, were found in June. On S. salicifolia this aphid appeared much later, and a slight maximum of the population was observed in the first and second 10-days’ period of July.

As follows from the numbers of the discussed aphid species, spirea shrubs of foreign origin (S. vanhouttei and S. arguta) are more popular, which is confirmed by the foreign origin of that aphid [1, 2, 13]. The numbers of A. spiraephaga were higher when the temperatures and rainfalls were within the norm. On the other hand, lower numbers were influenced by dry periods and high temperatures (over 30oC), which caused a decrease of the plants’ turgor. Then, winged females appeared more often in colonies. They left the shrubs, and probably colonised other spireas where the feeding conditions were better. Because these aphids usually feed on top shoots, heavy rainfalls caused that a considerable part of them were washed away and they died, which also negatively affected their numbers. It was observed [6, 7] that the numbers of those aphids have been lower in recent years; this especially concerns their appearance on S. vanhouttei. In summer months the shrub s were free from aphids more often and for longer periods of time, which might have been caused by the changing weather, especially by hot summers [15].

A. spiraephaga aphids on S. vanhouttei and S. arguta colonised the leaves on the top parts of young increments , but also the shoots themselves. Their feeding caused inhibition of the growth and a partial deformation of the shoots, as well as smaller leaves. However, because the shrubs grow intensively they did away with the results of injuries, and after the aphids flew away it was observed that the shoots continued to grow and the new leaves were not deformed any more. It was only big amounts of honey-dew that lowered the ornamental valour of shrubs. A short period of stay and relatively small numbers of the aphids on S. salicifolia resulted in slight injuries (twisting of the leaves), which did not affect the aesthetic appearance.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. A significant influence on the dynamics of A. spiraephaga population was exerted by weather conditions. In 1995, after a mild winter and cool spring with the rainfalls within the norm, aphids were most numerous, while in 1994 their numbers were the lowest probably due to frequent stormy rainfalls and earlier ground frosts.

  2. Aphids were most numerous on the shrubs of S. vanhouttei, and least numerous on the shrubs of S. salicifolia.

  3. Honey-dew, on which dark saprophytic fungi developed and marred the plants, was a factor considerably reducing the ornamental value of the shrubs.

REFERENCES

  1. Achremowicz J.: Materials for the aphid fauna (Homoptera, Aphidoidea) of the Lublin area. (In Polish). Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 329, 69-91, 1986.

  2. Barczak T.: A community of parasitoides (Hymenoptera, Parasitica) of Aphis spiraephaga Müll. (Homoptera, Aphididae) on spirea in Bydgoszcz. (In Polish). Urban Fauna. Published by ART Bydgoszcz, 117-122, 1998.

  3. Halbert S., Voegtlin D.: Morphological differential Aphis spiraecola and Aphis pomi (Homoptera, Aphididae). Great Lakes Entomologist, 25, 1, 1-8, 1992.

  4. Ja¶kiewicz B.: Studies on species composition of aphids occurring on selected species of ornamental shrubs in the University Park in Lublin. (In Polish). Fol. Soc. Lub. 28, Biol. 2, 1986.

  5. Ja¶kiewicz B.: Numbers and species composition of aphids on the shrubs of Spiraea salicifolia L. in the University Park in Lublin. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, EEE, III, 21, 191-204, 1995.

  6. Ja¶kiewicz B.: 1996. Quantity of aphids on shrubs of Spiraea arguta Zabel. in Lublin. Aphids and Other Homopterous Insects. 5. PAS, Skierniewice, 75-82.

  7. Ja¶kiewicz B.: 1997. Species composition and dynamics of occurrence of aphids on selected ornamental shrubs in the years 1973-1993. (In Polish). Published by AR Lublin, Ser. Rozpr. Nauk. 183.

  8. Ja¶kiewicz B.: 2000. Aphids colonising the bushes of Spiraea vanhouttei Zabel. in Lublin. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, EEE, VIII, 143-154.

  9. Lampel G.: 1968. Die Biologie des Blattlaus – Generationswechsels. Jena, 264 pp.

  10. Müller F. P.: 1976. Aphids – pests of plants. (In Polish). PAN, Ins. Zool., 118 pp.

  11. Rupajs A. A.: 1969. Atlas dendrofilnych tlej pribałtiki – Tli listievnych dierevev i kustarnikov. Izd. Zinatnie, Riga, 362 pp.

  12. Šapošnikow G. Ch.: 1964. Opriedielitiel nasiekomych jevropejskoj casti SSSR (red. Biej-Bijenko G. J.) (In SSSR). Izd. Nauka Moskwa–Leningrad, 489-619.

  13. Starý P.: 1995. Natural enemy spectrum of Aphis spiraephaga (Hom. Aphididae), an exotic immigrant aphid in central Europe. Entomophaga, 41, 1, 29-34.

  14. Szelęgiewicz H.: Aphids – Aphidoidea. (In Polish). A catalogue of the Polish fauna. PWN. Warsaw, 21, 4, 316 pp., 1968.

  15. Szelęgiewicz H.: Changes in the aphid fauna of Poland in the years 1956-1976. (In Polish). Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln., 208, 113-125, 1978.

  16. Vereshchagin B. V., Vereshchagin V. Ya.: 1990. The aphids Aphis spiraephaga Müll. in the European part of the USSR. Izvest. Akad. Nauk Moldavskoj SSR, 3, 73-74.


Submited:
Bożenna Ja¶kiewicz
Department of Entomology
University of Agriculture in Lublin
7 Leszczyńskiego, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
tel. (+48 81) 5323047
e-mail: bozenna@consus.ar.lublin.pl

Responses to this article, comments are invited and should be submitted within three months of the publication of the article. If accepted for publication, they will be published in the chapter headed ‘Discussions’ in each series and hyperlinked to the article.


[BACK] [MAIN] [HOW TO SUBMIT] [SUBSCRIPTION] [ISSUES] [SEARCH]